Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the property is not yours you are not on the deeds you are/were not ever on the mortgage..   stop trying to do their job in scamming you.        
    • Capital assessments are based on the:   amount or value of the asset at the time of the application outcome of checks carried out to protect against fraud As with income assessments the partner's share of the equity is included in these calculations - unless there is contrary interest. Just found the above in the law society website.  So am I screwed.  So confused.   
    • I am bound to say that their alleged contract is probably the weirdest I have seen. Considering it is supposed to be a serious legal contract to set out the conditions under which CEL manage the parking on land that does not belong to them it leaves a lot to be desired.   For a start it does not comply with the BPA Code of Practice which is   7.3 a the definition of the land on which you may operate, so that the boundaries of the land can be clearly defined b any conditions or restrictions on parking control and enforcement operations, including any restrictions on hours of operation c any conditions or restrictions on the types of vehicles that may, or may not, be subject to parking control and enforcement d who has the responsibility for putting up and maintaining signs e the definition of the services provided by each party to the agreement.   So no mention of hours: no mention of types of vehicle restrictions: no mention of who is responsible for the erection and maintenance of signage   and much more serious -no mention that CEL have to comply with the BPA Code of conduct-that one is listed on 7.1.    All it states is that the operator can pursue outstanding PCNs in accordance with the COP but that is not the same as saying that CEL will abide by the CoP which it must say.   Also AFAIK the only entity that can pursue for trespass is the land owner regardless of what this quasi agreement says. There is also no mention of the financial aspect of the arrangement nor how the long it lasts and what notice is required for either side to terminate.     It might be worth writing [not emailing ] to Medburn Estates asking them to confirm if this is the only agreement with CEL and whether they think it right that CEL have not received planning permission for their signs from the Council rendering their signs illegal which is more serious than unlawful and therefore all PCNs issued are worthless and should not have been issued as it is impossible to form a contract with motorists when the signs are illegal.   Also that as CEL are their agents Medburn Estates LTD are responsible for the actions of their agents. You could also ask them to cofirm that the signature on the paper is that of their Director, Anthony Brown and whether their copy has a counter signature of a CEL representative.   Carry on that CEL are taking you to Court and as another Judge has asked a Landowner to appear in front of him to explain their contract, whether it might be in the best interest of Medway to have a serious conversation with CEL to avoid any possible  embarrassments in your  [ie Laluna] Court appearance.   I have not looked much at your WS though it is looking good.   I would have mentioned that as they failed to comply with  Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007.   that they are in breach of their agreement CoP with BPA to keep to all the legal requirements in running their parking  operations.   It calls into question their right to apply for motorists data from the DVLA.   I would wait for their WS to arrive so that you can pick holes in that too. however watch that if they are late that you send yours off just within the Court guidelines.   What you are tying to do with your WS is to put your side of the case plus put CEL in as bad a light as possible for them to  decide that they don't really want to go to Court after all.
    • UncleB - where you write "This could lead you to facing the Bank in Court..."   1stly -  would that mean now?  by remote hearing?  Or when the courts open after the summer?   2ndly - Does the application for set aside automatically prevent the B hearing going ahead?   3rdly - Will sending in an application to have the B petition set aside mean that I have to disclose an address for service?   I can only give a mailing address   4thly - Could having an early (remote) set aside hearing potentially quicken up the process for the bank if I am obliged to give them a suitable place for service?  At the moment I assume the hearing was adjourned for lack of physical service.   I want/ need to get a set aside.  But don't want to shoot myself in the foot.  
    • Where I have sight of a letter which states the following: "a) the case is removed from scheduled date and time on the court list forthwith    b) the case will be re-listed on the 1st open date after x few months, a date to be advised" Is there any way a hearing would be any earlier than suggested?  Lockdown closed courts but may they open early?    Could the bank ask it to be brought forward even with lockdown still in place officially til end July?    Would that depend on them physically serving a b petition?   Could the 1st open date be any time up to Christmas with such a potential back log of cases?  
  • Our picks

    • View this quiz Employment status during COVID-19
      What do you do if you’ve been told not to come to work due to the current crisis.  Watch the video here or on the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page.

      Did you learn anything? Do the quiz
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 8 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 0 replies
    • One Parking Solutions - Damning judgement. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421148-one-parking-solutions-damning-judgement/
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 63 replies
    • View this quiz Coping with extreme hardship
      Life can be tough when you're entering the world of work and in the present virus crisis, things are even more difficult.

      Watch the video below or go to the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page . Afterwards, you can see if you've understood the points which are being made by taking the quiz.
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 8 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 1 reply
    • View this quiz: Pre-pay meters
      An explanation of how some gas and electric companies offer emergency quarantine support.

