Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

confused about reply to my CCA request, please help!***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5617 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

SA I am still following your thread.

 

Great letter Curlyben - I sent a similar one to DCA H Cohen & Co recently since THEY purport to be a legal firm as well but for some strange reason do not know their obligations under the CCA........!!:rolleyes:

 

Good luck SA !

 

Cyberhugs:)

Love Spiritgirl x

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Great letter, thanks CB, this will help a great deal. I will also add a bit to it, namely quoting Lowell from one of their last letters about them taking my phone number off their records...then list the log of calls I've had from them since!:rolleyes: that will go nicely with all the other guidelines they have broken:D

 

Thanks for the encouragement SG :) I was diagnosed with vertigo yesterday, so I have to limit my time on the pc and writing letters to the days when I am feeling 'normal'. Your support is welcomed very much. XX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another letter from Hamptons received today....

Legal proceedings may now be issued and served upon you without notice through the county court, which would incur you with payment of the following costs:

Court fee's £120

Sols costs £80

Interest £100+

It goes on to state the usual crap, you can phone us blah blah, and pay us blah blah. The letter I sent them must have either crossed in the post or they are ignoring it.

We shall wait and see........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya SA

 

The amount of times they say this kind of thing when they know they haven't got a leg to stand on if they went to court amazes me.

 

They really are plonkers all of them :mad:

 

The so called "legal firms" seem to be by far the worse. Do they honestly think that because they ARE a "legal firm" we will be so intimidated by this fact that we will not challenge them!!

 

I've got Sechiari Clark & Mitchell chasing me now regarding 2 alleged debts with Lloyds Bank. Their approach (with their first contact) was threatening and heavy handed. Naturally they have been CCA'd despite their threats of court action "within 7 days" BUT there are people out there who must be terrified out of their wits by such letters and who pay up without challenging them, like the elderly or more vulnerable, and this makes me so MAD :-x

 

Good luck SA

I'll keep watching

Love Spiritgirl x

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are not solicitors as there is no mentioned of a solicitor on their letter, if there were a solicitors they would obliged by the law services to have solicitor on their letter heading.

 

Also I note from Geoffrey Parker Bourne has only one solicitors name on his letter heading but to be in a practices you would need to have at least two people for any practice. :!:

 

Best of Luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks SpiritGirl, and good luck with your battle...I had dealings with SC&M when I did my LLoyds claim, they are a joke!! No doubt you won't let them intimidate you:)

 

Hi Allwood, I omitted the solicitors bit from CB's letter, felt very tempted to put in something else;) but thought better of it!

Thanks for the support guys n gals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another letter from Hamptons received today....

 

It goes on to state the usual crap, you can phone us blah blah, and pay us blah blah. The letter I sent them must have either crossed in the post or they are ignoring it.

We shall wait and see........

 

If that's the "3 days to respond" letter, you have reached the end of Lowells automated threatogram cycle. You may get another 'generous' discount offer, but that's pretty much it.

 

At this point, someone will have to look at the account and make a decision on what to do next, usually pass it back to OC, or perhaps check out the tracing. This is the point where you might get a little battle start up, so be prepared just in case......

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that info, Dannyboy, I've already been through Lowells cycle once, 2nd time lucky eh? I'm up for a fight if they are!:D

 

I think you're home and dry.

 

If they had a CCA and any intention of taking you to court, I'm pretty sure they would have done something by now.

 

Just bide your time, but I think that's probably it.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya S.A.

 

I'm with Danny Boy on this one - its probably Lowells final throw of their toys from the cot ...hang on in there mate!

 

I know how you feel - its the holding of your nerve at this point which is the hardest isn't it? I'm in the same position with SCM and their legal threats BUT as we both know these berks all need a properly executed agreement if they are going to pursue their threats to court which, if they DID have, they should have produced by now.

 

I'll keep watching and rooting for ya ;) (((Cyber hugs to you)))

 

Love Spiritgirl x

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya S.A.

 

I'm with Danny Boy on this one - its probably Lowells final throw of their toys from the cot ...hang on in there mate!

 

I know how you feel - its the holding of your nerve at this point which is the hardest isn't it? I'm in the same position with SCM and their legal threats BUT as we both know these berks all need a properly executed agreement if they are going to pursue their threats to court which, if they DID have, they should have produced by now.

