Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thanks ae - yes  I understand the claims are between me and the lender.  But with regards to the order for sale the judge specifically said it is the receiver who is appointed to sell - and he hasn't/ and isn't - which is why I am asking if I can apply to the court v the receiver for an order for sale right now?   The receiver is not part of the current proceedings heading to trial.  But he is responsible for selling the property - and he has consistently rejected offers over >5y.   This is specifically why I would like to understand if I can apply to the court to enforce the sale by the receiver??? As above - The judge has said otherwise the order for sale v the lender has to be dealt with via the trial.  Which they have deliberately delayed via the adjournment. Valuation is an issue. The lender chose the valuer.  I paid but his report basically belongs to and is referred to by the lender.  He did a prof valuation without doing a site visit.  He had done a site visit 5 months earlier for different potential lender.  The 1st valuation he erroneously did as fh.  He just did a re-write 5m later - but kept the same value for lh. I had a great offer on the table from a niche buyer which would have cleared the loan and given me a lot of £s.  But the lender rushed through the repo and the buyer got spooked and ran.  The lender then slashed the price by 30%+ from their valuation (fire sale price?).  As you suggest - they fully expected potential buyers to quickly grab the property at such a discount.  But it turned out they couldn't.  The market had dropped anyway. Then covid hit.  Every potential buyer was questioning the valuation.  The lender and receivers actions have eroded the equity.  This wouldn't make sense to any normal lender.  99.9% would have just sold to the 1st buyer willing to transact.  The lender/ receiver had such a willing buyer on day 1 of marketing.  But they spent 15months trying not to sell to them.  As I said, disclosure shows the ceo wanted (wants?) to keep it for himself - so common sense didn't (doesn't) prevail.   The lender has made a £ Claim v me.  I am disputing it because I maintain it is their actions that has caused the erosion of equity/ a debt to accrue. The lender's problem now is that they have spent so much money and added so much interest over 5y that they cannot sell the property for what they need/ want.  They are trying to blame me for this.  But it is their fault; not mine - because I am not in possession or in charge of selling it. As I also said above - if there is some legal reason why I cannot make an application to the court for an order for the receiver to sell - then can I ask the other entity which has a charging order and threatened to do so. ???    
    • We registered our child with a nursery last year for a June 2024 start date. This was before how the new 15 hours free childcare was going to work. At the time my wife paid a £50 deposit. A few weeks ago they sent out an email about how the new funding was going to work. The nurseries can use it as they wish and they said if the child wants to come for one full day we still have to pay £50 and we can't use all the hours for one day. They also drastically increased their day rate. As a result of this we were looking elsewhere and have found a much cheaper nursery so we are changing.  The original nursery now said you only get the deposit back if she starts because it comes out of the first month of fees. I don't think we filled any any form or anything so there were no terms and conditions. Are we entitled to get the deposit back or is it our fault for not asking what the terms were when we paid. 
    • Hi Baldilocks. Welcome to CAG. I've done some minor formatting edits to your post to make it easier to read for people on mobile. Try to keep to 1 or 2 sentences max before creating a line break in your post. It's the Consumer Rights Act 2015, not the Sale of Goods Act 2015. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 superseded The Sale Of Goods Act 1979 and the latter does not apply as I imagine this purchase was made after 1st October 2015. Can you confirm the make and model of the vehicle? Some vehicles have their service history stored within the on board computers now or have it available to view online at any point. How did you pay for the vehicle? Finance (what type), Debit/Credit Card etc? I would argue, that should the above points not be correct, you would be right to claim that the goods are not as described under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.  
    • Thanks everyone for all your help, but unfortunately my case was dismissed. This is the 2nd time I've had this happen now so I doubt ill be taking on any parking firms in future sadly. The judge said I lost it on the grounds that the sign said I had 28 days to declare who the owner of the vehicle was, and said I should have complied with this.  My costs are Judgment for the claimant £133.33 Issue fee Hearing fee Solicitors costs - total £265 grand total £398.33 Do those costs look about right?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mass complaint ;Add your name here if a dca has acted incorrectly with your account.


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4075 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest blackie

Link Financial phone a neighbour requesting my oh get in touch as a matter of urgency, sending silly postcards, threatening letters, ignoring SAR. Good luck to the boss though building his new house.

 

Also HFO, and a Mr DeSilva who works for them, for threatening my family, telling my OH that he would not like what HFO were capable of doing. Telling phoning at ungodly hours of the night, Turnbull Rutherfords, one in the same for the unscrupulous practices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Castaway,

 

If you go to the home page, and then press "Welcome to the Consumer Forum" it will then come up with "post new thread" just a bit down on the left hand side.

