Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mould growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behaviour as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Allocation questionaire help (sorry for the length)


redkat74
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Fully Skinted

 

It looks as though yours is very similar to mine, although there are some differences. I am not 100% sure on what to put in section G on the

AQ. Mine is due in on the 21st Jan the same, can you give me a few pointers on the section G or is it just similar to what you put with the releveance to my own case?

 

Cheers Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

redkat

Yeah, from what I know, (not a lot lol) you just use the same template (you could use mine if youre attaching the propsed order for direction) and anything else relevant to your case.

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Bookworm

 

think i might have done it again but will continue on this one from now on.

 

I need help woith the allcation questionnaire N149 think i may have filled it out wrongly in section G. I looked at the step by step and the help section and have written in the info given but my clain is for only 1200k so is this the wrong info to put in? also do i need to add my schedule of charges when io sen this in? I have not refered to it in section g

 

Cheers :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try adding this:

 

Also in section G add something like the following:

 

"I am respectfully requesting my claim be heard via the small claims

track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and

not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the

defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed

or even reflect their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their

actual costs and I am surprised the defendant did not counterclaim

for these, as I would have paid them without argument. However,

the continuing problem is (in common with the hundreds of other

cases currently being brought by other bank customers) that the

banks are refusing to reveal the details of their penalty-charging

regime, and that the charges they apply to accounts for exceeding

overdraft limits and so on are entirely disproportionate to the

actual costs the banks incur. As the banks have a fiduciary duty

towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly

and in utmost good faith. Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that

the court in this case, not withstanding allocations to the small

claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in

the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid

end to this litigation. I have attached the schedule of the charges

I am claiming for to this allocation questionnaire to show a

breakdown of the amounts for the courts perusal.

I believe the case will take no longer than 1 hour".

 

You'll have to write it in quite small handwriting as it only just fits in the space provided.

 

Hope this helps, but it depends if your using the new approach or not.

 

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Laineybelle

 

have sent in my AQ to the court but still not heard anything it had to be in for the 21st jan. Did get a call from barclays debt collections again the guy said on the phone again that i had to make immediate payment to bring my account into order. I explained the situation and said i did not have the money and that it was bascially all charges and interest from barclays anyway. He said that when i had an update about the court case to ring and let them know. why? i dont know why they cannot talk to each other.

 

anyway can anyone tell me how long it usually takes for the court to get back to me about the AQ?

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi redkat,

 

Glad you got your AQ in safely. I have no idea about exact dates but I do think it takes a few weeks to get a date. I have read that some people do ring their Courts though after a while and have been told once the date is set over the phone. Leave it a couple of weeks then try giving them a call.

 

I have also read on another thread (Welshman is the one offering the advice) about sending a letter in to Barclays basically saying that whilst you can not pay off the whole overdraft you can afford to pay £? a week (even as little as £10) and with the letter include a cheque for the first payment. Welshman advises that you have made a gesture towards paying the debt off and by including a cheque inviting them to cash it and then once they have cashed it they have basically accepted your offer. This may bide you a bit of time whilst the claim is sorted out and may even keep them badgering you on the phone as you are making payments towards it.

 

Did you send a schedule of charges again with your AQ after as I don't understand why we should need to send another one in.

 

Laineybelle

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all

 

Still not heard form the courts so will contact them this week, can it get to a situation where i dont know the date if i dont contact the court?

 

just want this to end.

 

Laineybelle thanks for the advice, i think it might be too late to offer any payment scheme to barclays as i have repeatedly told them that i will not be able to sort anythig until the court case is resolved.

 

we will see.

 

Cheers :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Redkat,

 

If its easy for you to call I would. From reading other threads (the Leeds Court Case one is very interesting), some people seem to get really late notice on their Court date. A few have literally been days before and then panicked about getting their Court bundles in, in time.

 

I am going to ring the Courts next Friday (that will give them just under 2 weeks) just to check on progress.

 

Good luck

Laineybelle

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone just back for an update and advice,

 

I rang the court last week to find out if i had a court date as I hade not heard anything. They told me it was set for the 8th March which was disappointing as I had indicated in the relevant section of my AQ that I would not be available between the 2nd and the 10th March. The court admitted an oversight and said it would be reallocated. I phoned back and was told that nothign had been done as i had not submitted this in writing! So sent a letter that day and am now waiting for a date.

 

Barclays on the other hand have continued to phone me from their debt collections agency but are now just asking for updates on the case situation, which seems odd that they dont talk to their other departments. I received a letter from them today saying that they have cancelled my account and overdraft and I now have to return my cheque book and bank card or they will send agents to collect them??!! the threat of debt collectors i presume. I still have a joint account with them which they cannot touch i think??

 

So currently i am looking to prepare my court bundle and have looked a Jonni2bad's thread about this and good god its 318 pages (the court bundle not the thread) will endeavour to replicate this with my own information. Just wondered if you actually need to include a print out of all the acts and relevant subsections?

 

has anyone gone to the local CAB to ask for legal help with preparing this document or any thing else?

 

wishing it would end :Cry:

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Success, what happend was, THe courts sent me a date of 8th march which i had put in my AQ that i was unavailable for so I wrote in to have it changed. They set a date of the 23rd March, I went away on holiday 3rd to 10th march i was in france. On the 7thof march i was getting frantic phone calls from barclays. The courts had not informed them of the change of date. So i spoke to Paul Quinn he said that he had sent a letter refunding the full amount claimed. I said great will talk on monday when i was back. Got home got the letter which had a duplicate in it to sign and send back. Now i have been a bit slow in signing and returning this letter. On the monday i was back i check my bank account and the money had been refunding into it so, i just forgot about the whole thing. Today Paul Quinn phones saying that he needs copy of the letter otherwise he cannot release the money. Eh!!!?? stupidly i said that it had already been paid into my account, he was a bit thrown by this and said that that was an error and should not of happened. If only i had played dumb i might of had two payments!!. It seems they just cannot get anythig right. My saga with the Bloody BB has not ended though, i have a complaint in with the ombudsman for about 400quid they took unfairly even though i had used the right of appropriation. And also I am claiming 200 quid in charges and interest which they applies to the account while the court saga was progressing and because i was over my over draft it was something ridiculous like 2.05% per day. My remainig overdraft goes into my debt management plan and barclays have issues a termination notice because the offer of repayment is not enough for them. Oh well we will see where this goes. Anyway stick with it everyone they will always pay up, after announcing record profits this year why would they allow these floodgate to open. Good luck everyone. I will be donating to this site even though i did not get my money in my hand they used it to pay off the overdraft, this site is fantastic and thanks for all the helps. :-):-):-):D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...