       
      Watch the video here – or go to the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page and watch it there. Then come back here and do the quiz
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 6 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 1 reply
datxman

Northern Rock B.S

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2969 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Just a quick question,

 

Has anyone claimed against Northern Rock for charges, I am getting stung for £30 per cheque charges.:mad:


Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you searched under that name? im sure ive heard some cases against them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done a search by most of them seem to be for either Mortgage or personal loans and not for bank accounts!


Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone let me know if they have claimed charges back from Northern Rock, I am sick of getting charged £30 a shot and I am now been laid off work so it is going to get worse I have just had a letter off them saying that they have took £60 for two returned direct debits. I don't get any notice of them taking it, it is just gone in one foul swoop.:evil:

 

I have really had enough of them.


Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I requested a hardship form from Northern rock as I am unemployed and I can't make payments to my debtors I have contacted CCCS who has made a payment plan for me. However I haven't received my hardship forms from Northern Rock so I phoned them today to say that I had not received them yet. And to my utter surprise they told me they had not been sent out as I am still in credit by 90p is this right.

 

I am finding the northern rock are a difficult bank to deal with they owe me £1340 in charges and have told me they will not look in to my case until the test case has been heard despite me claiming hardship.:eek:


Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I requested a hardship form from Northern rock as I am unemployed and I can't make payments to my debtors I have contacted CCCS who has made a payment plan for me. However I haven't received my hardship forms from Northern Rock so I phoned them today to say that I had not received them yet. And to my utter surprise they told me they had not been sent out as I am still in credit by 90p is this right.

 

I am finding the northern rock are a difficult bank to deal with they owe me £1340 in charges and have told me they will not look in to my case until the test case has been heard despite me claiming hardship.:eek:

Do you have priority debt arrears(mortgage/rent, council tax, utilities)?

Have you gone back to 27th July 2001 with the hardship claim?


.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can anyone give me advice,

 

I have recieved a letter from McKenzie Hall DCA for an outstanding debt which dates back to when I was married.

 

The company is chasing me for the debt however under the terms of the divorce it was agreed to that my ex-partner would take over the debt

(as it was a joint one) my ex-partner has entered in to a IVA to repay full balance due to divorce settlement.

 

This was accepted by NRAM who were the orginal creditors.

 

However now I find that this DCA is chasing me for the full amount.

 

Any thoughts of what I should do?

 

I need to send a letter off to them tomorrow so I need advice urgently

 

I have all the details of the IVA and who it was set up with I just need some help on what to put in the letter.

 

Thanks in advance.


Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

check the debt shows on your cfa file see below.

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you send the letter, address it to their compliance manager. Just inform them that the original creditor NRAM are aware your ex-wife is responsible for this account under an IVA. If you have any paperwork, send them a copy.

 

As DX suggests, check your credit record to make sure it is not shown on yours. If it is, then you need to ask for them to remove it.

 

Mackenzie Hall have a habit of not receiving letters or not replying. I would suggest sending by normal recorded or atleast getting proof of postage.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just checked my credit file and it does not appear on there, what do I do now.

 

Where do I find the details of the compliance manager


Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have just checked my credit file and it does not appear on there, what do I do now.

 

Where do I find the details of the compliance manager

 

Rob Sands is their Director of Compliance and you just send it to their Kilmarnock address.

 

Keep the letter basic and to the point. No point wasting ink.

 

i.e The account you are chasing was accepted by my ex-wife under a divorce settlement. The original creditors NRAM are aware of this and of the IVA arrangement that she has. May I suggest that you return the file to NRAM or the current owners of the debt and ask them to correct the information that they hold.

 

Please confirm by return that you have noted the above, that you have not processed any data regarding this account in my name and that you will desist in contact me regarding it.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help it has put my mind at ease, after reading about these people on this forum I will not hold my breath on a fast and easy solution.

 

But I am very grateful.


Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should simply ignore them. If you are happy the debt cannot be enforced why waste your time writing? They WILL go away if you ignore them- I know from personal experience.

 

Pretty much ALL DCAs go away if you don't reply. I have seen off over 30 with this simple tactic.

 

McKenzie Hall in particular can be ignored, most of what they chase is unenforceable and I don't think they ever do court.

Edited by give them FA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumb::thumb::thumb::thumb:

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

if everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the biggest financial industry in the UK, DCA;s would collapse overnight.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got another two letters from these muppets, should I ask for proof of debt or send a statuate barred letter with it not appearing on my credit file?

 

I have a copy of the IVA should I also send that or do I really need to go to a solicitor


Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what did this letter say?


