Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Just a quickie, does time matter?


pacman69
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6295 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Been a long time since I visited this site, had a lot to do lately and sort of forgot / put off about my claim against Lloyds TSB.

 

The basics,

 

I got up too and sent the LBA letter and got a response saying thank you blah blah blah and we can't do a thing. However the letter stated that if nothing else was received within 6 months Lloyds would consider the matter closed.

 

It has been over 6 months now, is this statement by Lloyds valid ???????

 

Can I go straight to court application or do I need to do everything again???

 

Thanks in advance

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be a good idea to start again - it's only an extra 28 days in total.

 

Good luck. Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would only do the LBA again and refer back to your and their previous letters, if you do not want to wait a month. Add in all your latest charges to your schedule, if appropriate.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have to be seen to be reasonable, id start again

 

JMHO

 

GLenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was a creditor collecting from you such as council tax then I don't think they would resend another LBA as it only states you will proceed unless they settle your claim in two weeks without limiting your actions beyond that date.

 

However it might be a good idea to restart again although that in itself may suggest to the people at the other end that they can put you of by delaying you since you have previously made these claims.

 

Maybe another more legally expert beagle could chime in but for myself unless for procedural & legal reasons I would simply proceed on the basis they have already been provided with an LBA.

Alasdair

 

LloydsTSB - Settled unconditionally

 

 

If this site has helped you pleas donate so that it can keep helping people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pacman69,

 

Strictly speaking you would not have to send another LBA. However, why not go down the middle, send a fresh one as per Guido, but this time only allow 7 days. You could then use the 7 days to get your claim form in tip top condition. Time spent preparing is never wasted, but do move soon as Lloyds seem to be settling some claims around the AQ stage and you may benefit. One claim recently settled before the AQ stage.

 

Paula

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Something funny here, just tried to see if I had anymore charges since the LBA none, thank god but when I search back through Lloyds online banking all the charges on my statements have dissapeared :confused:

 

Got all my paper statements still so will double check but the speadsheet I made with dates of charges doesn't match according to the online stuff, no charge on any account since 2002, now I'm sure i'm claiming £1300 worth

 

Help:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

At least you've got all of the paper statements to check. ;) It'll be interesting to see what's going on though.

 

Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

By time you have worked out all the different permutations for starting again and we have finished debating the point, the 28 days will be up!

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think sending out letters six months before starting a claim in court is fine go ahead.

 

The argument about what a DCA (edit Even) may or may not do is irrelevant, it wont be them stood before the judge.

 

We should all remember that we are learning to play this game, the banks lawyers on the other hand have some experience.

 

They will exploit every possible angle to get your claim chucked out, for most of us, we haven't even begun to notice the angles.

 

28 days is a small price to pay for the comfort of knowing they can attack your claim on that basis.

 

Your choice.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to go back to request for repayment (2) then see, I take all your points about not giving them anymore ammo than neccesary :)

 

Going to give it another go from start

 

Also going to sart on Natwest in the morning :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, i am more or less in the same position as you, but am not sure what to do now. send a revised schedule or go straight for MCOL? Keep us posted how you get on. Good luck.

A&L MCOL Filed 10.09.06

A&L Settled in full 21.09.06 £1567.35

 

Lloyds Credit Card MCOL Filed 30.01.07

MCOL Issued 31.01.07

MCOL Judgement started 21.02.07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...