Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

About to begin court proceedings.


peonyqueen
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6314 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi! I'm not very good at this- bit of a techno phobe but my fear of actually taking Abbey to court has helped me to overcome the computer fear!:o

I am claiming £3969.85 from Abbey and have today received a letter from them offering me a big fat "goodwill gesture" of £775.00!

Firstly I am a bit concerned as I get confused as to the procedure and sent the spreadsheet including interest with my first letter. Does anybody know if this matters greatly?

Secondly, any idea as to how long it takes for a date to come through for the hearing if they are stubborn enough to let it go that far? I don't want to rush it obviously but at the same time I could really do with that money to fund my studies so that I am no longer in a position where I might go over my overdraft limit!!

And finally, I could really do with a buddy but I had a bit of a problem when I tried to get one (told you I was no good with this computer lark!) so if anybody out there would be prepared to hold my hand through this I would really appreciate it! :?

Thanks,

Peony Queen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi peony Queen,

 

Well done for overcoming your fears and welcome to the forum, there are plenty of people to hold your hand. Obviosly have a good read of the library and FAQ's. I would write back and accept the £775 as partial settlement of your claim, include another schedule of charges adjusted to take account of the £775 and reitterate request for full repayment of charges. The interest you refer to, is this interest due to the charges or the 8% you can claim when you take court action.

As to hearing dates, I would allow at least 3 months from when you start your claim. Some can be longer than others, started mine in June, still no closer to the hearing date. All I can say is that abbey will drag it out as long as possible, and probably all the way to the court date. On the up side this gives you time to prepare. You can find all the relevant info in the library section, have a good read, and the best of luck.

 

Regards bish.

Abbey : £8070.41*PAID IN FULL*14/02/07:D

Capital one : LBA sent 17/09/06 £1,087.22

Marbles : LBA sent 17/09/06 £720.00 ; £720 offer accepted:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks bish, I'll take your advice and send an amended schedule of charges. So do I carry on putting the interest on as my spreadsheet automatically calculates the interest for you so every time I go into it, the amount has increased. Shall I send this or copy and paste the original amount for now, minus the £775?

I am truly grateful for this by the way, I don't feel so alone now- I put this off for about a year as I was too afraid to take them on single-handed! Thanks! :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personnally i wouldnt amend the schedule, the GOGW is just that, when they settle you can subtract the money they have paid from the balance due at that time.

 

If its a refund of charges then they need to tell you which ones so you can adjust your schedule properly.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You could do as Glen suggests, however abbey could only argue that they were the most recent charges that have been refunded. I received my GOGW after issuing my claim in court, I then wrote to the court and informed them that I had accepted the money as partial settlement. It is up to you realy, you have not gone to court yet so it may be better to ammend your schedule now so that it is correct ready for issuing court action.

If the interest you refer to is increasing daily this is the section 69 8% interest that you claim once you issue court proceedings. You do not send this amount in your initial aproach to abbey for repayment of charges, so amending the schedule now may be the best approach. I am not sure what spreadsheet you are using, but for now you only need to send the charges less the GOGW if you want to deduct it. If you put the date you received it and enter it as -750.00 the spreadsheet should deduct it and alter the interest.

The only interest you can put at the prelim stage is interest that was a direct result of the charges. This interest is shown on your original statements and relates to the interest you pay for being in overdraft or for exceeding the overdraft etc. A certain amount of that interest is due to the charges, so you can claim it back.

I think every one feels as you do and have about taking court action. Just stick with it, its a hard slogg but worth it. HTH.

 

Regards bish.

Abbey : £8070.41*PAID IN FULL*14/02/07:D

Capital one : LBA sent 17/09/06 £1,087.22

Marbles : LBA sent 17/09/06 £720.00 ; £720 offer accepted:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You could do as Glen suggests, however abbey could only argue that they were the most recent charges that have been refunded.

 

Bish

 

im curious to understand what makes you say that about the charges that a gogw could/should be applied to?

 

I know many have said similar things, but if i was the defendant i would argue they should have been applied to the oldest charges for obvious reasons especially where contractual interest is being claimed.

 

For this reason I have been coming to the conlcusion that unless the defendant specifies that the money is for a refund of charges then it is a matter for the courts to decide what its status is, if it gets that far.

 

As an aside, if they sent a gesture of goodwill consisting of something of a non monetary form, say a bunch of flowers, how would you deal with that? I dont suppose for one minute that anyone would amend their cliam, not becuase the flowers didnt have a value but because they would recieve it as a gesture.

 

Just because its moeny i dont believe its status is any different, its 'like a bottle of scotch given to you at xmas'.

 

JMHO

 

GLenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Glenn

 

The reason I say this is because I noticed on my statement that it said refund of charge or along those lines not GOGW as it said in the letter. Also I received mine after taking court action, so claiming interest and 8% s69 interest on charges. They could well argue that these were earlier charges, but would then have to refund you the interest incured due to those charges. You are correct in what you say, I was just trying to avoid any pitfalls further down the line. They have previously made settlement offers then deducted the GOGW from the 50% or 75% offer. Assuming they are the most recent charges does not loose you to much 8% interest on the interest. I did not deduct the GOGW from my claim as it came after I had filed the N1, I just informed the court, as you should if you receive any payments. My schedule for the court bundle will show it though. I don't think it really matters when you do it, just that any settlement is going to include the GOGW.

It would be perhaps an argument to get it in court, if you refuse to deduct the GOGW from your claim and take your stance Glenn, not sure I have the bottle for that though.

 

Regards bish.

Abbey : £8070.41*PAID IN FULL*14/02/07:D

Capital one : LBA sent 17/09/06 £1,087.22

Marbles : LBA sent 17/09/06 £720.00 ; £720 offer accepted:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...