Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

northern Bank charges reclaim **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1868 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't agree to this meeting, unless the terms of the meeting are agreed in advance,

 

Indicate that you are willing to meet to discuss your ongoing dispute for unfair charges, but that, due to impending legal action, you are not prepared to discuss any other business until this matter is resolved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 254
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

you have asked them to enter into frank and meaningful discussion about this matter, therefore your only reply should be in writing, letting them know that whilst you are willing to discuss the issues at hand, you would be far more comfortable doing this in a written format. to reject a meeting i think would do you no harm, but you must display a willingness to resolve this without court

 

 

hope this makes sense

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have asked them to enter into frank and meaningful discussion about this matter, therefore your only reply should be in writing, letting them know that whilst you are willing to discuss the issues at hand, you would be far more comfortable doing this in a written format. to reject a meeting i think would do you no harm, but you must display a willingness to resolve this without court

 

 

hope this makes sense

 

understand where you're coming from Aid.....but I have been dealing with head office in Belfast.This lady (area manager)rings me up after I sent a letter to the branch and claims not to know what's going on???I have drawn 3 possible conclusions here-

 

a.Northern internal communication is rubbish if she genuinely hasn't a clue what all this is about.(HIGHLY UNLIKELY)

b.This woman thinks I'm stupid and can manipulate me to their way of thinking-if she is playing the "naive card",she is trying it on with the wrong guy-I'm much too long in the tooth for that.(HIGHLY PROBABLE)

c.I am being set up for a serious grilling session.(A SERIOUS POSSIBILITY)

 

Why would they want to use a minnion when the big decisions are made in Belfast.I want to talk to someone who has the authority then and there to settle this before going to court.I'm not interested in some kind of "shuttle diplomacy" arrangment.As this is in the hands of the court,I feel it is only right to conduct all communication in writing-then there can be no ambiguity or incorrect recollections of conversations which may or may not have taken place.....

 

I would be EXTREMELY wary of advising anyone to go down this route.Too many pitfalls for the unwary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Area manager should be in a position to make decisions on refunding your account. Though I agree with you that is a bit suspect that she is unaware of what is going on.

 

Be careful though, big aid has a point, you must be able to show the court your willingness to mitigate.

 

Very simple, if you ask her has she the authority to deal with your complaint and rectify the situation. If she does, agree to discuss the complaint, and the complaint only.

 

If she doesn't , tell her you will discuss it with the organ grinder and not the monkey

Link to post
Share on other sites

i couldn't agree more with your analysis of this

i pick option c-- you are being set up for a grilling

 

you still have to appear like the most reasonable, approachable, hard done by person for miles around.

what you think of them and what they think of you doesn't matter anymore, it's what a judge thinks of both of you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I agree with BigAid on your need to appear approachable, I totally agree with you on your preferred method of...

 

As this is in the hands of the court,I feel it is only right to conduct all communication in writing-then there can be no ambiguity or incorrect recollections of conversations which may or may not have taken place.....

 

If you did meet with them and things go pear-shaped, you will obviously then revert to the court action. They, however, will have it to say that you broke of negotiations with them. FWIW, I think you should stick to the written avenue.

 

Best wishes

 

mori

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court office has just sent us a copy of their notice of dispute-

 

they intend to dispute on these grounds

 

1.The charges are levied in accordance with contract and are charges previously advised to the applicant

 

2.the charges are not in breach of the unfair terms in consumer contracts regualtions 1999

 

comments please...... ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lickthewallfatboy

 

The dispute is very similar to the one First Trust have lodged in my case:

 

'The claim is denied. The Respondent disputes the claim. The money claimed is not due and owing to the applicant and all fees and charges levied were done on foot of the terms and conditions which governed the aggreement between the applicant and the respondent'

 

I think they are just standard disputes. Let them argue in court that the charges are not contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts regs - I don't think they will have a leg to stand on.

 

I'm just sorry my court case is so far away - but then they say patience is a virtue.

 

Flo

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been doing some nosing around this morning,and have discovered something very interesting.As you know,the BIG 4 have sister companies in the Irish Republic.Well,I have discovered that Northern's other half down south is National Irish Bank Ltd-and what did I discover on their website?

 

From the NIB Ltd website,and I quote-(items in brackets and italics mine)

 

 

REFERRAL FEES(not applicable to accounts opened after 18th April 2006)

when cheques and debits collectively exceed the credit limits or cause an account to overdraw without permission a charge of 4 Euro (very roughly £2.70)per item presented will be applied,up to a maximum of 22.20 EURO PER DAY(roughly £15 MAXIMUM PER DAY)

 

UNPAID ITEMS OUT-APPLICABLE TO ALL ACCOUNTS-when an item is returned unpaid from your account a charge of 10 Euro(roughly £7) PER ITEM IS LEVIED.”

 

 

END

 

a letter has been drafted to the Northern pointing this out-or should I hold this back for court?I would love to let them know that I am aware of this and it might loosen things up a bit.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

compare how we are being ****** by the equaivalent charges levied in the Irish Republic-and remember the figures are in euro!!

 

1 EUR0 = roughly 68 PENCE

 

ULSTER BANK(PART OF RBOS)-

http://www.ulsterbank.ie/content/ri/personal/current_accounts/downloads/Guide_to_Personal_CAccFees_and_Interest.pdf

 

ULSTER BANK CREDIT CARD(RBOS)

Ulster Bank: Credit Cards - Credit Card Rates

 

 

BOS Ireland Credit card

Bank of Scotland (Ireland) :: Credit Cards :: Irish Credit Card Application for Bank of Scotland Plastic Credit Card

 

 

That's all I've got so far.....

