Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mass complaint ;Add your name here if a dca has acted incorrectly with your account.


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4075 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

CAPQUEST and H.L. LEGAL, firstly CAPQUEST I have paid these parasites hundreds of pounds for nearly 2 years and they claim i owe still around the same as i did back in 05! Thanks to H.L. LEGAL who add to my account when i cant afford to pay £190 each time for court costs and solicitors costs ( even though they are not supposed to be solicitors from what i read on here!! ) what apt timing finding this board i have only just opened another H.L.LEGAL notice for demand of £110 court costs and £80 solicitors fees only 30 mins ago!! im now going back to the board for searching the cca request i gotta do something these people are doing my head in!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I reckon I ought to add Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd here - cause CAP1 just wrote to me saying that they have passed my account to them!!!!!

 

Despite CAP1 saying they'd taken the charges off the ammount defaulted back in Dec 2006 - they now have sent the "whole" amount to this crowd - THEY ARE HAVING A LAUGH!!!

 

CAP1 haven't completed the SAR since August 2006 - haven't completed the CCA request - and now they set their dogs on me cause I challenged them!! Sure hopes this gets to court cause I plan to wipe the floor with CAP1 and their dogs!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

my friend's son is having a huge problem with callserve. i wondered which route you had taken to settle your issues with them and if you could give me some pointers please?

 

many thanks

Me v NatWest £1.5k settled after Disc App

Jo v Barclaycard settled after Disc App

Jo v Cap 1 settled after Disc App

Jo v Abbey Disc App sent to court

Jo v Natwest cag3 let due

Nikkii v Barclays judgement in default against Barclays

Nikkii v B’card directions returned

Nikkii v Natwest settled

Laura v Lloyds – directions & aq sent

Luke v Lloyds – AQ & directions sent to court

Mark v Halifax – settled

Liam v A&L settled

Liam v Lloyds part settled - still going

Vanya v RBOS, CAG 3 let sent

Vanya v RBOS Awaiting statements

Vanya v Virgin issue on 30/03

Carl v Natwest settled

Dean v Barclays – disc app issued

Dean v B’card – disc app issued

Dean v Cap 1 – awaiting statements

(another 5 files that won't fit) busy me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Martin, I've not been around for ages, back at University and life in general!

I'll post back with my details but suffice to say, BOS employing 6 different DCAs and 3 different so-called 'solicitors' for two accounts is below the belt...

 

i'll have more details later, I'm skiving in the library at uni so I really should get some work done :)

Lloyds Current A/C DPA sent 7th May 2009 Closed and charges wiped Summer 2010.

 

Barclays A/C DPA sent 4th June 2009: no reply, no correspondence as of 2011.

 

Littlewoods Data Protection Act Section 10 sent 09/06/2006 - Fraudulent A/C closed and CRA data removed November 2006.

 

HSBC Default & Debt wiped March 2009 (6 yr Statute barred reached)

 

RBS - Claim 1 - Settled in FULL £766.00 20/06/2006.

RBS - Claim 2 - Settled in FULL £777.95 08/09/2006

 

 

BOS A/C No. 1 & 2

Amount - £586.39 claim plus 8% interest

SETTLED IN FULL 08/09/2006 - CHEQUE FOR £625.25

 

Halifax Visa Data Protection Act Disclosure Received

 

First Direct Data Protection Act Disclosure received

Link to post
Share on other sites

My vote goes to Lowell finance, aka, capt 1 aka Hamptons for total disregard of cca requests, and continuously harrassing and bullying over debts that are in dispute.

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

ECI Debt for chasing something over 10 years old and trying to forec me into making a payment over the phone, even though I disputed the debt existed (who can remember ten years ago at Uni? I believe far too much cider was involved ...)

 

Moorcroft/Wescot/Roxburghe/Apex/BCW - chasing the same two debts at the same time. CCA's went in the poss yesterday.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

moorcroft i have just sent them my letter of complaint again since they nicked a quid from me they are now doing the silent phone calls again ive had six this week,really getting very angry but i did hear dont get angry get even so this i will do

Link to post
Share on other sites

WESCOT CREDIT SERVICES LTD.