 

I'll keep watching and rooting for ya ;) (((Cyber hugs to you)))

 

Love Spiritgirl x

Thanks SG, right back atcha!:D

 

I hope this will be the end of it, but I know from reading around Lowell don't give up easily. If I do get anymore correspondence I will post it up, and then probably complain to TS etc...I've not done that up to now as I got a bit discouraged with them the last time I used them, and also after reading the way they have reacted with some members here, regarding CCA's etc. But, I know that should be my next step, so I will follow it if I have to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am at the stage where i need to get TS involved too, so i will read this thread with interest, hope you dont mind me borrowing your ideas ! Thanks SA. Im new to this, isnt there a way of subscribing to the thread somehow, d'oh, could you pm me with instructions please. Ta.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys and gals...after a few days away I came home yesterday to find another letter from my great friends Lowell...it states at the top NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE A COUNTY COURT CLAIM.

Take notice that legal proceedings are currently being prepared to be sent to Court for sevice upon you. Should you want to avoid this happening you should contact us within the next 3 days to arrange settlement of your current debt.

 

I highlighted the 3 days as the letter is dated 20th Aug, but I know for a fact that it didn't arrive until yesterday, the 25th. I can't quite make out the date on the postmark:rolleyes: The underlined bit was clearly showing through the envelope window too! The return address is PO box 8743, Bellshill, ML4 3WU an address I've not come across before. They also want to add over £300 in costs and interest!!

 

Time to contact TS I think. I will spend some time over the next day or so, gathering everthing I need. Any comments and advice welcome:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something I've noticed is that the application forms/credit agreements that the idiots send to me are all copies of copies of copies.

 

I now tell them that I will pay if they allow me to view the original document at their or their clients offices closest to my home.

 

Providing that it is the actual signed document that they would need in a court case and I am satisfied that it complies with the CCA 1974.

 

I believe that this derails any court action as I am being reasonable and doing all I can to avoid the issue going to court.

 

So if they produce I will pay.

 

After that the letters they send are harassment and can be ignored until court papers are issued.

 

Any idea if this would work?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Something I've noticed is that the application forms/credit agreements that the idiots send to me are all copies of copies of copies.

 

I now tell them that I will pay if they allow me to view the original document at their or their clients offices closest to my home.

 

Providing that it is the actual signed document that they would need in a court case and I am satisfied that it complies with the CCA 1974.

 

I believe that this derails any court action as I am being reasonable and doing all I can to avoid the issue going to court.

 

So if they produce I will pay.

 

After that the letters they send are harassment and can be ignored until court papers are issued.

 

Any idea if this would work?

 

 

CAS what a brilliant idea! I must admit I would love to try this myself with some of my DCAs. As you have said you are being reasonable and doing all you can to avoid going to Court and wasting the Court's valuable time - this is all in your favour and I am sure a Court would look positively on this if the DCA were stupid enough to take you there.

 

S.A. yes I think TS is now a must for you.

 

As for Lowells, what "document" are they going to be relying on in Court if there is no CCA??? As Rory always says, and I've just been commenting on on another thread

...no CCA is a complete Defence..

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/108295-debt-sold-then-sold.html

 

 

 

Love Spiritgirl x

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys and gals...after a few days away I came home yesterday to find another letter from my great friends Lowell...it states at the top NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE A COUNTY COURT CLAIM.

Take notice that legal proceedings are currently being prepared to be sent to Court for sevice upon you.

 

Had a bit of route around!

 

tt8 gave me a fantastic letter which tied my special friends in knots, I must have lost the .rtf file when computer crashed so here's an OCR scan of my original letter.

 

Dear xxxx,

 

I acknowledge receipt of your notice of legal action sent by your company on 3rd July 2007 which was received on 6th July 2007.

Please be aware that any proceedings will be extremely vigorously defended and that a counterclaim will be made against Robinson, Way and Company Limited. I am unable to respond further at this time, since you have given me inadequate information to investigate the claim. Please note that under the Overriding Objectives, you have a duty to act reasonably at all times.

