Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would guess so dx which is why I've asked the OP to upload the original invoice.
    • ps i doubt the PCN says macdonalds?? MET dont operate a reverse trespass car park for mc'd's parkers going to starbucks...(occupants left vehicle claim) they only do that for the starbucks part  i bet you parked in the starbuck side and walked to MCd's? dx    
    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fox Mulder vs First Direct *** WON! ***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5865 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

I sent my initial letter from the template to First Direct in November along with my £10 fee. I got a reply within a week promising all statements would be sent by signed-for delivery and enclosing the £10 postal order I had sent to them, with explanation that they don't charge for providing the information.

 

However, it was several weeks before the statements arrived--just as I was on the verge of chasing them up.

 

With Christmas I wasn't able to devote sufficient time to beginning my claim proper but have now begun, today, with the preliminary letter drafted from the provided (and fantastic) templates. I removed the stuff relevant to default notices as I've never had any from First Direct--it's all bounced debits, overdraft fees.

 

I am going through my statements marking off any charges FD has made, and also making sure I deduct from the tally those charges that have been intermittently repaid in part (when this has happened, I have, for example, been given £30 back when complaining about £150 charges!). At no stage did I ever accept any partial repayments as anything approaching final settlement, nor did I make any promises not to pursue the remaining amounts. So I think I am okay there.

 

At the end of these calculations, I am sure I am going to have one heck of a shock both positive and negative. Negative, in that it's going to be a lot of money over the past three years I've had taken from the account; positive, in that I am now going to claim it all back.

 

I will keep this thread I have started updated so that I may be able to give others a sense of the timeline and any obstacles and encouragements I come across.

 

I would appreciate any and all helpful input, and want to thank everyone who contributes to and maintains this site.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Okay, I've done my calculations. It worked out just under £2,900 including interest to date. I won't use precise figures in case of banks monitoring.

 

I used the Standard Overdraft Rate for Cheque Accounts, which is 18.37 per cent, to calculate interest. In my spreadsheet, I've got columns for the items, the charges per item, the interest, the charge plus interest, and a cumulative column. This means if they make any part-payments in an attempt to dissuade going for the full amount, I can easily total up from the earliest charges how many to remove as I go on to claim the rest outstanding.

 

I know to make it clear any part-payments will not be accepted as final settlement, and that only the item, charge per item, and interest column need go to the bank attached to the letter.

 

Now the letter has to go off tomorrow, signed-for delivery. And then it's wait and see. I will report back here as and when I have more news... x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much! I got a standard form letter, I think, back today. It was from a 'Maureen Watson' in 'Credit Services Customer Relations'. It said:

 

***********************

 

Thank you for your recent letter.

 

I am sorry to learn of your concerns and I will ensure that a full investigation takes place. Please be assured that you will receive a response shortly, certainly within the next ten working days.

 

For your information, I have enclosed a copy of our leaflet 'listening to your comments', which provides further details about the bank's complaints procedure.

 

***********************

 

Now, they seem confused. I'm not making a complaint. I am neither assured nor do I care that she is sorry. And I am not interested in an investigation, that's for them if they want to do one. Put simply, I've made the demand for payment, in accordance with all the advice from this site, with the interest calculated correctly, with a clear 14 day deadline for the bank to respond to that letter properly and with a settlement offer.

 

They either do or they don't, in which case the next letter goes out giving them one more 14 day period.

 

No ifs, no buts, no B*S. Am I too harsh here? Am I missing anything?

 

The leaflet is a limp joke.

 

I take it I ignore this letter and keep the clock ticking down?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Claire. The goodwill on this site is amazing. I only hope I can be of such help to others over time.

 

I am posting the following link, to another section of the forum where I have been posting in relation to disability benefits being taken by the bank in respect of charges, leaving me with nothing to live on.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/36790-bank-taking-your-benefits-5.html#post550586

 

As it's a sideline from my primary action against FD, I thought it would be useful to cross-reference. My (currently) two posts on the benefit situation are (at time of writing) at the very end of that forum section, as there are lots of contributions thereon. x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was forced into a corner by Nat west and they let me with no money to live on. These 'suits' dont live in the real world and seem completely devoid of all reality.

If you havent any alternative may I suggest you do as I did and open a Post Office Card account,get your money paid in there, this way you can be certain that you will recieve all your money. Phone the relevent DSS officies and until the post office ac is open they will pay by Giro This will give you some breathing space and if there are any payments imminent ask the DSS to recall them and tell them why you need to be paid by giro

I know that you have posted relevent info on other threads,the moderators can only help you properly if you keep all the posts to one thread. I hope I am of help to you

  • Haha 1

If You are on benefits you must read this

 

Social Security Administration Act 1992

Miscellaneous

Certain benefit to be inalienable **

 

187- Subject to the provisions of this Act, every assignment of, or charge on-

(a)benefit as defined in section 122 of the Contributions and Benefits Act;

(b)any income-related benefit; or

©child benefit,

and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void; and, on the bankruptcy of the beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Smile account (Co-Op) which I could switch to having my benefits paid into, though I am quite prepared to send out fortnightly letters of appropriation to them to ensure (a) they don't keep doing this anymore and (b) are in clear line of fire for any action taken against them, if they choose to defy those letters. A part of me thinks, this will hopefully make them less inclined to abuse those on benefits in the future besides myself.

