Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New Claim - Another Capital One


doo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6118 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well have just finished a successful claim with Halifax so have switched attention to cap one. Am claiming on two accounts, mine and hubbys, sent off SAR and so awaiting statements. While I twiddle my thumbs I am very interest in claiming contractual interest. Have many claims been won by using this rate of interest - have been reading threads but they are still ongoing. Also if anyone can help in simplistic terms - I can start doing some practice runs (Bill are you there - you seem to be the contractual king).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 328
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Doo,

 

Like you I have just finished with Halifax. I claimed "simple" contractual interest, which they initially resisted.

 

However by the time the claim was lodged they finally relented and paid up at 29.8%. They did fail to pay the daily rate of interest, but after pointing out my claim was still ready at court they finally paid that up.

 

I am now on to Crapitol and their interest rate for classic customers is 34.9%.

 

If you search the various forums you'll find quite a bit on contractual interest. The simplistic view is that because the charges are without your permission and are unlawful then you are entitled to reciprocate the interest onto their debt with you.

 

You could charge them compounded contractual interest, which will give you a better return (if they pay up), however I found that to be complicated, therefore I've gone for simple interest at the applicable rate.

 

I have an amended N1 template giving the judge a range of options, ie the higher unauthorised interest rate, if not the lower authorised interest rate, failing that the statutory 8% rate. If it does end up in court at least the judge can see that you have thought about the various options.

 

For simple interest calculation the Vamp spread sheets are fine with a bit of tweaking .....................

 

Good luck - Go for it :-):-):-):lol::lol::lol:

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:smile: Thanks for that, will have a look at templates, just used the simple one for my halifax claim - is this what I use but change the interest charged (hope this is not a stupid question). Will find your thread so I can follow how your claim is going, may have to get back to you at a later date with help for NI, sounds like you have it sorted. Much appreciated.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh happy days..... Received statements and found £1,084 - I owe them £1,213 so with a bit of interest should hopefully cancel this debt out, not bothered if I don't see any money, just want this debt cleared.

 

However have found on file they issued me with a default in July 06 this year, balance then was £1,313 - does anyone think I have a chance of getting this removed? All the cases I have read none have been successful so not sure it is worth the hassle - but to argue a point I suppose would not have defaulted had they not imposed ridiculous charges. Need advice on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, have spent as much of today as poss trying to work out CCI. I thought I would x purchase interest rate by 12, bit confusing as I have quite a few different interest rates, which one should I use, perhaps the lowest to be safe?Have looked at various spreadsheets and have read somewhere to use No.13 but can't work it out - can you change the interest rate. Help needed please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, have spent as much of today as poss trying to work out CCI. I thought I would x purchase interest rate by 12, bit confusing as I have quite a few different interest rates, which one should I use, perhaps the lowest to be safe?Have looked at various spreadsheets and have read somewhere to use No.13 but can't work it out - can you change the interest rate. Help needed please.

 

Whats the APR rate of the card you had/have as you can use this. Crap one classic is 34.94% if I remember rightly.

 

Add this into the interest bit on spreddie and the rest is calculated all you should need to do is add the date, charge description, amd charge amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doo,

 

Make sure you read up on the various ways of applying contractual. Such as http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/18313-why-no-one-claiming.html

 

You can apply simple interest or compound interest. There are conflicting views as to whether it is applicable or not. It has not as yet been tested.

 

My personal view is that if you get the balance right in making the bank pay a fair amount back to you, then you wont be the one in court arguing why it is applicable.

 

I dont want to put you off. I was successful in my first use of it and I hope to be in my next. But this is a help forum, it is you who has to make the decisions and face the consequences.

 

Sheet 13 is ok to use, you need to make adjustments by making the calculations of that the multiplier for your rate is. For Crapital1 34.9% I am using 0.0009572.

 

Hope I haven't scared you, it is not that difficult, however to be fair to you you need to understand the potential consequences of all this. ie explaining it all to judge to win your case.

 

Good luck ............ :D:D:D:D:D

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks Tanzarelli, we have started spreadsheet put in charge, date, amount but it isn't adding up the interest only the charges are adding up the interest column does nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the sergeant, yes thanks for all that, thats why I am going to multiply my lowest monthly purchase interest by 12, I know it works out lower than card APR but I feel it is fair. I have just finished halifax claim but just used simple spreadsheet with 8%. Am happy with interest rate and as you say it is my decision and yes I think we all have to realise that at the end of the day we could end up in court. We are trying with spreadsheet 13 but as you can see in post 10 the interest is not adding up so help needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Doo - I followed your link here.

 

Do NOT multiply the monthly rate on your statements by 12 - that gives the wrong result. It's best to get the current annual rate from Crapitall's website, as it is the currrent rate that we must use throughout the claim. I believe 34.9% may well be right - but you should check.

 

You ONLY use one rate of interest throughout the whole spreadsheet, and you MUST put this in at the top of the sheet, along with the correct date.

 

You may have missed them, but there are 2 brief guides at the top of the Google Chambers index page. Have a read of those - they're fairly short, but useful.

 

HTH, matey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doo,

 

What I did with Halifax claim was go to my local county court with my N1 (The hard copy version of MCOL for your local county court) There is no space restrictions on this one. I then set out the alternatives, Unauthorised borrowing rate, authorised borrowing rate and failing all that the 8% statutory rate.

 

Anyway your difficulties with the spreadsheet, I edited the available ones, for Crapital I use =SUM(C8*0.0009572)*E8, where C8 refers to the cell where the penalty fee is, and E8 is the cell where the number of days since the charge was made is.