 

As you are aware, under the pre-action protocols of the Civil Procedure Rules, your letter before action should have included the following information:

4.3 The claimant's letter should —

(a) give sufficient concise details to enable the recipient to understand and investigate the claim without extensive further information;

(b) enclose copies of the essential documents which the claimant relies on;

© ask for a prompt acknowledgement of the letter, followed by a full written response within a reasonable stated period;

(For many claims, a normal reasonable period for a full response may be one month.)

(d) state whether court proceedings will be issued if the full response is not received within the stated period;

(e) identify and ask for copies of any essential documents, not in his possession, which the claimant wishes to see;

(f) state (if this is so) that the claimant wishes to enter into mediation or another alternative method of dispute resolution; and

(g) draw attention to the court's powers to impose sanctions for failure to comply with this practice direction and, if the recipient is likely to be unrepresented, enclose a copy of this practice direction.

I note that your letter failed to enclose copies of the essential documents upon which you will seek to rely, failed to ask for acknowledgement of the letter, failed to ask for a written response within a reasonable period of time, and did not draw attention to the courts powers

to force all parties to comply with the practice direction.

I intend to provide you with a full written response, but as yet I have not got adequate information to investigate your claim.

To enable me to investigate this claim I require specific information regarding the account to be provided forthwith. Given that this matter is now the subject of legal proceedings, you are obliged to disclose under the Civil Procedure Rules, the information and documents detailed below.

If you fail to disclose this information, I may apply to the court under Part 18 and part 31 of the civil procedure rules.

I will be unable to respond to your claim without this information, and by failing to supply it before starting legal action you would breach the overriding objective of the Civil Procedure Rules.

 

Request for disclosure;

I request that you send me information vital to investigating your claims, including:

1. A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. All records you hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

a. A transcript of all transactions, including charges, fees, interest, repayments and payments and both the original amount of the loan and any repayments made to it the account.

b. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor.

c. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual

intervention in relation to my account formerly held with HFC Bank Ltd.

d. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

e. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

f. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

g. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

h. A genuine copy of any deed of assignment, or proof that you have a legal right to this money.

i. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

j. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

3. Any other documents you will seek to rely upon in court.

4. A copy of your complaints procedure, as required by the Consumer Credit Act 2006.

5. Clarification of the date you acquired the debt, what organisation you acquired it from, their registered office, their company number (if any) and what legal title they had to this debt, and what credit license number they had at the time that the debt was purchased or entered into.

 

Please note, I will respond to your claim in full within 28 days of your providing this information. I must advise you that if the information is not forthcoming, or if you start proceedings without furnishing this information, it will be reported to the Court that you are denying me the opportunity

to settle this matter amicably.

 

Yours Faithfully,

Edit to suit.

 

Best wishes, Dave.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant. Those idiots at Lowells will be getting another copy of that from me if I get the court letter. So far, just a copy of their complaints procedure saying that they reply in 5 working days - sent nearly 2 weeks after they signed for the complaint.

No CCA, no explanation of why the `phone calls continue weeks after they signed for the letter saying I am not to be contacted by `phone.

Are they stupid, or do they hope that we are?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bbanful, CCA is the Consumer Credit Act 1974, now a CCA request is a legal request under sections 77 - 79 of this Act.

Basically this demands that the creditor supplies a true copy of the executed credit agreement that you signed when you started the loan.

s77 - Fixed sum amounts

s78 - Variable sum eg credit card

s79 Hire purchase..

There are some time limits involved.

It is best to send this request via recorded/special delivery as there are some inportant deadlines to observe.

 

After 12 WORKING days the "debt" is in default and stays that way until the request is complied with.

If a FURTHER month passes then the DCA has committed a summary criminal offence and the matter should be referred to Trading Standards for action.

 

The Act can be found here: http://www.fisa.co.uk/downloads/CCA%201974.pdf

 

Hope this helps

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I am trying to get on top of my debts. I have just managed to have a £19.99 debt that spiralled to over £700 written off after refusing to pay and requesting original credit agreements as well as their terms and conditions and coppies of statements. I intend to accept their offer to close the account without further action agaist me but I still want to know how they managed to get the amount to that figure. I also have a couple of credit card debts with ccj's that I want to deal with any help and advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...