 

Put mackenzie hall in your thread title because then others dealing with them will pick up.

 

Have you made any payments on this account since 2002? This is very important because if you haven't it is statute barred anyway and you can tell them to shove it.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are fed up of reading the stories about the Dcas who continually flout laws and principles and do not act responsibly.Following all your requests,you are invited to add your user name here together with the dca or firm of baliffs that you wish to complain about.Just add a few lines of your complaint.

Once we have a list we can then get something drafted to launch a bulk complaint to Consumer direct The FSO the others who are required to take up complaints.

 

I would like to cite 1st Credit, Reigate whose actions provoked me into complaining to the OFT on the day they(OFT) imposed conditions upon them (19/02/2009). Dodgy tactics too numerous to detail here.

 

I would like to cite Metropolitan Collection Services (MCS) acting for HSBC, who answered a s.77/78 CCA request with an insistance on signed application, and a quotation from the Data Protection Act which 'forbids them divulging data to an unidentifiable entity' (I have been dealing with them since March 2009.

 

I would like to site Apex Credit Management (formerly B C W Group) whose response to a s.77/78 CCA request was to return my letter and PO, and to close my account and pass it back to Barclaycard.

 

I would like to cite Barclays Bank plc, who, when asked in May 2009 why I did not receive any benefit from the PPI included in my loan, found themselves unable to answer my query within 8 weeks and 'hoped I would not find it necessary to complain to the FOS'. I did, and neither have so far given me a final response (Nov 2009).

 

All of these are the subject of threads that I have posted on this forum.

 

I am pleased to participate in this Mass Complaint.

 

LuckyS

Edited by luckysandpiper
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Blair, Oliver & Scott - 5 phone calls a day until I moved, changed home and mobile numbers then wrote a letter telling them to shove it which amazingly they did, but then I hear from:

iQor - bought a debt from Intelligent finance that was in dispute and kept sending letters chasing it despite being advised they had breached regulations.

Mercers now chasing a credit card in dispute - requested signed agreement back in August - nothing since.

Edited by nporter
Link to post
Share on other sites

Blair, Oliver & Scott - 5 phone calls a day until I moved, changed home and mobile numbers then wrote a letter telling them to shove it which amazingly they did, but then I hear from:

iQor - bought a debt from Intelligent finance that was in dispute and kept sending letters chasing it despite being advised they had breached regulations.

 

I think you'll find that the debt has only been passed on. Iqor, or wang -qor, are HBOS' next bottom feeder after hopeless in-house BO&S

 

Don't reply to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Max Recovery c/o Eversheds!!!!

 

They registered seven defaults on my credit report and havent provided any evidence as to why!!!!!! I have contacted them 17 times in writing (recordered delivery) and still nothing. I had never heard of them until i got a copy of my credit report.

 

THEY SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO GET AWAY WITH IT...................

 

OFT & Financial Ombudsman dealing with them now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are fed up of reading the stories about the Dcas who continually flout laws and principles and do not act responsibly.Following all your requests,you are invited to add your user name here together with the dca or firm of baliffs that you wish to complain about.Just add a few lines of your complaint.

Once we have a list we can then get something drafted to launch a bulk complaint to Consumer direct The FSO the others who are required to take up complaints.

 

2SHEP WE HAVE ISSUED A COMPLAINT AGAINST 1ST CREDIT AND CONNAUGHT TO THE OFT REGARDING A SUPPOSEDLY OWED DEBT FROM 1999 WHICH WAS STATUTE BARRED AND THEY ISSUED ME WITH A STAT. DEMAND WHICH WAS THROWN OUT BY THE JUDGE , THEY NEVER EVEN TURNED UP AT COURT AND THEY STILL 1ST. CREDIT ARE STILL SENDING LETTERS THAT IS WHY WE HAVE REPORTED THEM NOW WE HAVE HAD A LETTER BACK FROM THE OFT WHO ARE LOOKING INTO IT.THIS IS ALL THANKS TO MEMBERS ON THIS SITE TELLING US WHAT TO DO.

1ST CREDIT ARE LOWER THAN THE LOW,

CONNAUGHT WHO ARE IN CAHOOTS WITH 1ST CREDIT TELLING ME TO TAKE A LOAN OUT, UNBELIEVABLE THREATS AND HARASSMENT THESE LOW LIFES WILL STOP AT NOTHING AND THERE STAFF CANNOT POSSIBLY HAVE ANY CONSCIENCE THE LIES AND SCHEMING WAYS THEY TREAT VUNERABLE PEOPLE ITS DIABOLICAL.

