Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • As a former NHS manager in a mental health trust... I agree 100% with the actions recommended by stu007.  And I would make especially clear in your letter(s) of complaint that you are extremely concerned about the whereabouts of any confidential letter that was intended to be sent to you in the handwritten envelope.  (Indeed, the fact that a handwritten envelope addressed to you was used would suggest to me that they definitely had something to send you.  It also sounds a bit odd to me that the envelope was handwritten).   As well as complaining in writing to them, I'd contact the clinical team by 'phone first thing on Monday, explain what's happened and tell them to ensure that any confidential information about you that has been sent to a third party must be recovered immediately, and you want confirmation of that.  Well that's what I'd do - see if others think it a good idea or not.  If that had happened at my trust, heads would roll.   There's another poster on these boards called "think about it".  They're involved (I think) in GP practice management and may have some comments too about patient confidentiality.   Oh - I think I would include a photocopy of the handwritten envelope in my complaint to the trust and the ICO.   (I've got to ask - can you say what trust it is?  Don't say if you don't want to.)   EDIT:  And well done for contacting the other person to tell them what's happened.  You did the right thing
    • Hey, thank you very much again for your replies!   - We go to the branches and ask for business accounts, but as I give them my personal name they register them as sole trader accounts in their systems, regardless of my company name being on the agreement.  Suspended our services for high volume messaging -- that is not explicitly covered in terms and conditions Send us letters referencing wrong terms and conditions that we did not sign Terminate the contract and come with a random balance number. We argue unsuccessfully, but they don't follow up with the requested deadlock letter. Pass our account to Lowell in 2017 I pick the account back up when I notice it is affecting my credit file in 2020 I work on the case for about three weeks and file a complaint with CISAS I give Lowell my contract and they see it is my company's name on it so they pass it back to Vodafone Vodafone wants to settle my account quoting they should not charge me anything on the first place and they offer £250 as a compensation for distress. I mistakenly accept the offer because of confusing wording and thinking that the third party adjudicator was already involved in the case, although they would basically get involved on the later stage.  I make a complaint as per CISAS and try to reverse the settlement in the system and have third party adjudicator having a proper look into my case and hopefully reward me a much fairer compensation for all the damages.    I have made a SAR request with both Vodafone and Lowell so far, but still waiting for the Vodafone to send it.    I am now waiting for CISAS to respond, but because I am still upset how much damage this has caused me I am considering taking them to small claims court.  For that I am researching what are the acts I would have to reference in that case.   Obviously Consumer Rights Act 2015 and then Data Protection Act 2018 and perhaps some acts regarding entering into contractual agreements -- can you help with that maybe?        My main concern at the moment is to how to express claims well in a legal language, because £250 they offered feels just patronizing given that there has been everything clearly written in black and white, yet I have had to go though this damaging and humiliating experience. 
    • Cooling off periods do not apply to faulty items. The cooling off period relates to a distance purchase of an item which is of satisfactory quality. Where an item is faulty then it become subject to the rules under the Consumer Rights Act
    • I understand the cooling off period for online purchases, but this is a little different due to the item being collected/paid in person.    A used item was recently sold by auction on eBay. The seller inspected, paid with cash and collected the item in person.    The buyer is now claiming the item to be faulty.    If this transaction was completely remote and the item posted, I would absolutely expect the buyer to be entitled to a refund.    But as the transaction happened in person would the point of the money changing hands be when the contract is made? Therefore not giving the buyer any cooling off period?   I think this is the key information; Used item Paid in person Working when collected Private sale   Thanks!
    • This article has some useful information on how things are working during the Covid crisis.   https://www.theguardian.com/money/2020/jun/06/a-guide-to-probate-everything-you-need-to-know   HB
  • Our picks

red1

Bailiffs..Wrong Name, Right Address

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4899 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

My father-in-law left us a house which we rented out. Anyway to cut a long story short, the tenant trashed the house and left. Since then Powergen have tried to chase me for the £700 unpaid gas bill. I informed them, and sent them the tenancy agreement, to show that I did not live at this address.

 

Two weeks ago a hand delivered letter came to my house, with the tenant name (from rented house) and my address and on it saying they would be coming to sieze my goods.

 

I am sick to the back teeth of trying to sort this out.

 

So can I let them load the goods then tell them that this address and my goods are nothing to do with the tenant, or am I pushing it a bit. Also if they took the goods would they be liable for theft?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not a good idea to leave things as they are. And you will have to sort out the problem if you wish to let out the house again.

