Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ignore stop panicking about a whole nothing burger. 100's of threads here. dx  
    • this is not America, don't keep believing what you see on TV or about the USA means that happens here, it DOES NOT. you won't and they can't use character assassination to try and discredit you nor can they access ANYTHING that is not already in the PUBLIC domain about you. none of which you are fretting about are PUBLIC RECORDS. as for 'being arrested = a criminal record' = untrue. where did you ever get that idea from?? it is not publicly available and is only held on police PNC. and no your details cannot be published in a news paper = same rules apply to you as the accused, in fact even more so. you really do appears to be reading some very weird websites..  
    • Thanks dx and jk.   I'll just ignore them. I did check the advice given in other threads but wanted to be sure that was still relevant to my situation.  Thanks again. Appreciate the support 
    • I've been on this site for eight years and I haven't seen one PPC case where a DCA turned up at the motorist's door. Even if they did they couldn't do anything, but in any case it's never happened. If you read this short thread you will see all the stages of the legal procedure all the way to winning in court, which is highly unlikely to be necessary in your case  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406892-highview-parking-anpr-pcn-claimform-urban-exchange-manchester-claim-dismissed/#comments
    • They upped the quote by £120 in the end, forcing me to go elsewhee
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

sam78 V's Abbey***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you very much!

 

I've sent another email to James at Abbey, I thought I'd attach it.

 

"

Further to my email of yesterdays date, I wish to update you.

 

I have today received my Allocation Questionnaire to be completed and returned to the courts by 26th March. Unless I receive an offer for the full amount requested, £xxx plus daily interest at xxx, then I shall file the Allocation Questionnaire, at a further cost of £100, whch I will be claiming as court costs.

 

I will allow you until 10am on Wednesday 14th March to settle this claim, failing which I shall personally hand in the questionnaire at my local court.

 

I look forward to hearing from you."

 

Purejayne - I'll keep updating until I win. I will also keep an eye on any threads you have too and see if I can be of any use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 170
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

James Arrandale is the 'legal representative' dealing with my case at abbey. His email address is irrelevant to you at the moment until, and if, you reach the court case stage. He may be the person dealing wth your claim hen it comes to it, thoug it may be someone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either him or Inga Kirkman (I believe).

 

I have just received a letter from James settling my claim.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sam

 

We settled on £700 (around £35 short, but saves agro of bundles etc).

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can someone check that I have this right.

 

I have written in the following in section G of my AQ:

 

The Claimant proposes the attached draft order for directions, for the courts due consideration. If ordered, the Claimant believes these directions will allow the overriding objectives to be furthered in that they will fully identify the most fundamental issues in dispute (as detailed below), and allow them to be assessed so that this claim may proceed justly and expeditiously.

 

- The crux upon which this claim rests is the true cost incurred by the Defendant as a result of the contractual breach from which its charges arise. If the Defendant cannot substantiate the cost of each charge as proportionate to its loss incurred, it has charged contractual penalties contrary to the UTCCR 1999 and common law principles established since the early 1900's.

 

- In the event that the Defendant's charges were accepted as being a fee for a service (which is denied), examination of its true costs is required to determine whether the price is reasonable as required by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

 

As the law relating to contractual penalties is long established, the Claimant believes the outstanding issues to be of fact. Accordingly, the Claimant respectfully requests that the claim be allocated to the small claims track, and estimates that the hearing of the claim should last no longer than one hour.

 

 

Do I then attach these draft directions?

 

"Draft Order for Directions

The Claimant shall within 14 days of service of this order send to the Defendant and to the Court:

  • a) A schedule setting out each charge repayment of which is sought, showing the date, amount, and reason given (if any) for that charge being made;

  • b) Copies of any statement or other document relied upon as showing that each and every charge has been made;

  • c) A statement of evidence of all matters relied upon as tending to show that the charges are irrecoverable as penalties or otherwise;

  • d) Copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon.

If the Claimant fails to comply with this order, the claim will be struck out without further order.

 

 

 

2. The Defendant shall within 14 days thereafter file and serve a response to the Claimant's schedule, stating in respect of each item claimed;

  • a) Pursuant to what contractual provision such charge was made, producing a copy of the contractual document relied upon;

  • b) Whether such charge is accepted to be a penalty, and if not why not;

  • c) If such charge is alleged to be a pre-estimate of the Defendant's loss incurred by the Claimant's actions (whether or not such action is treated as a breach of contract between the parties), all facts and matters intended to be relied upon as showing that such was a proper estimate of such loss, and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to what the true cost of dealing with the matter was;

  • d) If such charge is not alleged to be a pre-estimate of the Defendant's loss incurred by the Claimant's actions then facts and matters intended to be relied upon showing the basis upon which the charge was calculated and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to show that the charge was fair and reasonable.

  • e) Any witness statements.

