Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RP1978 vs Lloyds TSB, First Direct & MBNA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6314 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I am currently taking on the three institutions above with varying degress of success.

 

First Direct have been excellent and have offered full settlement with no problems.

 

Lloyds TSB have been a little slow in returning Bank Statements however received them today and have returned a request for £2337.

 

My problem lies with MBNA, they have not returned the requested statements, instead have credited my account with £490 as a goodwill gesture. I have roughly calculated that unlawful charges amount to £1016. Can anyone confirm how likely I am to acquire the full amount? The letter I have received seems quite heavy and working in the financial services myself seems correct. They state that I agreed to the charges when I signed up for the said Credit Card and that they are within their rights to charge me, therefore would I have a leg to stand on in court? if not should I accept the gesture? Any thoughts would be greatly received.

 

Many thanks in advance

 

RP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I am sorry that I cannot help you with your problem - I am sure that you will have lots of replies to your post and very good luck with your claim.

 

Could I possibly ask you whether you added interest on your two successful bank claims or did you just ask for your charges back,,,How lond did the process take you and also do you actually have an account currently with either of them - I worry that my bank might ask me to close my a/c with them should I put in a claim.

 

Again, apologies for not being able to help with your queries - good luck. Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

First Direct was settled without interest however I did not have the account for long and therefore it would not have amounted to much.

 

Lloyds is my current account, they have not come back with an offer yet! I have opened a new account with A&L in anticipation of Lloyds closing mine, if they do not then I will stay with them.

 

Hope this helps

 

RP

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to MBNA, you should accept the offer as partial payment only. Let them know that you will pursue them for the rest in court if neccessary. There is a letter here to help with your reply.

 

 

YOUR Street

Town

City

Postcode

 

 

Date

 

BANK NAME

Address

Address

Postcode

Re: Account number XXXXXXXX

Response to settlement offer.

 

Dear [named sender or Sirs]

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, totalling £xxxx

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder, with a County Court claim if necessary.

 

My letter before action sent previously indicates that you have until xx/xx/xx to respond before Court action commences. You are reminded that there will be no extension to this timescale.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

 

Yours faithfully

[signature]

Good luck

Uk

 

 

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the case of MBNA did you send them a SAR for statements ?

If so then they are in breach of failing to comply.

If you did not do so then you should send one.

If you already know the amounts that you are claiming then carry on with the process.

You need to send them a letter before action stating that you will only consider settlement for the full amount of your claim.

You will need to ammend a charges schedule which show the refunds,and carry on for the rest.

As its not clear what communications you have had its difficult to advise precisely,but you should get the picture.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is brilliant thanks, they did not treat my DPA request as formal and therefore sent dodgy copies of the statements, should i send back the cheque and ask for full formal DPA request before accepting the part payment or should I stick with what I have got and go back requesting the full amount what do you think?

 

Cheers

 

RP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres a couple of ways you can go here.

There is a template letter in the bank library that will address this.

They have only partially complied with your request.

Have a look at that letter I think I would send it.

Meantime you can carry on with the process by keeping to the set timetable.

Once you get the remainder of your statements you will be more able to decide what to do.

 

Data Protection Act - Non-Compliance - Template Letters

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...