Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6152 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi Ive been reading through all of the material on the site and i think ive been a bit confused with what i have sent to the YB. I originally sent a letter asking for a list of charges and they sent me all of my statements. I then calculated the charges and sent a letter asking for my charges back( i didnt send a copy of a schedule of charges ) i also asked for the charges only not the interest. i was under the impression i was meant to send a copy of the schedule of charges and the interest with my next letter but now im not so sure and im worried i have messed up the whole process PLEASE HELP !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okies dont worry too much about it. If your first letter gave them 14 days to respond before you send them a final letter Send them the LBA with a schedule of charges.

 

If in doubt you can start from the beginning, it will only put you behind 14 days.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I started out we just asked for the amount and spreadsheets didn't get submitted until the court claim went in, so you will be fine.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

:-? Hi all

 

I will give you the background first before asking the question. I sent a letter last yr to my local branch asking for all of my charges back without interest or SOC they forwarded it to Scotland and i had a response from scotland saying the charges stand and if i claim through court they will counterclaim. So I sent a further letter asking for charges but this time asking for interest and including an SOC, this letter i sent to scotland. I then received a letter before xmas asking for 4wks so they can investigate my claim further. I have just recieved a letter from scotland with a chq and offer of £1791.50 my charges total £4828.96 with interest the charges alone total £3773.00. I feel that as they have made an offer they are worried they will loose if it should go to court I am therefore taking the claim to the next stage my question is: since i have been corresponding with scotland will it come under their law even though my original ltr went to my branch and if so can i rectify this by sending copies of all correspondence (i made to scotland) to my local branch. Also I do want to continue my claim so which ltr do i send next. do i complete an n1 form now or do i write to the bank to advise that i do not accept their offer as full and final and advise them that they will b receiving a court date? please can someone help thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you dont want to accept the offer you should return the cheque declining the offer, there is a template letter in the library.When you file at MCOL just make sure that you file against an address in England,either your local branch or the head office in Leeds.Doesnt really matter which,they will pass it on to Scotland.You can then safely correspond with Glasgow.

;) If this helps please click the scales bottom left
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have sent the chq back and advised that i will taking court action and Scotland wrote back to me to advise they can no longer deal with my complaint and that it will be dealt with by the legal dept, which is fine but they sent me the chq back do i send it back to them or hang on to it until everything has been dealt with through court and if i keep the chq do i claim the remaining amount through court? please can someone help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the cheque back to the legal dept with another letter saying you decline their offer...

Then continue to MCOL stage using local branch or head office in Leeds...

 

Started 25th Sep 2006 - got cheque on 4th December 2006. Settled without interest but full amount plus court costs :)

A & L Watch out buddy you are next 2007!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all

 

I sent my N1 form to the court using the YB leeds address and sent the chq back to YB with another decline of offer letter. Included with the N1 form i sent 3 copies of forms and schedule so im just waiting now for a date in court assuming that the YB dont offer me full amount before that. Im quite nervous and alittle excited about going to court if it goes that far. I will keep you all posted with my progress.

 

Once i receive a court date and court case reference do i need to inform anyone on this site ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

oh no i think ive totally messed things up. the courts have sent back my N1 form and have sent a letter saying the following:

 

Your papers have been returned as the intereset being claimed in the particulars of claim cannot state as the court deems just as your claim is for a specific amount of money, therefore you need to provide a daily rate of interest for each charge.

 

I have enclosed leaflet EX302 to assist you. Your court fee will be retained for 10days. please return amended forms within 7 days.

 

Im confused as i used the SOC excel spreadsheet on line to calculate the interest. also the period i am claiming for is 7.9.00 to 6.9.2006which is a full 6 yrs of charges my last charge was on 20.7.06 do i continue the interest up until i am in court, and if so this will take me over £5000 does this mean i will not be able go through the small claims court.

 

im so confused please someone help me!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you put in the value box on the front?

 

Value:

Bank charges (and overdraft interest if claimed) - £XXXX

Data Protection Act Fee - £XX (if claimed)

S69 8% Interest - £XXX

Total of - £XXXX

Plus daily interest at 8% of £0.XXp from the date of issue until settlement.

 

 

And in your POC's under 'Accordingly the Claimant claims:

c) Interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% as set out on the attached list of charges - £xxx [enter interest total at date of claim] continuing at 8% until judgement or settlement at a daily rate of £0.xx.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all i have received a notice that acknowledgement of service has been filed, it was filed by YB on 23.03.07. It says the defendant has 28 days to respond and they are indicating an intention to defend all of the claim. Im very nervous now. I have printed all of the on line court bundle that is accessable on this site but having read through it it all seems a little confusing do i need all of it or do i just take out the parts that apply to me. also is there anything else i will need to add to it. Also i would like to know is it normal for the bank to defend the claim as im a little worried.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Purple Silk,

 

It all very normal. The next thing you need to do is to await the defence and you will then get the allocation questionnaire. Start reading up on how to fill this in. There is guidance in the bank templates library. Pay particular regard to the Draft Order for directions. Post on here when you receive it and we can help you fill it in.

 

You won't need the bundle for a good few weeks yet but it is better to be organised than not.

 

Best of luck

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your response i appreciate all of the help ive received from this site its been a long haul but ive got every intention to see this through to the very end and i will keep you posted on every event as and when it occurrs again thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi all I wonder if anyone can help me,

 

The claim im making is for the last six years and i dont bank with them anymore ive already moved my business to another bank but there is still an overdraft on the account. I thought that last year all the direct debits had been cancelled on the YB account as i had gone in to the branch personally and asked them to do so, they confirmed they had done this however in december a direct debit went through for £10 which took me over the overdraft limit and i started getting charges all over again as you can imagine i was furious i think in total it came to around £150.00.

 

My question is can i start another claim for these recent charges or am i best waiting until my current claim is completed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have just received a defence from YB which really just reiterates the original letter i received from them stating i was fully aware of the charges via post and that i signed an agreement and was informed of terms and conditions when i opened the account with them. it also states the bank deny that the charges are inproportionate and are a genuine pre estimate of cost of cost resulting from my failure to keep in terms and conditions. they also state that charges are not compensation but a fee for the service provided by them in extending facilities to me. they say the charges where fair cost of maintaining admin systems, the risk of loss to the bank and cost of recovery systems.

 

so now what happens ?

 

do i wait ?

 

please can someone let me know

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It might be worth giving the court a quick call Claire just to put your mind at rest. They should be able to tell you roughly when you should recieve your AQ forms.

 

Sarah.

Yorkshire Bank

Started Process 19th Sept 2006.

All Stages Followed.

Next Step Court!

Hearing Date 7th June 2007.

WON!!!!! 6th June 2007 :D

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Example Step-By-Step Instructions

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...