The Tally so far in order of appearince:

Intrum Justica

:DNow gone from my life

Metropolition

:DGone and had to repay me 500 pounds

Red(Lowell)

:DCase Closed

Aktiv Kapital

:pWas so sad yo say good bye. Parting is such sweet sorrow.

MBNA :oops::-) No CCA No Debt You lost

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It says that they have wrote to me twice regarding the outstanding amount and that they have had no response from me.

then it goes on about how much is owed namely 16K then it says that the client with either get an attachment of earnings or put a charging order on the property and that I should phone them (yeah of course I am going to phone these muppets - not)

I have a copy of the IVA which states the full amount and that 29% is to be re-payed, but they are saying that because it was a joint account I am still liable depsite my divorce settlement saying that my ex will take over the debt.

Just want this to go away now I have already paid off about 25K of debt and cant aford anymore as I only work 2.5 days per week

 

Any ideas


Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why play their game? If you are clear that you're not liable, just bin the rubbish. As if they are going to risk a fairly large court fee when they don't have a clue what's going on- don't think so, do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If your ex-wife agreed in a legally drawn up settlment that she would take on sole liability for the debt, then you have the perfect defence that it is not your debt, so you shouldn't be worrying about it, especially as it is not on your CRA file.

 

I'd go along with the others on this and ignore them for the moment, however, don't throw away any correspondence from them as it can be very useful in the future, should you feel compelled to write in your defence. You can clearly state to them the fact that you are not liable/responsible for this debt and give them a very clear reason why.

 

If they persist, you'd be well served following Uncle B's advice. Simple, straight forward letter, stating the facts.

 

Don't send a statute barred letter as the debt is not SB if your ex has been paying it back through her IVA. It just sounds like this DCA are trying to fleece you.

 

Keep us informed as to how you get along and good luck!

 

H. x


Please note, I am not professionally qualified in legal matters. Should you have any doubts, you should contact a legal expert.

However, I can and will help with matters regarding payroll as I am fully qualified.

 

If I've helped in any way, you're welcome to click on my "star" and thanks, but I gain the most satisfaction simply by helping/reassuring :O)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, when I referrred to "binning" their letters I did mean metaphorically rather than physically. Don't throw away post, but replying to tossers like these only encourages them. Trust us, they will go away. Don't waste time effort and postage dealing with morons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just be aware that it still legally remains half your debt even though your divorce settlement says she will take responsibility for it. In theory they can come to you and your legal recourse would be then to go after her for it. However, as it is subject to an IVA and as you have your court order and these clowns don't know their ar@* from their elbow I would write a short letter. Say the debt is subject to an IVA end of and then ignore them (I assume the whole of the debt is subject to the IVA and not just half of it?). I sincerely doubt they will take it any further. And if they did (big if) then you still have this as a defense.


:lol:

Successfully claimed back mis-sold PPI (Barclays Bank) 2009-10 (£8500)

Ran a paid-for DMP. Deeply respect those who self-manage a DMP; it is possible to do with the help of fellow CAGGERS

Offered F&F to all my creditors. All closed out including a particularly intransigent and stubborn one - who eventually saw sense after 10 months of nonsense!

Does not condone debt avoidance but violently disagrees with the antics of debt collectors and their behavior towards the ones trying to pay. I am a great believer in what goes around, comes around. Keep up the good fight!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Just tried out noodle.co.uk and it clearly states the account is settled. I am in a dilema to send a letter to them or not, surely if the credit report states settled then I am not responsible as surely my ex has declared the full amount to them for the IVA and it was accepted by them. I spoke to the CAB who said if the bank accounts have been seperated for over 6 years then the account is statue barred as I have not paid any money to them and the fact that my ex was the main account holder ?

 

Any thoughts

 

Regards

 

Datxman


Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are reading way too much into these petty puerile letters.

 

Your reaction is exactly how these letters are designed to make you react.

It does not show on your credit file.

You have the evidence that this is no longer your responsibility.

 

If it is over six years since you paid them anything then yes it will be SB.


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks BB it is just another thing I can't deal with at this moment in time and the letters come thick and fast.

 

I just wasnt sure if my ex is paying the IVA if I would still be seen as being responsible for the debt.

 

That is what these muppets are saying.

 

I think I will just ignore the letters for the time being.

 

I am grateful for everyones advice on this you are certainly a help and I will donate to the CAG as they have been fantastic.


Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What you really must remember is that these letters have absolutely NO human input whatsoever, well less for the Posti pushing it through your letterbox.

 

They are ALL printed off and spat out by a computer that has been programmed to send these puerile missives at regular intervals, when they don't receive a response, the computer simply changes gear, up and until a human being tells it to stop, or it simply continues sending you the same lame idle threats.

 

YOU are the one in control,


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...