 

I am claiming refund of all monies paid to them and I complained to Hull TS because Wescot couldnt provide me with a copy agreement or deed of assignment within 30 days. Wescot admitted they didnt have a copy of the agreement and said they would try to get one off HFC who they bought the debt off. They told me they bought the debt but have never sent me a deed of assignment.

 

I complained to Hull TS and apparently Wescot Credit Services Ltd (who I am claiming against) do not own the debt they are just collecting it on behalf of The Wescot Group! According to Hull TS this means they do not have to have the correct documents and they have done nothing to break the law, blah blah blah.

 

Im at the end of my tether with these people, and TS are not getting the point!

 

Anna

Link to post
Share on other sites

debitas for cap one as after making regular payments then loosing job they were unwilling to reduce payments and wanted it paid in full when i cancelled dd. they now phone almost everyday and i'm refusing to pay more as i sent SAR for charges and they prob owe me more than i owe them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bcw group and moorcroft for chasing the same debt at the same time.

moorcroft are bl**dy obnoxious and bcw don't appear to own any stationary... just a phone with a shouty kid on the other end.

 

Ah yes, BCW. They like to conduct all of their business via the telephone. I have posted on a couple of threads for them.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/47693-buchanan-clark-wells-scotcall.html#post382663

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as a side issue - I saw a guy from the Credit Services Association on Watchdog the other night saying that his Association had only received 77 complaints last year about DCAs. He seemed to think that this was because most of his members play by the rules. I suspect that the truth has more to do with the fact that most people

 

A. Have little faith in an industry body "policing its' own"

 

B. Are so stressed about being chased/ relieved when they have sorted

the problem out that they don't want the stress of dragging it out any

further.

 

C. Know about complaining to the OFT but, don't realise that they can also lodge a complaint with the CSA.

 

All of the above concerns are understandable and, to be honest I have lodged complaints with the OFT and Trading Standards but, not yet with the CSA for much the same reasons. However, the CSA code of practice claims to expect members to abide by the OFT guidelines and many members are clearly not. I am going to go through my list of complaints and send each one to the CSA and I would urge other posters to do the same if they feel that they have a legitimate complaint and the DCA is a member of the CSA.

 

I know that it is an industry body regulating its own members but, at the moment it can justifiably say that if people don't complain then, they can't investigate.

 

Here is a link to their website for the code of practice etc

 

Home Page

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

Has anyone sent this thread to the CSA and Watchdog?. It's up to 61 complaints, this should help knock the smugness off his face

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sarahpp,

 

I agree with this - I also complained to OFT and TS - didn't realise that I could complain to CSA too. I will follow the link and will send copies of my compalints to them etc.. - if nothing else it backs up that there are actually problems out here?

 

I am sure others have done similar too and could copy complaints to CSA too ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sarahpp,

 

I agree with this - I also complained to OFT and TS - didn't realise that I could complain to CSA too. I will follow the link and will send copies of my compalints to them etc.. - if nothing else it backs up that there are actually problems out here?

 

I am sure others have done similar too and could copy complaints to CSA too ?

 

Yes, you can complain to the CSA if the firm is a member (most are). There should be a little CSA emblem somewhere on the letter if they are. I have noticed when sifting through my correspondence that even if the actual DCA isn't sometimes the solicitors they use are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

I have had my complaints zipped and ready to go for ages. Just scan and add the letters to the file as they arrive.

 

Funny thing is when I write and tell the DCA's I am reporting them to the relevant authorities they change therr tone, but I have the letters so it makes no difference. Reliable tells me my files with them are on hold. Moorcroft have back right off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember, the CSA is the body that represents the interests of DCA's - they don't act unless they get a sizeable number of complaints about the same company, and then they just expel them from the association and refer them to the OFT. It's OFT who issue licenses and have to take any complaint very seriously.

 

There has been mention that Lowell are under investigation due to the rising number of complaints about their handling of statute barred debts, and pursuing the wrong people. My complaint was dealt with individually, it was before I knew this site existed and I thought I was on my own. :-( :-(

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe

This is the reply I have just received from the CSA

 

CSA Complaints Procedure Information

Further to your recent contact, please find enclosed a copy of the Code of Practice of the Credit Services Association, which I hope will provide key information with regard to our members’ obligations. Also enclosed is an official complaints form. All formal complaints must be received in writing using this form with the authority on the last page duly signed.

