Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, hope that you can help with the PCN detailed below, unfortunately I have entered into correspondence (appeal) and identified the driver, hope that this doesn't have too much of an impact! On 26/05/2024 the driver entered the ANPR controlled car park to park but was unable to find suitable parking due to the car park being very busy. This took 11 minutes according to Wise ANPR details, this was due to other vehicles looking for parking and impeding the driver's progress. This has been appealed to both Wise Parking and IAS and the appeal has been rejected by both; unfortunately, the driver has been identified on the appeal. Note: the appeal response from Wise was not received until 04/07/2024, wise state (after me chasing) that it was sent by email on 17/05/2024 but this was not received and not in junk mail. I have completed the form below and attached correspondence (post and email) as a single pdf Please let me know if you need anything else.   1 Date of the infringement 26/05/2024   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 29/05/2024   3 Date received Around 04/06/2024   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]  Y   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Y Unable to find /access details of my appeal to Wise, however I will have revealed the identity of the driver My appeal to IAS: You completed the appeal on 06/07/2024 23:38:42. The car was not parked on this land. The reason for this was that there were no available parking spaces. I drove the car around the car park a few times searching for a space but was unable to obtain a space due to it being busy. I then left the car park without parking, I therefor did not make use of their facility or have the opportunity to check their terms and conditions as I did not leave the car. The appellant made their response on 08/07/2024 09:52:52. As I did not park due to lack of opportunity a "parking" charge is not appropriate. As can be seen from the ticket, I was only onsite for a few minutes which backs up my assertion that I did not park. No evidence has been provided that I did park, only that I entered and left 11 minutes later.   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Y   7 Who is the parking company? Wise Parking   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Chapel Point, Chapel St Leonards   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here I have received a response from both Wise and IAS rejecting my appeal     Wise Parking PCN - 26-05-2024.pdf
    • You mean the mediation Service. It's not from the court  Offering a date and time?  Dx   
    • Equivo are applying for an interim charging order although I know why they want to do this, I find it to be very unjust and needless in my point of view! and don't know why there is a continuing need to harrass me with a Charging Order. No payments have been missed since the order was made and a total of £360 paid to date The debt amount has not been reduced as they keep adding interest, the original debt was £1500 it now stands at £1700 The judgement didn't order a payment plan but we have agreed to one and for three years they have accepted my payment...not sure if that relevant? Also I live with my partner and they have sent her the same as she has a 50% claim to the property how can I stop this? many thanks Webbs   Interim Charging Order Creation Finance Old Flybe Card.pdf
    • Good. Hopefully you've done the reading and you know how it all works from now.  However, please will you not leave things to the last moment in future.  We have our work cut out as it is and to try and help you catch up with deadlines put extra strain on us which as an unpaid volunteer group, I don't think we should need to do
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Question for those claiming off Nationwide now and successful claimers...


Badass01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6396 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm currently claiming a lot of money from 2002 - 2004.

 

If you look at your bank statements - at the end of the statement, they have an additional page with all the charges:

 

For example: 26th Feb '02 - £25 as Unpaid cheque fee

 

Then, at the bottom of that very page they tell you that the aforementioned amount will be debited from your account 21 days later.

 

So 21 days later, they take the money from your account.

 

Now, when you write to them, detailing charges, do you mention the date they notified your of the charge (i.e. the date the charge was put on) or the date they debited the money from your account?

 

Furthermore, if a notice of 21 days has been given on their behalf, is it still plausible to claim back interest charged 21 days later - as they have already warned you, and you have had the time to make sure you credit your account by the required amount.

 

Any advice and help on this matter is greatly appreciated.

 

B.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Badass01 and welcome.

 

You should reclaim from the date the charges were deducted from your account and yes you can reclaim even though you were warned that they were going to make the charge.

 

Furthermore since you say that you have substantial charges going back a number of years you really should consider reclaiming contractual interest - ie. the interest you have paid to Nationwide for these charges. There are loads of threads on this but one is http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/18313-why-no-one-claiming.html and another one which is well worth listening to, though it primarily relates to Scottish claims is http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/cag-radio/ which should help to clarify the compound interest point. The point here is that other people have claimed contractual interest and their claims have gone from around £3K to around £9K!

 

What stage are you at with your claim?

 

Thank you for this information. I have got a subject access request from the bank, and this has allowed me to see all the charges they have made. I have calculated this to be around £580 but have yet to add interest to that figure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...