Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Chrisi v Lloyds TSB


Chrisi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6233 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Initial enquire sent on 2nd April about two accounts which were closed back in 2002, one having accumulated numerous charges. They replied saying that the accounts were opened in 1999 and that there were more than 60 statement covering the entire period when the accounts were active. Also said it would involve a lot of work to produce all that information and that they needed either £5 per statement or a total of £10. On 6th April sent them formal DPA letter and a tenner requesting copies of all statements. No reply yet, but no doubt all that work pushing a few buttons will take a while.

If only I'd known then what I know now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum.

 

I'd get a confirmation of receipt of the DPDR from Lloyds. Remind them that the clock is ticking and how long they have got left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Will be ready to start chasing this one soon I hope, once I get Capital One out of the way.

 

Got a letter from them in May saying that as the current address is not the same as the one where the account was registered, they could not send the information, but I would have to collect it from a local branch. Sent back the form nominating my local branch and including a contact telephone number for notification when the papers were ready for collection. I remember getting a phone call to let me know that they were ready for collection, but with one thing and another and ill health, the Lloyds paperwork got put on the back burner for a while.

 

Called into my local branch today and asked for my documents. Guess what? They heaven't got them, don't know if they every arrived, and have no idea where they might be. Went home and called the Copy Statement Dept. A very helpful lady found my file instantly and cofirmed that there was a note there saying that the papers had indeed gone to my local branch via internal mail. Good old post office not to blame this time!! She called my branch to make sure they really hadn't got them and assured me that they would be redone, sent out again, and hopefully I would recieve them within a week.

If only I'd known then what I know now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

On 10th November I wrote to Lloyds, London address with prelim letter. Got reply dated 1st Dec. from Lloyds Customer Service Recovery Centre in Andover, refusing any refund and referring me to the Financial Ombudsman. On 8th Dec I sent LBA and got letter back dated 20th Dec. making a final offer of approx. half of what I am claiming.

 

With Christmas and New Year all got put on the back burner for a while. Just after New Year I drafted a letter back saying that I would be pleased to accept the payment as a interim payment but would have to persue through the courts for the balance if necessary. This letter didn't get posted. Today another letter arrived from Lloyds, Andover, enclosing cheque for the amout they had offered. I have now re-drafted my letter saying thankyou for the interim payment, but I as they had stated it was their final offer, I am not able to accept it as a full settlement, but persuing through the courts for the balance.

 

The claim is for charges dating back to 1999. No mention was made of it being outside the time limit. All this came from the Andover address.

 

I thought Lloyds had a reputation for being a bit tougher than some of the other banks. Are they begining to see sense, or have I just been lucky with this one so far?

 

I'm now working on issuing the summoms. I'm assuming it will have to go to the registered office in London. Is this correct, or has anyone sent their summons to a different address?

If only I'd known then what I know now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chrisi

 

Great result, It is strange that you seem to have slipped through the "six year rule" what was the approx value of your claim i.e. less than £500? more than £2,500? more than £5,000? if it was the smaller value this may be the reason for their capitulation (pun intended;) ) but if it was a much larger amount then I don't have an answer. -maybe some of the more experienced members could chip in with a view?

LSTB (business) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) received 10th Dec prelim + Contractual interest claim sent 10th Jan07 £5k + change

Received partial reduction mount of £5,563 against loan & overdraft of £18k i.e. 30% reduction. Next step PPI's & managed loans. Jan 07

 

LSTB (Girlfriend) prelim sent 10th Jan07 1st account £670

Received partial refund into account of £457 9th Feb, sent rejection letter. donated 5% 10th Feb

LSTB (Girlfriend) prelim sent 10th Jan 07 £1,450

HSBC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 27th DEC (approx £3000)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original claim was for just under £1,500. It will now be for £670ish plus interest now - and court costs. They really should have settled in full - it would have been so much cheaper for them.

If only I'd known then what I know now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

This one is underway now. Finally got all the papers , but still had to put it on the back burner for a while. Anyway, finally got round to issuing prelim letter, then LBA letter - got the £750 goodwill gesture and wrote back saying thank you for the interim payment, but would see them in court as their last letter had said it was their final response.

 

Court papers filed in Staines and deemed to be served on the 17th January. Very rapid response from Lloyds acknowledging service on the 22nd., and on the 24th they filed a defence, notice of which I recieved on the 25th with allocation questionaire. I've got until the 12th Februiary to get it back to the court.

 

Time to start trawling through this site for inspiration and information.

 

Haven't got around to looking at the court bundle yet, but from what I have read there is quite a bit of paper to deal with. SC&M filed their defence by fax. Can I send stuff to them by fax saving time and postage. Their fax number is on the top of the pages sent to the court. Any one any throughts on this?

If only I'd known then what I know now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to help with completing the AQ:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionaires-8.html#post481560

The new strategy should help speed things up.

