Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Toby versus LloydsTSB


tobyspencer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

 

I've decided to start my own thread for my case against Lloyds. At the moment I don't even know how much I owed, but to be honest I don't think it will be more than a few hundred.

 

I sent my Data Protection Act letter to Lloyds requesting a list of charges back in December, but they haven't received it yet. Royal Mail say I have to give them 15 working days to deliver a letter sent 1st class recorded, but I think if it hasn't arrived by now (it was sent on the 22nd) it's never going to.

 

I sent the first letter to the Gresham Street address I found on this site, but I'm not sure if it's the right one. Now that I have a second chance, can anyone recommend a better address?

 

Regards

 

Toby

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

You could try sending it to:

 

Senior Manager

Data Protection Dept.

Lloyds TSB Bank PLC

The Pentagon

48 Chiswell Street

London

EC1Y 4XX

 

Although I do know people who have successfully sent their SAR to the address you've mentioned above. You can also hand it in to your local branch and get them to sign for it - I think.

 

Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Toby.

 

The Data Protection Register gives......

 

LLOYDS TSB BANK PLC

25 GRESHAM STREET

LONDON

EC2V 7HN.

Did you remember to enclose the £10 fee. Have they cashed it?

Remember that they have 40 days to comply.

Regards, Rooster.

 

 

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi guys

 

Just an update for you. At the begining of January I sent a letter to Lloyds requesting a list of charges relating to two accounts I have with them - a current account and a credit card account. I didn't actually say 'I would like a list of charges relating to my current account and credit card account' I just listed the sort code and account number for my current account and my credit card number underneath that and asked 'for a list of charges relating to the above accounts'. To me that seemed obvious that they were two seperate accounts as the sort code and current account number have no relevance to my credit card.

 

I have now received a set of statements for my credit card, but not my current account. Should I wait to see if my statements for my current account arrive, or should I write to them explaining that my original request was for TWO seperate accounts, just in case my letter wasn't clear on that?

 

Regards

 

Toby

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Well it's been a while since I last posted, but until now it's all been fairly textbook. I had the usual replies from Lloyds about how their charges are fair and that it's no use arguing blah, blah, blah and have filed my claim with MCOL. SC&M acknowledged the claim with a couple of days to spare giving them an extra 14 days, but that ran out on the 16th and they have not yet filed a defence.

 

What should I do? I read in another thread that I should write to them to give them another 7 days, but by the time they receive the letter they'll have had 6 or 7 extra days already. Is it still better to write to them before applying for a judgement by default, just as a sign that I've been considerate and more than a little generous?

 

Also, if in my letter I should ask one last time for payment, presumably I should ask for the pre-8% amount (plus MCOL fee) as the 8% is only added if it goes to court. Is that right?

 

I welcome any comments.

 

Toby

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go on to MCOL and request judgement. Didn't you put the 8% interest on when you filed on MCOL? If not, you should have done. as this is the court stage (MCOL is, if you like, an on-line court).

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I added the 8% when I filed, but if I were to write to Lloyds (or SC&M) giving them a chance to settle before going to court, can I still claim the 8% interest?

 

Regarding applying for a judgement by default, as I understand it, I don't 'win' my case, rather Lloyds will apply for a set aside which could cause even more delay. Isn't it better to have something in writing showing that I gave SC&M enough opportunity to enter a defence before applying for a judgement? In fact, isn't it better to not apply for a judgement by default at all? Has anyone actually ever got their money back this way?

 

I shouldn't be surprised if this is just another delay tactic - don't submit a defence, wait for a judgement by default, then apply for a set aside and score themselves another few weeks delay.

 

Thanks for your comment Dave. I'm really tempted to just apply for a judgement, but I'm concerned that it won't accomplish anything in my favour. I'm a little confused about what will happen next. Has anyone else faced this situation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes i got judgement in default a couple of weeks ago. The reason you write giving a further 7 days is so that you can show the court you have made an effort to get them to defend your claim. If they apply for a stay or set aside you are more likely to succeed when you objest to the set aside. If they don't reply within your timescale you request judgement. If you haven't seen it already this will help http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/25457-guide-reclaiming-bank-charges.html?garpg=13

Barclays - 2 Accounts - WON

Capital 1 - WON with CI

LTSB - WON

LTSB pre 6 years - N1 for non compliance filed

Barclays pre 6 years - Prelim sent

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the above; but it is an interesting comment you make about the delay tactics. I don't think you can make anything happen any faster whichever decision you make.

But yes, get the 8% as well. Anything else shows weakness to them and they push it even further.

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hi all

 

Just a quick update. I received a letter today from SC&M advising me that Lloyds are giving up and paying me the full amount. I have to sign and send back their letter agreeing to their terms and then it's just a matter of time.

 

Thanks to everyone for their help. When the money is in my account I'll be sure to make a donation.

 

Toby

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, I've signed their letter and faxed it back to them. Can I assume that that's enough and that I'll eventually get my money back or should I post a copy of the letter to them as well?

 

I received a letter from the court yesterday giving instructions for what to do next; obviously they don't yet know that Lloyds have settled. I understand that it is my responsibility to notify them and that I can use the 'Notice of Discontinuance' template letter to do this, but obviously I won't do this until I have the money in my account.

 

However, one of the instructions in the letter reads 'The Defendant shall not later than 4pm on 16th July 2007 serve on the Claimant and lodge at Court a document answering the following questions: (a) Is the case intended to be contested to and at trial? (b) Does the Defendant intend to apply to adduce expert evidence?' Will Lloyds simply have to tell the courts that they don't intend to contest?

 

Sorry if this is a daft question but I'd just to know if there's anything else I should be doing.

 

Regards

 

Toby

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...