Jump to content


hells bells


hels bells
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I realise this but why are they making it difficult, this is no way a specialised claim!... is it?

Im just frustrated for her as all are, I guess, poor gal doesnt seem to be able to move forward to the next stage.

 

lets all storm the court and beat up mr barclays...[b4 any baseball bats come out of the cupboards,, i was joking!]

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I realise this but why are they making it difficult, this is no way a specialised claim!... is it? Its because there are potentially billions of pounds at stake if they, barclays that is, get it wrong.

 

 

Im just frustrated for her as all are, I guess, poor gal doesnt seem to be able to move forward to the next stage.

 

lets all storm the court and beat up mr barclays...[b4 any baseball bats come out of the cupboards,, i was joking!]

 

JMHO

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

No judgement by default, this i guess means if they don,t show the judge cannot lean my way, so the outcome has to go one way or the other, as in, they could present documentation to argue the contray to my evidence, they are quitely confident i feel.

 

hels

Link to post
Share on other sites

however, i will argue the toss and do the best i can with a thier solicitor, stay with me peeps ! the end is nigh.

 

Hang in there girl.

 

Judges know the importance of fairness.

 

You have done everything you can to obtain the information, you have the evidence. The judge may not be able to directly give you a default judgement, but he can issue some pretty damning Orders too.

 

Lean heavily on the justice of your case, be polite and factual, do not be abusive to B and clearly explain your case in your own words. Do not try to be clever - that is the judge's job.

 

One final piece of advice - when dealing with the judge remember - he/she is just another human being trying daily to untangle intracate law. But he is just another person, so treat him that way and you will not get nervous - he will help you as best he can.

 

Be the sincere positive person we know you are - you do not need luck!

 

Z

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to all trying to talk to me in the chat room, i,m at work and i cannot get my keyboard to type on the page, sorry peeps, if anyone reads this can you let everyone know i was not ignoring them please :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

To the people who have given up their time and made tons of effort to support me with claim........ i cannot raise you high enough, i put you all on pedestals to look at you forever.

 

Until tomorrow guys and girls.......... i feel good, file is prepared, much evidence for any big barrister from Barcalys to chew on and who knows we could all be out tomorow night painting the town any colour you like, perhaps having won quite a victory for the business peeps.:D;):cool:

 

heres hoping

Link to post
Share on other sites

To the people who have given up their time and made tons of effort to support me with claim........ i cannot raise you high enough, i put you all on pedestals to look at you forever.

 

Until tomorrow guys and girls.......... i feel good, file is prepared, much evidence for any big barrister from Barcalys to chew on and who knows we could all be out tomorow night painting the town any colour you like, perhaps having won quite a victory for the business peeps.:D;):cool:

 

heres hoping

 

that's my girl...

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck helen. sock it to them. :D

 

Hels

 

Don't forget you are sharing the day with a very high profile case.

Havent got the link, but the barrister who is making Barclays go to High Court to defend their penalty charges - despite Barclays offering him £4,000 - more than twice his penalties to settle out of court. Got that wrong I think - its NatWest?

 

Z

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hels

 

Don't forget you are sharing the day with a very high profile case.

Havent got the link, but the barrister who is making Barclays go to High Court to defend their penalty charges - despite Barclays offering him £4,000 - more than twice his penalties to settle out of court. Got that wrong I think - its NatWest?

 

Z

 

its in county court not high court. and yes its natwest not barclays :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

just to let you know. I LOST,and and was charged with all cost, and the barrister came all the way from London... and heres why,

1. My court letter said a 'Hearing' today. On arrvial into the room and trying to present my W/S i was told by the judge today was a direction, [not what my letter says]. She procedeed to ask the barrister what he wanted to do, he quote from the letters sent to me by barclays, They simply dod not have my data' the judge agreed, i tried very hard to present my evidence which i know contadicted wha tthe letters said but she[ judge] would not hear of it, she said it was clear by thier letter they did not have it so therefore cannot supply it , listed and written conversation between the banks and myself were presented to the judge arguing that my data had been ordred twice, the banks quoted a retention policy in thier letter, which i had asked for and i agaibn asked the judge to request, the barrister simpy said they did not have such a policy to show me, double dutch or what. i sited Companies Act, 'Duty to keep accounting records, but she did not see how this effected me, i showed her letters [from Barclays to other CAG] which clearly evidenced data was stored for 12 yrs, she poo pooed them and said they did not concern my case, i ask how if the Inland Revenue wanted to look at the banks info, how could they evidence there charges without a breakdown of what they have charged me for, she again said this was not involved with my case.

 

The judge gave the very young and pin stripped Barrister all he asked for included all the costs, she did not once put to him any evidence presented by and for me, i am totally gutted that she was so biased towards them and made me feel i was not adequate in any legal procedure/ training to represent myself. She found me annoy and argumentative if i tried to present any arguement or evidence, i,ts not so much i lost.... more how the procedure was conducted, how dismissive the judge was and how i knwe from the outset she was not interested in my case at all, she asked why i wanted the data, [ this had been written on my claim many times] she totally believed barclays end off.....

 

sorry guys:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for a little Hijack....... Zootscoot, do you have evidence that Abbey keep records of accounts and the details therein going back to 1925?

srfrench :eek:

 

Fight incompetance, stupidity, greed and unfairness......There's no excuse and no place for it in society, unless they really are! :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

I am sorry to read this, your not the first person who has been biased by a court (and I'm not on about bank charges), the great injustice of our system it stinks, always has done and I think always will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you have evidence that Abbey keep records of accounts and the details therein going back to 1925?

 

How long do banks have to keep details for? | Ask the experts | Guardian Unlimited Money

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol. I have a court date at skipton for wednesday the 19th of april. How do you know who is doing the case.

 

Like I posted earler I spoke to somebody called Tom and he had all the figures and said a letter was getting sent out to me and that was wednesdy this week but still nothing in the post this morening. Sorry for asking on this thread but would you be worried now or not???

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...