Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

council tax bailiff


alymac
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6300 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my girlfriend who is a third party to this was approached by a council tax bailiff last November, and was only left alone when she proved who she was and had no involvement.

 

this was regarding a unpaid council tax bill of £700 which my ex girlfriend.

 

i had to write to the council concerned to verify that i did in fact owe this money.

 

the bailiffs came back yesterday when i was at work and spoke with my gf who did not ask him him but came in on his own accord.

 

after my gf saying she had nothing to do with it, he still carried on talking to her about my debt with i believe to be in breach of the dpa.

 

he made inventory of the good which is incorrect.

 

i paid the full amount of yesterday on line direct to the council, minus the bailiff fee.

 

i did phone the information commissioners office today, regarding the breach in my dpa who did say that they should have not done this, then spoke to the bailiffs office who say they can sec 29 (3), then went back to the ico who told me the same again.

 

what i need now to know is.

 

1. was this a breach of my data?

2. what powers do the bailiffs have now there is no outstanding council tax, only there fees?

HALIFAX - £603.27 *WON*

HALIFAX CC - £245 *WON*

NatWest CC - £400 *won*

BARCLYCARD -£84 REFUND claim #6qz54472

YORKSHIRE 1 BANK £472.56 claim # 6qz53180

YORKSHIRE II £1373.37 moneyclaim

LETTING AGENT £200 REFUNDED

MISSES NATIONWIDE £764 *WON*

MISSES TOP SHOP GE CAPITAL*WON*

rbs £81*won*

total so far £4138.56

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the council tax has been paid then the bailiffs have no authority coming around. get a written letter of the council confirming that the liability order has been returned and also did your gf sign anything ?

CLICK HERE FOR A LOOK AT ALL OF MY FILES: http://s134.photobucket.com/albums/q82/bailiffchaser/

do not forget to click on my scale if i am giving you the right advice or advice is making sense click my scales otherwise others think i am not helping you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

only just got this out of my gf, bailiff took her work details and her mobile phone number. this has made me more mad than before. she said only signed this form with her details on it, which she is a third party.

HALIFAX - £603.27 *WON*

HALIFAX CC - £245 *WON*

NatWest CC - £400 *won*

BARCLYCARD -£84 REFUND claim #6qz54472

YORKSHIRE 1 BANK £472.56 claim # 6qz53180

YORKSHIRE II £1373.37 moneyclaim

LETTING AGENT £200 REFUNDED

MISSES NATIONWIDE £764 *WON*

MISSES TOP SHOP GE CAPITAL*WON*

rbs £81*won*

total so far £4138.56

Link to post
Share on other sites

she has signed a walking posession. Did she actually see what she signed ?

CLICK HERE FOR A LOOK AT ALL OF MY FILES: http://s134.photobucket.com/albums/q82/bailiffchaser/

do not forget to click on my scale if i am giving you the right advice or advice is making sense click my scales otherwise others think i am not helping you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can anyone clarify if the bailiff can speak to a third party who is not named in the debt?

 

can the bailiff take a third party's work details and her phone number?

 

the debt is now paid ed minus the bailiff's fees what powers does the bailiff have to collect his fees, payment made on line direct to the council.

 

does the bailiff have to leave a copy off the enforcement regulations and there fees?

HALIFAX - £603.27 *WON*

HALIFAX CC - £245 *WON*

NatWest CC - £400 *won*

BARCLYCARD -£84 REFUND claim #6qz54472

YORKSHIRE 1 BANK £472.56 claim # 6qz53180

YORKSHIRE II £1373.37 moneyclaim

LETTING AGENT £200 REFUNDED

MISSES NATIONWIDE £764 *WON*

MISSES TOP SHOP GE CAPITAL*WON*

rbs £81*won*

total so far £4138.56

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in a similar situation to Alymac, where 3rd party has knowledge, despite searching allrelevant sites on data Pro. and the bailiffs I cannot find whether they have breached the law. IMO they have, a party who is not involved in the debt should have not have had their particulars taken. Local authorities seem to be above the Law? Anyone know????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi alymac, Bailiffs have a code of conduct regulated by the OFT I believe, try reading through this thread, it may make it clearer what breaches they have made or improper conduct they have used.

Examples of codes of conduct

 

 

Hope it helps!

Friendship costs nothing but its rewards can be priceless. Do not judge, as you will not be judged but if you can, try and assist where possible.:smile:

everyone is entitled to MY opinion!:D

I offer my comments without prejudice or liability.

If you found my advice helpful, please click the scales at the top.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest MizzPiggy

Dear Alymac,

 

To answer your first question, the Bailiff fees must be paid. Unfortunately the system is that they are usually paid first before the money is paid to the council so in this matter, yes the fees still need to be paid to the Bailiff Company/Bailiff. The Council if you have paid the money, may well reject the payment as it is minus the Bailiff fees.