 

Was the letter from a bailiff acting on a Court Order? If anyone does call

at your house, do not let them in. The last thing you want is your possessions

to be removed. Forget about possible compensation etc that may follow

the levy, it will not make up for the hassle and time expended.

 

If it is a Court Order you have then it certainly wouldn't be theft since the

bailiffs would be acting under the instructions of the Court. And your best

solution there would be to apply to the Court to have the judgement set aside

so that you can put your case to them and have the Court Order quashed.

 

If it is not a Court order, write to Powergen and point out that you are not

the tenant, nor has the tenant ever lived at your current address, and you are looking for the person too since they also owe you money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have already explained this to them, and sent the tenancy agreement to them. Powergen accept the debt is not mine,as do the bailiffs. The problem is that they have put the tenants name on my home address, which the tenant has no association with. I have twice provided them with a rough idea as to where the tenant lives (The boyfriend assaulted someone and his address minus the road number was in the local paper). The thing is I am sick of trying to sort this out as I have spent hours hanging on phones listening to Beethoven's unfinished symphony (which will probably be finished by the time I sort this out).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi red1

 

Who's name is on the powergen account. Is the account in your name or the tenants. If yours, then they will hold you responsible for money owed, if the tenant is named on the account then it is not your responsability if they organised this themselves. If however, you organised the powergen account for them then :-

 

In a case where a landlord had taken out a gas supply in his tenant's name, the judge ruled that the tenant was not liable to pay the bill. The gas supplier's use of the tenant's name on information supplied by a third party did not create a contractual relationship. It might also be possible to use this case to argue an electricity case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Billy

I originally arranged a gas supply with British Gas, however the tenant then switched to Powergen still using my name. However, I did not know this till after the tenant left. Powergen accept my version of events as they have no correspondance between us, and they have agreed to chase the tenant for the money. Like I say the bills are now coming in the tenants name, just to the wrong address.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Red1, my original advice was wrong in that it didn't take into account the warrant was not in your name.

 

However, the law states that the claimant [Powergen] must apply for

the default to be withdrawn if they know that the notice of default

was not delivered.

Under the "Civil procedure Rules 1988 [statutory Instruments 1988]

section 13.5 [2] Claimants Duty To Set Aside Judgement

If a claimant who has entered judgment subsequently has good reason to believe that the particulars of claim did not reach the defendant before the claimant entered judgment, he must -

 

(a) file a request for the judgment to be set aside(GL); or

 

(b) apply to the court for directions.

 

Should Powergen opt not to exercise their duty to apply for a set aside or instructions then I believe you can apply to the Court under the

same Act

 

13.3 - (1) In any other case, the court may set aside(GL) or vary a judgment entered under Part 12 if -

 

(b) it appears to the court that there is some other good reason why -

 

 

(i) the judgment should be set aside or varied; or

 

(ii) the defendant should be allowed to defend the claim.

 

(2) In considering whether to set aside(GL) or vary a judgment entered under Part 12, the matters to which the court must have regard include whether the person seeking to set aside the judgment made an application to do so promptly.

 

So you must get your skates on and nip this in the bud. Check first with

Powergen and see if they will apply for a set aside because they served the summons on the wrong address and therefore the defendant [your

ex lodger] did not receive the summons.[Advise them of their statutory duty].

If not, then you should apply under 13.3 to have the default set aside.

Doubtless you may be able to add compensation to your case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say you originally organised a gas supply with british gas red1, where you living there at the time or did you organise this for the tenant (the agreement in your name but paid by the tenant), or was the rent paid by the tenant organised to include a payment for gas/electricity? Did the tenant pay all other household bills such as council tax, water rates etc in their own name? Or was this included in their rent and still in your name?

 

I understand your point that the tenant changed the acount to powergen still using your name which they should not have done but what was the arrangement before this. It helps if this can be clarified so that you can protect yourself and complain if your details have been used by the tenant fraudulently. Although you have tried to deal with powergen and it is a pain in the a*rse, if you can sort this with them once and for all, then the bailiff should be taken out of the equation all together. It is important to establish your position first before deciding on what further action you can take to resolve this issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for all the advice,

When we inherited the house it was delapitated. There was no gas supply. We completely refurbished it. I paid a thousand pounds for a supply to be put into the house by British Gas (using my name). The tenant then took the house. She switched from British Gas to Powergen using my name. After running up a £700 gas bill and smashing the house she left owing £2000 rent.

 

I have never at any time resided at this house.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...