Big Claim aginst RBOS

[paulwlton]

Thinking back now, RBS sent my first S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) back with check enclosed.

 

I think Mrs Robbinson has shot herself in the foot by claiming the date on your router account was the date the CMS archive system was introduced.

Edited June 14, 2008 by paulwlton

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Sparkie1723]

[deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[paulwlton]

Here is the biggest laugh of all along with this witness statement they have submitted a bill of costs for attending a 2 hr hearing......wait for it..............£ 3,725.32 plus travel.............:rolleyes:

 

 

E-BAH-GUM. I can't see the DJ awarding costs that are inflated just to intimidate the LIP. Cobbetts are a disgrace. The DJ in my recent application hearing allowed only half the costs submitted as he knew they were seriously taking the pi** and made the solicitor fully aware of the fact.

 

You can bet your life that the Barrister is brought up from London, and that he travels first class.

[Sparkie1723]

Ideletd

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[citizenB]

By the way everyone did I tell you that they are sending a solicitor AND a Barrister to this Application hearing against me a litigant in person to an informal application hearing.

 

Who???? is a little bit worried do you think????

sparkie

 

I rather suspsect it isnt you that is worried

 

I sat up on my laptop last night and did some more maths home work, I hope it can be understood what I have now come up with..

 

The Bank have stated that this “router account” is in fact my personal account with a different “internal” number.

 

So if that is the case it should mirror exactly my personal account statements, would everyone agree on my reasoning??

 

You would think so, yes

 

Therefore there must be records somewhere of what this £171.57 shown as the “Book Debt” on this document, when it first became that debt and what it consists of?

Would everyone agree on that???

 

Absolutely.

There are no records or breakdown been given /shown.

Is it unreasonable that I should request these??

 

Not at all

 

Is it unreasonable to ask for an explanation as to why this sum of £171.57 is not shown on any of my personal account statements Numbered 40 to 49 which covers a period from Dec 2000 to September

2002.??

 

Perfectly reasonable request:)

 

Is it also unreasonable to request where the sum of £24.00 that is shown on the “router account” added to the Book Debt of £171.57 is shown on any of my personal account statements Numbered 40 to 49 which covers the period stated above??

 

Another perfectly reasonable request:)

 

Roll on Thursday

[DandD]

Sparkie

 

Why is it so important about the date of the 'Router Account'? I know they lied and said that these didn't exist untill 1999 but why did they say this? What have they got to gain by saying this?.

 

By the way,the docs should be in hyou in box by now.

 

Thanks

 

D & D

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[goonerjooles]

Hi Sparkie

Glad to see you're still rocking and rolling. We're all still rooting for you.

 

Jooles

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[car2403]

Hi,

a

Amillion thanks for the email stuff.

They are attempting to convince the court that this "router account" is my personal account and that router accounts were only introduced on 19th June 1999 and the book debt IS my personal account as at that date of £171.27 DR.........BUT my personal account was in credit on that date they say it was created, can you follow my gist...

I can prove that my router account is a falsley created account and from the dates shown on yours prove to the judge that they have made fraudulent false statements in 2 statements of truth by saying this system was only introduced in 1999....your account shows and proves they were in existence in 1996.

I don't think they can gain anything except put themselves in a very serious position.

 

I know looks complicated but it isn't really......

 

 

sparkie

 

You're going to need a witness statement from DandD to say that this is a router account, what date it was opened, and swearing the document shared with you is true and accurate.

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[paulwlton]

I'll throw mine into the mix. Looks like they've been up to their blue peter antics again.

 

 

Edited June 18, 2008 by paulwlton

[paulwlton]

Sparkie. The program's the same, but the bank claim the archive was set up on the date on your router, i beg to differ.

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[citizenB]

Oh, I would so like to be there on Thursday:D

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[paulwlton]

Just made a very interesting discovery the OIDFL01R Program is an archive program for dead,... written off,.... paid up,.... transferred accounts etc

The TIDFL05R Program is a live running program for "debt management" and this is the reason I HAVE got TWO accounts as I have clamed all along

No 1 Account The written off Book Debt of £171.57 account OIDFL1R.....thats gone

No 2 Account, is being run by the other "live program" TIDFL05R both of these accounts are my personal account also closed but its still running, and thats why I ve got Two book debts for the same account

THEY are in the Sxxxt on Thursday.

 

sparkie

 

Interesting. You've been doing your homework i see.

Edited June 17, 2008 by paulwlton

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[joesoap]

Wonder if Lisa's cacked herself yet?

[Sparkie1723]

[deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723