 

Save the AQ, usually the only document you have to send to SCM is the bundle, which due to its size it would be inappropriate to fax.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fellow Lloyds bashers,

I've just about got my head around the AQ and got it filled in. New Draft Directions attached. BUT think I've made an error in my original list of charges. Can I amend it now or is it too late? Or do I let it go through now and if it's spotted, agree to an amendment at a later date? On the other hand it would do me a favour to correct now as the claim is for just over £1500 and with the correction it brings it down to below the level for having to pay the extra £100 for the AQ

 

I intend to take the AQ to my local court on Monday 5th Feb so has anyone got any thoughts on this?

Chrisi

If only I'd known then what I know now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fellow Lloyds bashers,

I've just about got my head around the AQ and got it filled in. New Draft Directions attached. BUT think I've made an error in my original list of charges. Can I amend it now or is it too late? Or do I let it go through now and if it's spotted, agree to an amendment at a later date? On the other hand it would do me a favour to correct now as the claim is for just over £1500 and with the correction it brings it down to below the level for having to pay the extra £100 for the AQ

 

I intend to take the AQ to my local court on Monday 5th Feb so has anyone got any thoughts on this?

Chrisi

 

 

An amendment now will cost you £35 which you can not reclaim. If you wish to amend the claim you will need to complete an N244 and submit it to the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks livelylad,

I had read that somewhere, but it had completely slipped my mind. Think I'll leave it for now. Lloyds didn't pick up on it when they received my copy of charges with the summons, but no doubt they might do later. They didn't query that the accounts went back to 1999 either - just sent their standard defence that they are right, etc. etc , not unlawful - service charges, not penalty, etc. Probably wishful thinking, but maybe they will continue to give little attention to detail and just pay up.

Chrisi

If only I'd known then what I know now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chrisi - I too would leave it, if you file an amendment you are likely to be delayed by a while. Lloyds are generally issuing offers around AQ time now anyway, see what that brings (if anything) and then review your decision.

 

They picked up within my offer that I claimed back over 6 years, have a look at my thread as I am just in front of you. I have seen SCM make offers that include the AQ fee when it has not even been paid.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chrisi.......2 threads merged.:D

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Martin for sticking these two threads together.

 

Well the AQ is now all filled in and ready to go. As SC&M can fax their docs to the Court, I see no reason why I cannot fax docs to them. The fax machine I use spits out a confirmation that all has arrived safely. It is still within plenty of time to ge one in the post as well if they say this is a no-no for some reason. This is the covering letter I attached in front of the five pages I sent i.e. 4 pages of AQ and a copy of the Draft Directoins. I also wrote their reference number at the top of each sheet.

 

If any one wants to use it, feel free.

 

(6 Pages)

Faxed to: 01273 745356

my name and address

 

Your ref: 000000 4th February 2007

 

 

Messrs. Sechiari, Clark & Mitchell,

P.O. Box 499,

Upper Ground Floor,

1-5 Queens Road Quadrant,

Brighton,

East Sussex,

BN1 3XJ

 

 

Dear Sirs,

 

AAAA.AAAA -v- Lloyds TSB Bank plc - Claim No. 000000

 

I attach hereto a copy of my Allocation Questionnaire, together with a copy of the Draft Order for Directions, as delivered to ......... County Court in respect of the above action.

 

I trust I will receive a copy of your Allocation Questionnaire shortly. It can either be posted to the above address or sent to my direct fax number which is 0871 000000.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

The fax number I'm offering for their docs to come to me (if any materialise) is a freebie incoming only from Lycos. It's an 0871 number. No cost to me....no postage, no extra paper, no ink.

If only I'd known then what I know now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update.

Took AQ into my local court today. The lady behind the counter asked if I had sent a copy to the other side. I said I had faxed it and asked if that was OK. She replied that she could see no reason why not. I asked her if any of these claims against the banks had made it into this court. She knew nothing about all the banks being challenged for their charges, so, of course, I gave her the web address of the CAG site for all the information she needed.

 

I also asked her if she knew when I might expect a court date. She replied "a few months" I hope she's wrong. I thought the new draft directions speeded things up a bit. Just have to wait and see.

If only I'd known then what I know now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The new directions should speed things up, but that does not mean the case is listed for hearing any earlier.

 

The new directions give the judge the option of ordering that Lloyds file their documents within 28 days of when the order is issued and when invariably they do not, their defence is struck out and you win by default, this should occur a few months before you obtain hearing date.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Nothing was happening, we went away on holiday for a week and came back to find that a Notice of Allocation to the Small Claims Court at Guildford (hearing) had been issued for the 14th June at 1030 The judge had decided to ignore my request for the papers to be filed within 14 days I originally filed it in Staines. When I rang to ask them at Staines why it had been transferred, the nice lady told me that there were so many of these claims that they were all going together to Guildford The paper says it will take no longer than 1 hour and everything has to be filed no later that 14 days before the hearing. It's going to be the middle of June before this one is finished!

 

I'd better get started on the Court bundle soon. It really does seem so unfair that we have to do all this preparation work when SCM apparently do nothing at all and just settle without doing any paperwork. That's enough whingeing. Back to work and get that bundle underway.

 

Halifax is waiting in the wings and I might just have to start that one before the end fof TSB,

If only I'd known then what I know now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 years later...

This topic was closed on 2019-03-08.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

If only I'd known then what I know now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6233 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...