  • f) Copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon.

If the Defendant fails to comply with this order, the Defence will be struck out without further order."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much. I hope they cough up soon too, am moving house next week! The deadline I set for James ends tomorrow at 10am, but unbeknown to him I won't be filing the AQ until Thursday morning, but I'll be doing it first thing.

Fingers crossed we get this sorted quickly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

"Draft Order for Directions

 

 

The Claimant shall within 14 days of service of this order send to the Defendant and to the Court:

  • a) A schedule setting out each charge repayment of which is sought, showing the date, amount, and reason given (if any) for that charge being made;

  • b) Copies of any statement or other document relied upon as showing that each and every charge has been made;

  • c) A statement of evidence of all matters relied upon as tending to show that the charges are irrecoverable as penalties or otherwise;

  • d) Copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon.

If the Claimant fails to comply with this order, the claim will be struck out without further order.

 

 

 

2. The Defendant shall within 14 days thereafter file and serve a response to the Claimant's schedule, stating in respect of each item claimed;

  • a) Pursuant to what contractual provision such charge was made, producing a copy of the contractual document relied upon;

  • b) Whether such charge is accepted to be a penalty, and if not why not;

  • c) If such charge is alleged to be a pre-estimate of the Defendant's loss incurred by the Claimant's actions (whether or not such action is treated as a breach of contract between the parties), all facts and matters intended to be relied upon as showing that such was a proper estimate of such loss, and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to what the true cost of dealing with the matter was;

  • d) If such charge is not alleged to be a pre-estimate of the Defendant's loss incurred by the Claimant's actions then facts and matters intended to be relied upon showing the basis upon which the charge was calculated and all evidence to be adduced at trial as to show that the charge was fair and reasonable.

  • e) Any witness statements.

  • f) Copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon.

If the Defendant fails to comply with this order, the Defence will be struck out without further order."

 

Hi sorry I am a bit confused! I understand that I put the other bit in section G of the from but do I attach this as a seperate sheet? And the part about the claimant (ME) do i have to then send all this stuff again? or is that the court bundle which goes when i get a court date?

 

cheers

 

Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sam

I think that the draft order for directions is a seperate sheet attached to the AQ. Send that off and then when you get a date from the court you get all your papers together into your court bundle - well that's what i'm going to do anyway lol

Hope it's right but if it's not i'm sure someone will tell us!

Good luck

Money ;)

NatWest - £364.02 settled

Abbey - £1,686.86 settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Money - Yep you're right, the draft directions are a separate sheet attached to the AQ. The court bunde will be required by a given date once you have a hearing date.

 

marie - not a bean from mr arrandale - the AQ gets filed tomorrow morning. I'm just about to email him again - will post it on here once it's done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a copy of the email

 

"Dear James,

 

Further to my previous emails, I note that the deadline has now passed without any contact from yourself and without settlement. I have, therefore, filed the Allocation Questionnaire that was sent to me.

 

I will now be claiming further charges for court fees and interest at the daily rate of 56p.

 

The total being claimed now stands at £3653.47 and as previously stated, I shall also be requesting costs for the tme spent producing my court bundle - which is well underway.

 

I would also like to advise you that I have put forward a request for the draft directions below.

 

DRAFT DIRECTIONS AS PREVIOUS POST

 

Please submit your Allocation Questionnaire to the courts as soon as possbile so that a hearing date can be arranged.

Kind regards"

Don't think he'll respond to this either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that's my AQ filed. Apparently, my local court has to arrange a hearing within a timescale of 15 weeks, but hopefully I'll get this claim sorted before then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 weeks! Blimey that's a long time to wait for your money isn't it lol

Didn't realise you could carry on charging interest while all this is going on, have to have a look at that!

Anyway good luck Sam

Money

NatWest - £364.02 settled

Abbey - £1,686.86 settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes, when you file your claim it's at that point that you work out the daily interest rate and then just kep a track of the number of days until they settle.

 

15 weeks does seem a long time but that is the maximum wait so with a little bit of luck all this may be over long before then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, it's been a while since I updated but that's due to moving house. We're now settled in and I can continue where I left off.

I contacted the local court last week and they confirmed that the Abbey had returned their AQ - on the last day. I was told that the file had gone to the judge and that a hearing date should be allocated within 10 days. I'm going to give them a call tomorrow to se if they have an update.

No contact from James as yet!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Things are starting to move at pace now. I've called the courts this morning and a date has been set for 2nd May 2007 at 3pm!!! I have emailed the abbey to let them know. All paperwork should be with me soon regarding directions etc.

 

As the date is so near, would it appear to anyone other than me that the judge has proceeded with my draft directions request?

 

Bring it on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bugger! Have got home and the paperwork from the courts has arrived. I have been set a directions hearing which will last approx 10 minutes. Anyone else had this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...