Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There isn’t any discrepancy’s whatsoever this will be my final comment and then I will deal with this matter with the admin of this website and I will make sure justice is served.   Clearly you are not a police officer so you are not sure how this all works , however it does not need to be explained I have given my advice so that matters don’t blow out of proportion and people aren’t prosecuted legally, however if you are not interested in listening to what I have to say then by all means the law will deal with you.   I ask you to be prepared for a visit by West Midlands police I can assure you if you carry on posting pictures of a underaged child on the internet you will be arrested and prosecuted this isn’t blackmail it is against the law to post pictures of someone under the age of 18 online without there consent this is the LAW right now the LAW is being broken therefore there will be consequences I shall not be replying and will make sure matters are dealt with correctly.    Thanks.    
    • Just so I'm clear then, are you posting here in an official capacity on behalf of the West Midlands Police? There's no reason for you not to answer that.
    • The discrepancy in your comment is the fact you stated you worked for the west midlands police and you then later went on to say you would report this website to the police, please explain why you would report a forum website to the force you work for? Would you not investigate it yourself?  You have also failed to acknowledge the complaints of all the victims of this individual who you claim is a 17 year old child and could not have been capable of doing any of this, so what you’re saying is that none of these fraudulent and evasive crimes were committed and that we should remove all findings due to you individually going out of your way to go to the suspects family home and not getting in touch with any of the victims about your findings, instead you, an alleged member of the police force, has come onto this forum website to disclose information about your investigation? You, an alleged police officer, have also blackmailed the members of this forum to remove their findings or you will threaten to prosecute, is this how prosecution works? I look forward to hearing from you LouiseAnnMarie
    • Hi ,   I don’t need to correspond with everyone who messages I will only liaise with the admin of this website going forward, I have tried to be fair and help by asking to keep personal information pictures etc of a underage child of the internet as this is against the LAW and will create many more serious problems   However, answering your question   I deal with all aspects of cyber bullying / online crime. 
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Advice Needed since claim settled=more charges


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 5077 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hey T4FF

 

A forced closure of a bank account would not affect your credit rating, even if you had an overdraft. The relinquishment of an overdraft would not be deemed adverse, indeed it would show on your file that the OD no longer existed, but as there are so many reasons for relinquishment the data isn't concise enough to distinguish (eg there isn't a "withdrew at customer request" versus "withdrew at bank request" etc) so it wouldn't actually affect your credit rating at all.

 

Sadly was in a position to fully pay off the OD at the MCOL stage, but since then am not - but RBS are decent enough in that respect, and even if they losed the a/c they would offer a payment plan, indeed even if they decided to be spiteful I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

 

A lender isn't allowed to list a credit commitment as defaulted unless they are of the sound belief they have no other avenue to get the funds back - they would have to offer an affordable payment plan prior to default.

Telewest v RBS

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/royal-bank-scotland-bank/61214-telewest-rbs.html[/url]

Telewest v A&L

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester/61215-telwest-l.html[/url]

Telewest v Halifax

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank/63775-telewest-halifax.html[/url]

 

If I've helped - hit the scales and rate me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well.....I was always under the impression that it can affect your credit rating and I'm sure I read that here somewhere.

 

Opening up a parachute account is advised so that if your account is closed, you will already have a backup account open as it would otherwise be difficult to open one up.

 

If you are right, then I stand correct although this suggests that it may affect your credit rating?

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Your credit rating would only be affected if the overdraft facility was rescinded (when the a/c was forcefully closed) and the bank chose to abuse their access to the credit register by defaulting you if you were unable to repay it in full by 30 days *ahem A & L*

  • Haha 1

Telewest v RBS

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/royal-bank-scotland-bank/61214-telewest-rbs.html[/url]

Telewest v A&L

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester/61215-telwest-l.html[/url]

Telewest v Halifax

[url]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank/63775-telewest-halifax.html[/url]

 

If I've helped - hit the scales and rate me!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...