 

You are indeed of great help, and I am very grateful for your input, and everyone's. Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that you have posted relevent info on other threads,the moderators can only help you properly if you keep all the posts to one thread. I hope I am of help to you

 

The reason I cross-reference is because this is primarily the thread I created to deal specifically with my claim for all charges against FD - the other forum I am contributing to specifically because it's all about claiming back benefit payments wrongly taken, and that aspect of things is in many ways a separate issue. Benefits as such certainly don't come up in my preliminary approach letter, but rather charges overall.

 

So, FD charges claim in the FD section but benefits taken by FD in the benefits taken section, as it might help (and I might be helped by) others thereon with regard to that stuff. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I got a response with an offer of final settlement yesterday from First Direct - they sent it on the very last day of the 14 day period following the first demand for payment sent to them.

 

They have offered me just over £1,600 but for that, I have to sign away my right to make further claim and accept it as final settlement. They enclosed a form for me to sign.

 

No way. My claim is for just over £3,000. So my question is, how do I respond to this offer? I know I don't sign, but how do I approach it? They make no reference to how the monies would be paid, or when.

 

Do I just ignore the letter and write the second? Or do I state that amount would be accepted as a partial contribution to the final settlement, and if the money is paid to me, I would deduct it from the balance claimed?

 

Any help would be appreciated as always! They certainly play sly but I'm surprised they've responded, to be honest, with an immediate offer albeit a derisory one. While admitting no liability, of course. What, they think I'm going to think I'm in the wrong and they're just going to give me money for writing to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fox - they did exactly the same to me. I'm after the same amount. Received a offer for £1600 after two weeks which I rejected and another offer for £1900 which again I rejected.

Go to this link it has the letter template you need and I used (twice!).

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html

 

It's scary turning down money isn't it, but might as well get all your money back.

 

Dubliner

 

PS If this has been useful click the scales of justice below my name on the left

  • Haha 2

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

First Direct - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 29/12/06

Statements recieved 15/1/07 - >£3000 owed

Prelim sent 16.01.07

Partial offer received 01.02.2007

LBA and letter rejecting paltry offer sent 02.02.2007

MCOL filed mid Feb 07

AQ 26th March

 

 

BoS - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 29/12/06

Statements received 1.02.2007 - Prelim sent 02.02.2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happened to me too. I wrote back accepting as part payment and that I wanted the rest. I then sent my LBA and they sent another letter offering me the full amount (just under £3000). All in all it took 5 weeks.

 

Hang on in there - you WILL get it all!

 

BM

 

PS If this has been useful click the scales of justice below my name on the left

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happened to me too. I wrote back accepting as part payment and that I wanted the rest. I then sent my LBA and they sent another letter offering me the full amount (just under £3000). All in all it took 5 weeks.

 

Hang on in there - you WILL get it all!

 

BM

 

PS If this has been useful click the scales of justice below my name on the left

Bookmark, did your claim include interest ?

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my claim includes interest and they are saying that they dont pay interest refunds, they are currently offering about 90% of the value of the charges.

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone! First, let me start by saying thank you so much for your input, it's hugely appreciated.

 

It's good to know this £1,600 offer is pretty formula - I was worried after reading they usually offer 80 per cent, and their offer to me to date is less than that.

 

My letter before action is ready, as is my upwardly-revised statement (as other charges have gone on since the first one). I'm posting it Monday - only because the bank took all my disability benefits, aagh, and I don't have cash to send out a signed-for letter until then. Still, a few days won't be too long to wait...

 

dubliner10: Scary? Absolutely! It's very weird saying no to that kind of cash... And ta for the link! :-)

 

Stornoway: My claim includes interest too, charged at their advertised authorised overdraft rate of 18.37 per cent. I think what they are saying to you is, um, BS basically. I read elsewhere on the site it is entirely legitimate in the eyes of the court to claim interest, and doing so on the authorised overdraft rate is considered reasonable - claiming the higher unauthorised rate would be seen as greedy and work against a claimaint.

 

The reason it's valid to claim interest is because of whenever they took the money. My claim spreadsheet calculates interest per item on that rate I quote about - for example, a £30 charge incurred three years ago would be a lot more in real terms today because of the interest you could have accrued on it were it not taken from you, than a £30 charge taken yesterday.