 

Hope that helps. :D

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway your difficulties with the spreadsheet, I edited the available ones, for Crapital I use =SUM(C8*0.0009572)*E8, where C8 refers to the cell where the penalty fee is, and E8 is the cell where the number of days since the charge was made is.

:D

Sorry, I thought you were using one of Vamps compound interest sheets. What you are doing here is calculating simple interest, not compound. As this is neither statutory nor contractual, I would suggest you re-think this, as you will have no legal basis for your claim.

 

PS - You will also be losing out on some possibly serious dosh !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thesergeant. thanks will check this out.

 

bill-k, thanks for getting in touch, will only use one rate, will go now and read the guides, made a start but as I say could not get the column with interest activated, just stayed the same. Off to do some reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, are seriously contemplating this, have you got experience of this on your claim, must find your thread and read it.

 

Hi doo, I am claiming it on two claims ((the relevant one to your thread) is with Capital One for my O/H and he is at court stage, papers served claiming the lower rate, but that was his choice!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/55155-capital-one-no-offer.html

 

seargant is right it is entirely up to you an you have to feel entirely happy with your choice!

 

P.S I have used Vamp,s spreadsheet 13 for both claims (simple)

 

Milly X:)

CAPITAL ONE (O/H!): Won £1864.63 including contractual :D

GE MONEY: WON £266.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

millymollymoo, good point on 8% will do same. Am just waiting for more help with spreadsheets, am now confused as to which one to use. Need to get this right so am not going to rush it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill-k,

 

Yes you are right. However due to the controversy over the legitimacy of contractual interest I have taken the view that there is a need to apply a balance, due to the possibility of challenge.

 

Applying contractual "simple" interest, may attract a reduced possibility of legal challenge.

 

I have gone through many of the threads referring to contractual interest. There are numerous views on the issue. From the this is not applicable to the the be damned with it go for the jugular approach.

 

What I decide to apply is my approach. I have stated this in my prelim letter and in the LBA on route. It worked with the Halifax. Most likely on the basis that it is not worth challenging, hopefully that will be the same next time. Compounding my current claim adds over £1000 to the amount. At some point the balance will be tipped and it will be worth the bank sending the legal boffins in.

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I understood when I asked and wait for bill on this!!!

 

No 13 is contractual compounded interest but simple (no balances required) and not trying to work out what portion of the interest charged is due to charges. It is purely contractual compound on the penalty charge from the date applied to current date of prelim sending!!

 

Bill am I right?

 

Milly X:)

CAPITAL ONE (O/H!): Won £1864.63 including contractual :D

GE MONEY: WON £266.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

bill-k, am I not right then in using No: 13 in vamps chamber?

Yes, but why are you changing the calculation formula from compound to simple interest ? Contractual interest has to be applied at the contractual rate, which is whatever Crapitall's current annual rate is, and compounded daily. Any other way of applying the interest is not contractual. If you are going to claim simple interest, then you will have to use 8%, as statutory interest is the only simple interest you can lawfully claim here.

If you want to accept a lower offer when they make it, then by all means do - that is indeed your choice. But if you demostrate to C1 that you don't really understand what your claim is based on by claiming just simple interest, they may well decide that YOUR claim is the one that they will take up the steps and win. Don't give them that opportunity.

Start with the max. you are entitled to, then work down from there. Don't start halfway down the ladder with a nondescript rate - that is not good business, and certainly not good law, IMHO, matey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill-k,

 

Yes you are right. However due to the controversy over the legitimacy of contractual interest I have taken the view that there is a need to apply a balance, due to the possibility of challenge.

 

Applying contractual "simple" interest, may attract a reduced possibility of legal challenge.

 

I have gone through many of the threads referring to contractual interest. There are numerous views on the issue. From the this is not applicable to the the be damned with it go for the jugular approach.

 

What I decide to apply is my approach. I have stated this in my prelim letter and in the LBA on route. It worked with the Halifax. Most likely on the basis that it is not worth challenging, hopefully that will be the same next time. Compounding my current claim adds over £1000 to the amount. At some point the balance will be tipped and it will be worth the bank sending the legal boffins in.

 

 

My reasoning for going with 13 too, however did not adjust any formula, left the sheet exactly as it was for true compound interest!:)

 

Milly X:)

  • Haha 1

CAPITAL ONE (O/H!): Won £1864.63 including contractual :D

GE MONEY: WON £266.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks for above posts, I take on board what you say bill-k on interest, and I did go on capital one site to check interest rate on credit cards but it seems so high, read other points and it all gets sooo confusing.

Anyway back to spreadsheet, when I open No 13 there is an interest rate showing of 18.2 and so thought I obviously had to change it (hope I am not sounding too stupid, but I know lots of people have strugged and given up). I think I need an idiots guide, both hubby and I cannot work it out, we did normal spready for halifax and that was easy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks for above posts, I take on board what you say bill-k on interest, and I did go on capital one site to check interest rate on credit cards but it seems so high, read other points and it all gets sooo confusing.

I have used that rate and they have paid.

Anyway back to spreadsheet, when I open No 13 there is an interest rate showing of 18.2 and so thought I obviously had to change it (hope I am not sounding too stupid, but I know lots of people have strugged and given up).

There are sample figures in the sheet, just to get you started. You have to put your own figures in !! Make sure that you have put the interest rate and the date in the boxes near the top. Then carry on filling it in (overwrite the first line with your figures !!)

I think I need an idiots guide, both hubby and I cannot work it out, we did normal spready for halifax and that was easy.

Here it is, remember ? >

You may have missed them, but there are 2 brief guides at the top of the Google Chambers index page. Have a read of those - they're fairly short, but useful.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...