Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statutory Removal Fee


superstottie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5811 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

My Husband managed to spin our car on thurday making a complete mess of it and leaving it with a blown tyre so he was unable to move it. The police attended the scene as it was a busy main road and he was sideways accross it and got a recovery operator out to recover it. When we wnet to recover our car the next day they informed us that on top of the £105 statutory removal fee we would also have to pay £40 for the use of a winch! From my understanding thay shouldn't be able to do this! I have found this Frequently Asked Questions and from what I can tell they must release the car upon paymant of the £105 and that the insurance company may decided to pay more if they want to. Also in the letter we got from the garage it states "as an Appointed Recovery Operator we may have additional cost incurred in recovering your vehicle into a position where it could be removed." Which implies that they will charge more if it was say down an inbankment and they had to use a hi-ab etc to drag it out but our car was at the side of the road and simply needed put on the back of the wagon!

 

They were also trying to charge me a storage charge as it had been there overnight but from what i can tell it doesn't come into effect till noon the day after it was recovered ie Friday.

 

Any help would be greatfully accepted as this whole matter is costing me enough money without garages trying to rip us off!:evil:

 

Bex

 

P.S. Its also quite funny how they could deliver it to our home address for £30 using the winch when it costs £40 for use of the winch????

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand the statutory fee is £105 plus storage charges of £12 per day after the first 24 hours. But according to this site:-

 

Avon and Somerset Constabulary - Vehicle removal

 

they can charge for additional equipment needed in the removal of the vehicle.

 

However, this site:-

 

Stolen Vehicles

 

reads a bit differently.

 

"However, if the recovery of the vehicle was particularly difficult or involved specialist equipment) e.g. burnt out vehicle/overturned vehicle, the recovery operator may charge additional justifiable costs."

 

It might be worthwhile asking them to justify their charges and the use of the winch. It might also be worth asking them if all their recovery trucks are fitted with a winch. If they are, then I would see it it as difficult for them to justify having to obtain specialist equipment if all their vehicles are fitted with a winch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my husband is a police recovery contractor. If theres anything he can help with just ask.

 

Winching is part of the recovery, if it didnt require winching you wouldn't required recovery. Which means it was not drivable. If the car was down an embankmeny say and required 2 men to do it safely you can justify a labour charge. Can you be more detailed about the accident and where and if who recovered it (pm me of course with this) and i will try and help you out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi The Law is quite clear here, the statutory removal fee at present is £105 there are no extras chargable to the public! and in fact to go to the true point of Law you should pay your 105 to the Police that is why it is exempt of VAT. type in Judge Bevington or the Mansfield case into Google and all will be revealled. Police Recoveries have been a Licence to print money for many for years until a Company was formed by 23 hard done by Recovery operators called Auto Rescue Logistics, they in turn formed ARL who now work for many Major Insurance Companies, who were sick and tired of gross overcharging backed up by the Police,whilst they took Mansfields to Court this was a test case! clearly the job was worth more than £105 but they refused to negotiate! They refused to negioate and this huge overturned Artic Truck was removed from Mansfields yard for £105. Also did you know that Unless the accident vehicle is involved in Crime or injury has occured then Motorists Requests must be observed at all times! this was said by Earl Atlee in the House of Lords.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...