 

What stage are you at? I'd issue the claim. The only bit that confuses me on that stage - not having got there yet - is how we switch to 8 per cent, and why? As in, do we reach a point at which we stop calculating using the unauthorised overdraft rate, take that 'final' figure and then from that calculate 8 per cent of the total amount, including the interest we're claiming?

 

Sheesh. It's as confusing to write about as it is to understand! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the click hope I have helped

John

If You are on benefits you must read this

 

Social Security Administration Act 1992

Miscellaneous

Certain benefit to be inalienable **

 

187- Subject to the provisions of this Act, every assignment of, or charge on-

(a)benefit as defined in section 122 of the Contributions and Benefits Act;

(b)any income-related benefit; or

©child benefit,

and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void; and, on the bankruptcy of the beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup Fox, thanks for the click, and good luck. I filed my MCoL today, time to sit back and wait now.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

First Direct - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 29/12/06

Statements recieved 15/1/07 - >£3000 owed

Prelim sent 16.01.07

Partial offer received 01.02.2007

LBA and letter rejecting paltry offer sent 02.02.2007

MCOL filed mid Feb 07

AQ 26th March

 

 

BoS - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 29/12/06

Statements received 1.02.2007 - Prelim sent 02.02.2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you dont mind me commenting but you have in past postings you have implied that you are on benefits.

If I am correct in my assumption then you may not have to pay for your court action, but this can only be done at your local Court not on line.

You will need a letter from the benefit people dated within the last 28 days showing what benefits you recieve and you will need a form N1, which can be downloaded from this site (dont forget both sides).

Then later on if you get to the AQ stage this form cost normally £100 to submit, dont assume that you are covered by the letter you took in originally. You again have to prove that you are on benefits with a letter again dated within 28 days of your submission of documents.

It seems a bit more complicated than on line but it does give you much more room for your POC.

If You are on benefits you must read this

 

Social Security Administration Act 1992

Miscellaneous

Certain benefit to be inalienable **

 

187- Subject to the provisions of this Act, every assignment of, or charge on-

(a)benefit as defined in section 122 of the Contributions and Benefits Act;

(b)any income-related benefit; or

©child benefit,

and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void; and, on the bankruptcy of the beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi johnwilsonstorey

 

Yes, I am on benefits but I took a look and because my disability is a cognitive not physical one, I get incapacity not disability, and incapacity benefit claimants are liable to pay. Thank you for taking the trouble to highlight that, though. It is appreciated.

 

I needed to update my claim details here. I gave FD one final chance to settle at £3k, told them not to bother offering anything less as it would be considered frivolous given the sum claimed - the last offer was for a tiny amount over 2k. My offer was ignored - no response at all. Well, I did get a response - a letter telling me I was over my overdraft limit with a warning, this time, to basically watch it. Never had one of those before, not a warning. Notice, yes, warning, no.

 

I took this as quite insulting, to be honest.

 

I filed my court claim this week, having given the bank a fairly long time to communicate and act reasonably. As soon as I get my claim number I will update the relevant forum for the moderators' records.

 

I downloaded the N1 as it gave, as you say, much more room for what needed to be said. I was, however, as concise and to-the-point as possible. I had worked out two possibles, one being the claim with contractual interest and the other with 8 per cent interest. I gave the court the second as an alternative only, as per advice in these forums.

 

The particulars of claim were tough to work out and be confident I'd got them right, which I am. Getting the forms ready to send out took three hours. But it was time well spent. I'm now just waiting to hear back from the court, and who knows - maybe FD will finally see I am serious, and try to settle before court.

 

I can't help but wonder if FD didn't take me seriously because the bank knows I am on a low income, and perhaps thought I wouldn't fork out on court costs. I see some others had to go far less a distance to get what was theirs by right, and wonder why I am having to go as far as I am...

Link to post
Share on other sites

My claim was issued 24 April, court sent it first class 24 April, deemed to be served 26 April, FD has until 10 May to reply.

 

I've incurred charges since submitting my claim. Over £100. If the bank does attempt to settle before court, should I demand that all charges including those made since submission be paid? Or if a full offer of the claim is paid by them, including my court fees, simply accept that and then start the process all over again to reclaim the charges that weren't covered by my court application?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tip, I had a feeling that might be the case. If they do try to settle I will bring up the monies they are continuing to take after the claim went in - it's about £200 now - and if I have to start all over again after one successful claim, at least finding the court monies won't be the hardship they've been first time round.

 

Am now about to start reading through for prepping my court bundle....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, FD has notified the court it intends to file a defence and I've heard nothing directly from them. In the meantime, they've deducted nearly 200 in charges since the court papers went to them. I'm noting everything in a new spreadsheet.

 

Question: Can I start a new action against FD for the latest batch of penalty fees before the first court action has reached a conclusion? In other words, could I send them a prelim demand for payment letter today for the new amount?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...