Often problems can be resolved quickly and directly if you contact the CSA contact within the member company:

You state your problem is with: Moorcroft Debt Recovery

The contact there is: Andrew McRoberts Tel: 0161 477 2222

If you do wish to lodge a formal complaint with us, please note that the CSA can only deal with apparent violations of the Code of Practice.

For the purpose of clarification, the following issues are examples of those upon which we cannot act:

a) We cannot interfere in the collection procedures of members unless they violate the code.

b) We cannot consider complaints in matters which are the responsibility of our member’s clients, such as unsatisfactory goods or services supplied.

c) We cannot stop a member contacting a debtor when they are going about their legitimate business in collecting an outstanding debt for a client.

d) We cannot insist that a member double-checks the information supplied by the client in good faith.

e) If instalment arrangements have been discussed, we cannot say what is reasonable and we cannot force members to accept instalments.

f) The Association cannot involve itself in claims for compensation.

Naturally, if any of these matters can be seen to violate our code, this is a different matter and of course each case is individual, but we hope this gives you some indication of our role in the industry.

Yours sincerely

 

Claire Aynsley

Code & Compliance Executive

Credit Services Association

 

Serving the credit industry

Tel: 0191 2865656

Fax: 0191 2860900

Visit our Web site at: www.csa-uk.com

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember, the CSA is the body that represents the interests of DCA's - they don't act unless they get a sizeable number of complaints about the same company, and then they just expel them from the association and refer them to the OFT. It's OFT who issue licenses and have to take any complaint very seriously.

 

 

 

Yes, I think I covered this in my earlier post. Complaints need to be made to both organisations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Battleaxe- that reply seems almost as if it is designed to put you off making a complaint isn't it?

 

Their code of practice clearly states that they expect members to abide by the OFT guidelines so, it follows that if you are putting in an official complaint to the OFT about a specific breach of their guidelines, a complaint should also go in to the CSA about the same breach (if they are a member).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Often problems can be resolved quickly and directly if you contact the CSA contact within the member company:

 

 

The CSA contact within the Company, as all CSA member organisations will have, is almost certainly an employee of the DCA, not the CSA, and merely a 'liason'. Therein lies the problem.

 

Contacting the 'CSA contact' within the company merely alerts them to fact you are going to be difficult and need to tripped up or put off somehow.

 

The OFT is the Govt organisation that allows these people to operate, and therefore have to investigate complaints independently, and fully.

 

I'm just playing Devil's Advocate here and wondering if it's worthwhile involving the DCA's union (CSA) at all, because that is effectively what they are. I bypassed tham totally, went to OFT and caught the DCA by surprise, and unaware a complaint/investigation was coming.

 

Of course, they'd have to take notice of a mass complaint.

 

Just a thought.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take your point Danny but, I was advocating the Official Complaint route for a code violation rather than approaching the CSA rep at the DCAs. This reference from BAs reply is clearly designed to try to avoid an official complaint to the CSA direct but, I still think that Official complaints directly to both the OFT and CSA are a valid course of action. Unless of course we want the guy from the CSA sitting on a Consumer Programme next year saying that he has only received a small number of complaints and therefore this must mean that most of his members are following the code of practice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get what you mean, but CSA will go on 'Watchdog' or whatever at any time now or in the future and tell you everything's fine and dandy and someone's had their knuckles rapped, because that's what the DCA's pay their membership fees for. The CSA to defend them as a collective group, and as individual Companies.

 

A mass complaint probably should involve the CSA, you're right in that. But individuals may find they are wasting their time with the CSA. "We do have teeth you know....." to quote that guy on Watchdog. Why don't they use them to make their members toe the line?? Because it's not in their interest to bite the hand that feeds them.

 

Personally, I'd rather hit them full blast with their shields down and cloaking device disabled, and do some lasting damage. After all, isn't that what they try to do us...whether you owe the debt or not??

 

S'cuse the Star Trek stuff, I'm still a kid at heart;)

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...