Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tatter v Halifax ****WON ****


TATTER
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6314 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

came accross the site while reading money saving expert.com. I started my claim through that site and have since been getting advise on here.

 

My claim is at the stage where they have nine days till I file a claim with the court, The amount they owe me is £2162,00. I have today recived a settlement offer of £1587,00 which I was very tempted to accept but with a little help from some very nice people on here I have decided to move on for the full claim.

 

I am myself quite scared and find it daunting but with help & support from the many people on here I hope to be as successful as many others.

Good Luck All!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Tatter and welcome to the site go for 100% as its better in your pocket than theirs !:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi tatter

 

Don't worry about a thing. I have already done the Halifax and it was like taking candy from a baby. They really do not like anyone questioning their 'authority', so just enjoy the experience... i have never smiled so much as i have since joining the group..

 

Well done for getting this far, just play it cool.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Got £2000.00 out of em with one simple phone call this morning!

Thanks to everybody that gave advice and support you are the greatest people I have never actually met!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

CONGRATULATIONS !!!!

Amazing result.........thread moved from welcome and re-titled:D

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had a light bulb moment while having a shave!

Is it correct that I could only claim 6 yrs from the date I started the process? If so then Im up on what I should have claimed for I think.

 

I started on december 14 2006 so I should only go back to december 14 2000 so charges I claimed before that date were not within the 6 yrs.

 

my total claim was for £2162.00 but settled for £2000.00 (162.00 down).

The amount I should not have been able to claim came to £275.00 which means in a way Halifax have paid me £113.00 intrest!!!

Am I correct with this or still in euphoria?

Link to post
Share on other sites

CONGRATULATIONS Tatter,

 

On the point of can you claim more than six years, There are some test cases due soon.But reading through this site the 1980 law deems that the banks are at fault and therefore have taken our money illegally so I for one am going now to try and get charges back to 1980. I have already had all costs paid back by the Halifax for six years and Alliance and leicester for last two years. So lets go for it keep them on the run. Then hit um when they are down!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...