HOPE YOU CAN PUT THIS ALLTOGETHER MARTIN 3030.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My OH's Barclaycard is in dispute and is with solicitors but Allied International, AIC, have chosen to start sending colourful postcards and using my cellphone to get hold of him! The solicitors have already sent BC a letter about this and how I need to have my cell phone free for our little boy with a life-threatening illness, but they continue to call. They do not veryify identity with me and are the rudest people I have ever spoken to. No more than a bunch of thugs. :mad:

 

Names so far, McDermott, Watson and Soave

0141 2283008

Link to post
Share on other sites

You still have the delightful Mr Gilmour to look forward to. :mad:

 

 

Oh heck, DD, now you're making me want to phone (recorded of course) him in the morning before he phones me:D:D:D

 

Incidentally, they only use MY cellphone number now to try and contact OH, haven't I read somewhere how to record cellphone calls???:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not believe I owe barclays any money . The debt is denied . The agreed the overdraft and then agreed to put in on loan in 2006 , Section 18 of the consumer credit act maintainas theat verbal agreemetns enters into a series of multiple agreement. The data acess report is full of errors and they tried to con me in to changing the product to get an new agreement , as they admit in the report that they would have great difficutly recovering their money if they did not . Tehy messed up my credit rating to keep control of the debt so I could not go elsewhere. I have made a goodwill gesture of of £2000 which has been refused , then looked as if they would agree I acalled the DC and got a load of agression. I have been very ill hence off line. I would like to meet someone at b who speaks sense to thrash this out for the sake of my health.

 

Exit3

Link to post
Share on other sites

The easiest way to get them off your back is probably to use the template letter posted here.

 

It forces them to take notice or be taken to FOS and could result in them having to pay you for distress and inconvenience (FOS reported last month that it has happened).

 

IAMHARRASSED - You should send the template letter to Lloyds TSB AND Apex

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

DCA First credt solutions using automated message ringing service and I received a call at 10.20 p.m. They said this was impossible as they closed at 8 p.m. I do not use my answering machine. They stated that they could not help it if a message was left at 12 p.m. and the service kept ringing. Surely they have control of their calls. I persisted with the statement that they called me at 10.20 at night and they chose to terminate the conversation which must be recorded . I cannot get any sense out of these people. They must use a separate company to do the calling. Tehy also use a sperate comapny at the same address to threaten to call round .CFL not first credit solutions is annoucned in the message . Are they skimming around the rules of the officeof fair trading. I ask to speak to the person who left the message adn I was told that James left the messages and they dealt wit th accounts.

 

When I told them on previous conversation that I had been seriulsy ill. and was still recovering the answer was you are fit enought to work to are fit enought to deal with this. I cannot deal with the agression their client is BArclays and I am hoping to find an alternative solution. I beleive that if they knwe how they were being represented they may lose their contract.

 

exit 3

 

exit 3

Link to post
Share on other sites

Optima Legal

Arndale House

Charles Street

Bradford, BD1 1UN.

Optima Legal - Welcome

 

These swines threated to take my HOME for a Credit Card debt with MBNA. Calling it an inhibition application, saying my home will be sold and MBNA will request the credit card debt paid with equity available following sale of my home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capquest - calling me claiming to be from The Telegram Office with a very important letter for me (1471 told me it was Capquest)

 

Capquest sending me demands even though they have been told that the debt is in dispute with the OC

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Please add Newmans to this, they didn't respond to any of my letters requesting cca or correct follow up letters. They even turned up on my doorstep despite a letter revoking the right all of which were sent recorded delivery. Constant phone calls to my wife who told them time and time again that I would not be in during the day as working. All this while she was also adjusting to life with a newborn! Awful awful people. No respect for the law whatsoever. The debt was through Tesco's who have since sent the debt to Moorcroft despite the final letter ( from this site) informing my details to be removed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please add Rundle to the list, they harassed me as a vulnerable person and unlawfully charge me 5 times for each visit and charged levy fees when they had not levied and misrepresented their powers saying they were coming to remove my goods, without a walking possession. Info given in two separate letters from them gave different dates for certification of bailiff. Also, called at my business address (guest house, all goods tools of trade) to remove goods!

 

I am too stressed out to take them to Court, I am busy fighting a committal to prison for non-payment of the council tax to deal with the bailiff!! Therefore, whatever progress is made with this mass complaint would be a benefit!

 

Thank you to the originator/s of this idea!

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...