Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Some quick help


meggyweggy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6310 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I sent a CCA request to a DCA that states it owns a debt i am suposed to have with them. Instead of providing me with a CCA for the account they have sent a letter stating many thanks for the £1 payment on the accoutn. I am in the process of writing a kind reply telling them that it was a CCA request and that they have x amount of days to comply. Can someone please tell where were it gives the 12 day limit and also what action i take if they dont comply.

 

Many Thanks

 

Meggy

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do not comply within the 12 day limit, then the debt is unenforceable without going to court. I am sure they are well aware that it is a CCA request... but if it makes you feel better, you could write to them again (Recorded Delivery) detailing that fact and that they now gave xx number of days within which to comply, as you have said.

 

If they still have not fulfilled your request one calendar month after the 12 day default, then they will have also committed a criminal offence on top of that default.... therefore, I would wait until then before writing to them again. :)

 

Come back on here nearer the time for further advice... one step at a time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just finished writing a letter, to the company with a big smile stating that they only have 6 days legft to comply including the date of the letter, and that i still don't acknolodge the debt.

 

Should be fun to see what they say, that goes recorded in the morning

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Meggy,

 

There is no need whatsoever to write a kind letter or any other sort, informing them that the £1.00 was for your CCA request. They can read (one assumes) to ascertain what the pmt was for. Why put yourself to any inconvenience, but more importantly why give them the dates within which they have to comply? They are supposed to be fully conversant with the CCA 1974, so why give them the deadline expiry dates? It just makes things easier for them!

 

Ideally, you don't want them to comply with the 12 working day and one month deadline. You are trying to build an argument against them, the last thing you want to do is give away your plan of attack!

 

Mark your calender, allowing two days for delivery(unless you sent the CCA request by guaranteed next day delivery). Sit back, relax and wait. That's all you have to do at this stage.

 

Resist any temptation to speak to them over the telephone, simply say you do not discuss such matters over the phone and hang up. If they write to you, keep the letters but do not repsond to them. They should not be contacting you whilst the account is disputed, it amounts to harassment. As you are waiting for them to screw up, it is best not to have any contact with them, as it's so easy to start talking about the CCA request and before you know it, you'll be discussing deadlines etc....

 

I hope this is helpful.

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Meggy,

 

I have just read your 2nd post and I wish to re-iterate that it is a big mistake to start warning them how long they have left to comply with your request. It serves only one purpose, which is to forewarn them, it certainly does you no favours! Leave the situation alone until the 12 working days and one month have expired.

 

Laiste.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PriorityOne,

 

I'm afraid I disagree. If a CCA request has been properly drafted, it is abundantly clear that the pmt is to cover the cost of making the request. There is no need to clarify anything, if the DCA's are too stupid to recognise what the pmt is for that's their problem! In my experience, DCA's use this tactic to encourage people to get in touch with them, to discuss the account and payment of it.

 

There are two possible outcomes with this type of request. One, they furnish the agreement and it may or may not prove to be lawful, depending upon whether it conforms to the requirements of the CCA 1974. Two, they don't furnish the agreement in time, in which case, an offence has been committed, which adds to your claim against them. If they can't produce it, it's game over. If they can, the debt is still enforceable, just not for the period from the CCA request until compliance.

 

None of these scenarios require any sort of intervention, i.e. sending letters before timescale is up. I have been through this process with 7+ credit cards, and it is best left alone until the compliance period expires, pure and simple!

 

Laiste.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PriorityOne,

 

I'm afraid I disagree. If a CCA request has been properly drafted, it is abundantly clear that the pmt is to cover the cost of making the request. There is no need to clarify anything, if the DCA's are too stupid to recognise what the pmt is for that's their problem! In my experience, DCA's use this tactic to encourage people to get in touch with them, to discuss the account and payment of it.

 

There are two possible outcomes with this type of request. One, they furnish the agreement and it may or may not prove to be lawful, depending upon whether it conforms to the requirements of the CCA 1974. Two, they don't furnish the agreement in time, in which case, an offence has been committed, which adds to your claim against them. If they can't produce it, it's game over. If they can, the debt is still enforceable, just not for the period from the CCA request until compliance.

 

None of these scenarios require any sort of intervention, i.e. sending letters before timescale is up. I have been through this process with 7+ credit cards, and it is best left alone until the compliance period expires, pure and simple!

 

Laiste.

 

Hi Laiste :) ,

 

I think we may have to agree to disagree here. Whilst there may be no need to contact a DCA in order to establish that the £1 for a CCA request should not be used against the debt itself, it all depends on how strong a person is feeling at the time when dealing with these people. From my own point of view, I would rather send another recorded delivery letter to establish that the £1 was for a CCA request, than live in fear of them turning up on my doorstep within the time frame before they default. Once the time frame is up however, then they can do what they like.

 

The logic of this is that, should they decide to become stroppy, try to wriggle out of it and/or lie after the time frame, the CCA request would have been backed up by further clarification by recorded delivery, which would strengthen my case against them anyway.

 

If they don't have the CCA, then they don't have it. If they don't have it, then it can't be pulled from the air by magic... therefore by reminding them that they have xx amount of time to comply would put the ball back in my court by reminding them of their legal obligations.

 

You sound a much stronger person than me with these people... hope you can understand where I am coming from.... I just like to cover my bases. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PriorityOne,

 

I understand the point you are making and your reasoning behind it. What I would say from my experience of dealing with DCA's too numerous to mention is this. I have never had a DCA turn up on my doorstep in the past 12mnths. I have had the letters and cards from them saying they are visiting on a specific date etc... They have never turned up and neither have I contacted them about the impending visit.

 

I think it is all based on cost. Its too expensive for them to send anyone, which is why all the threats turn out to be hollow! Additionally, consider what your options are if they did turn up. If they knocked on your door and stated where they were from, at that point you would instruct them to leave immediately. Tell them they have not been invited onto your property and as such are trespassing. Tell them to leave, otherwise you will call the police. If they don't leave call the police, by the way such conduct I believe would also be a breach of the Protection From Harassment Act 1997. I would not concern myself with a situation that is in all liklihood not going to materialise and even if it did, the law is there to protect you.

 

I do not see myself as being braver or stronger than the next person, I just refuse to be cowed by these parasites or dance to their tune. My argument is simply that you have done all you need to in sending the CCA request. Following things up with further letters in my opinion, defeats the object. You want them to screw up, that's one of the most important reasons for sending the CCA! Don't alert them to when their time runs out, we are supposed to be making things difficult for them, not easier! I have 10 credit cards, I've sent 10 CCA requests. They have all defaulted and committed criminal offences. I could put it down to just ineptitude, however I am inclined to think that not sending reminders helped! Something to think about.......

 

Best Wishes,

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am currently waiting for 2 of mine to default... come home each day expecting to find some excuse or another, but have to admit to finding it difficult to relax until those 12 days are up.... both were received on the 4th... I don't think I could have taken on as many as you have all at once :o ... my intention was to take them on one at a time, but had a 'phone call from another, which made me angry enough to act on it.

 

Good luck with all of yours... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...