 

Please do not post libelous comments thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a look at what the BIG 4 charge across the border compared to us-

 

ULSTER BANK(PART OF RBOS)-

http://www.ulsterbank.ie/content/ri/...d_Interest.pdf

 

ULSTER BANK CREDIT CARD(RBOS)

Ulster Bank: Credit Cards - Credit Card Rates

 

NORTHERN BANK (NATIONAL IRISH BANK)-FROM THEIR WEBSITE

REFERRAL FEES(not applicable to accounts opened after 18th April 2006)

when cheques and debits collectively exceed the credit limits or cause an account to overdraw without permission a charge of 4 Euro (very roughly £2.70)per item presented will be applied,up to a maximum of 22.20 EURO PER DAY(roughly £15 MAXIMUM PER DAY)

 

UNPAID ITEMS OUT-APPLICABLE TO ALL ACCOUNTS-when an item is returned unpaid from your account a charge of 10 Euro(roughly £7) PER ITEM IS LEVIED.”

FIRST TRUST (AIB)

http://www.aib.ie/servlet/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application/pdf%0D%0AContent-Disposition%3A+inline%3B+filename%3DPersonal%20Current%20Account%20Fees%20and%20Charges.pdf%0D%0AMDT-Type%3A+abinary%3B+charset%3DUTF-8&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1141408093639&csblobid=1141322474997

 

AIB Personal Finance

 

BANK OF IRELAND

http://www.bankofireland.ie/html/gws/includes/personal/pdfs/fees_charges.pdf

 

another string to our bows perhaps???

Link to post
Share on other sites

ulster bank here still charging £30

my wifes acc is mucked up

keep taking it out and putting it back in

8 times already

take it out the comp thinks shes over her limit then they put it in

so same thing happens next month

s.a.r handed to manager-2-8-06

aknowledgement letter recieved 4-8-06

letter from dpm 10-8-06

Data Protection Act - Non-Compliance 10 days left 29-8-06

statements recieved 31/8/06

prelim letter 1/9/06

letter recieved from cru 9/9/06

lba-sent 15-9-06

small claims started 17-9-06

agreed to settle

with condition removed that i cant make another claim

waiting for funds

part 2

small claims for £893 filed 14/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been a bit of a busy week then!!

 

I spend a good deal of thim in the ROI(Republic of Ireland) The Nat Irish Bank also bought by the Dansk Bank just prior to the Bank robbery(from the Bank of Australia) are even having all their external signage done to match the Northern, not the case before. I will grab a copy of their charges and contract details during the week this week, you will find them interesting to compare. I have found the same with the Ulster Bank, the difference in charges north and south are dumbfounding given they have the same, cost base....

 

To be honest I cannot see how they can defend their charges. How can I put this, the Irish banks are the most profitable in the whole of Europe, hence Dansk Banks purchase of the NB and NIB but get this the Northern Irish Banks are the most profitable of all. We get so ripped off.

 

Fact Dansk Bank Bought NB because it was the most profitable bank in Europe. I think there may well be a possiblity that the Dansk bank will just pay up all the cases claimed, as most of the money they will be able to claw back from the Bank of Austraila (covered by the purchase contract between the two banks), and it would be better as a new comer to the market to take some loss leaders and distance themselves from that immoral banking as practiced by the Bank of Australia and somewhat poetically get the Bank of Oz to pay for it. Remember this Aquisition by the Dansk Bank took place 2 days before the NB was robbed...I love it the NB must feel they are in a quagmire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've posted the links to the Irish equivalent of our banks here- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/20574-northern-ireland-members-look.html

 

-all the charges are there in black and white for everyone to see.

 

Oh and by the way,that area manager has written to me asking for a meeting with herself and our branch manager.I will be constructing a suitable reply hopefully this evening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent this letter to the area manager on 7 August(the one who was asking us to go for an interview.)

 

 

 

NORTHERN BANK

 

 

7 AUGUST 2006

 

Dear Ms xxxxxxxx

 

We are in receipt of your letter of 3rd August.

 

Thank you for your offer of a meeting.As you will be aware,this matter is currently the subject of a county court action,and has been allocated a court date since Northern filed a Notice of Dispute.

 

We must point out at this stage that any unwillingness to enter into a meaningful dialogue does not originate with us.We wrote to Donegall Square on more than one occasion on the matter of Data Processing Act non-compliance,and in an attempt to resolve this matter.On 15th July,we received a letter from Norma Goodison,Service Recovery Manager, quote –

 

"further to our letter of 26 June

 

as Court proceedings have been issued against the bank it would be inappropriate for us to comment on the issues raised in your letters of 6 and 22 June 2006 at this time

 

I trust that you will understand our position

 

Norma Goodison

 

Service Recovery Officer"

 

 

This would seem to make it clear that Northern are unwilling to enter into a meaningful dialogue at this point.

 

 

You will of course appreciate that we would prefer to have a written record of all communication in this matter.However,if the following criteria can be met in full,the possibility of a meeting would not be ruled out -

 

1.Confirmation that you personally are in an executive position to resolve this matter fully to our satisfaction,at any meeting which may be arranged.

 

2.Confirmation that any settlement will not result in either-

a).closure of our accounts

b).adjustment downwards in the level of overdraft limit currently applicable

 

3.Any meeting which would be agreed to, would take place at a neutral venue to be decided by ourselves.

 

4.Any meeting to involve you, and you alone.

 

5.A single item agenda-ie the full reimbursement of the charges levied on our accounts since they were opened.

 

6.All matters settled at any such meeting shall be confirmed in writing before the meeting would be concluded.

 

 

 

 

We look forward to receiving your reply in this matter.

 

 

Mr and Mrs LTWF

 

 

 

 

Strangely,it seems to have gone all quiet over there..... ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...