 

I urge you to check as I am sure you do not want the issue to return.

 

Secondly...Bailiffs, despite all that is stated are able to question neighbors etc to whether you still live there and ask questions in relation to this to establish whether the debt is collectable or not. However.......

 

1) The Bailiff had no right to enter the premises and levy on an inventory as the debt from what I understand is not yours but your ex's.

2) The Bailiff had no right to enter if the warrant was not in your name.

3) The Bailiff has no right to discuss the matter with anyone but you.

 

Unfortunately, the OFT rules around this are to cover civil debts not in fact the Bailiff Industry and their behaviours. This is more so for their own regulating bodies, ESA and the ACEA.( Don't hold you breath in waiting for action or help though from the above...).

 

Where to go and what to do?

 

1) Call the Council and find out whose name the warrant was in.

 

If the warrant was not in your name and only your ex's, you would have a claim against the Bailiff and their Company for trespass and the Council for instruction.

 

If the warrant did have your name on it, don't give up hope, the behaviours were still not ok!

 

2) Council Tax Bailiffs must be certificated to collect and a formal complaint about his actions can be made by making a complaint to the court that he is certificated at. To do this you will first need to check if he is certificated. This can be done by phoning 0207 210 0516 and giving the Bailiffs name and Company he works for.

Once you know that he is Certificated, then you can download the Complaints form at http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/form4_0606.pdf

 

fill it in and send it to the court.

 

If he is not certificated, then please ask for more information!

 

If you need help, please feel free to ask or contact me.

 

Alison

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which company dont tell me Rossendales..........

Law Pack & Small Claims Procedures Ordered Via site :) received 26/10/2006 I thank you :)

 

Claiming contractual @ £1.40per day ;) take your time Mr West

 

Can't wait to donate my 5%............. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

this is were I'm at, the council tax has been paid in full direct to the council, who are not going to sent the payment back.

 

i do have issues with the conduct of the bailiffs in which the way they have gone about serving this debt.

 

i have complain to the council who has forwarded my complaint to the bailiffs company, i received they response today which never answered any of my concerns saying they acted properly.

 

1, they turned one day as my new non liable girlfriend was leaving to go to work, he addressed her with my ex gf's name, which new gf replied no, he carried on accusing her of being my ex, and told her that he was there to collect unpaid ct, he did not let off until new gf showed him her id.

 

2, he left with out serving any documents about this debt or company details,

 

3, second visit, different bailiff but did address gf with here correct name, asked to complete paper work and has she turned to get pen he followed her in,

 

4, this time did a levy on goods in the house, which must belong to new gf anyway,

 

5, can he do a levy on goods when there is no person on the warrant present,no signatures on the levy.

 

6, also this is what i find disturbing, he took my new gf's work details down and her phone number on a matter she has no liability.

 

7, they charge 4% on all card transactions.

 

8, still writing to me with both mine and ex gf name,

 

9, are their fees still enforceable with the same virgor as there is no council tax outstanding.

 

10. can they write to you stating that they have now instructed a auctioneers ti advertise you goods, clearly this is only intended to scare you into paying,

 

11,is this levy still enforceable as is dated 4/1/2007 and there is no outstanding tax.

 

12, can they add more fees to this if i hold payment

HALIFAX - £603.27 *WON*

HALIFAX CC - £245 *WON*

NatWest CC - £400 *won*

BARCLYCARD -£84 REFUND claim #6qz54472

YORKSHIRE 1 BANK £472.56 claim # 6qz53180

YORKSHIRE II £1373.37 moneyclaim

LETTING AGENT £200 REFUNDED

MISSES NATIONWIDE £764 *WON*

MISSES TOP SHOP GE CAPITAL*WON*

rbs £81*won*

total so far £4138.56

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm not sure how they enforce council tax arrears but i do know that i had a case with the baillifs and their extortionate fees.

 

I had magistrates fine which i forgot to pay as i had a lot of others debts to pay at the same time. bailiffs sent me a letter and charged me £50 for the privilige. They then came to my house at 5am in the morning and posted a letter through the door saying that they had called but i was not there so they charged me £60 'visiting fees'. i know they knocked the door that time in the morning as i was getting up for work!

 

i phoned up the bailiffs office and said i would pay the fine but will not pay their fee's. after a bit of a conversation with the lady on the phone she said 'hang on a sec...' and turned the recorder off and started speaking to me again. basically she said to send a cheque in as payment of the fine minus the bailiffs fee's and include a letter stating 'this payment is for ONLY THE FINE not the bailiff fee's'. she went on to say that they do not chase up payment of fee's.

 

i dont know if your bailiff company will work the same though

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...