Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sazdeagle v Woolwich


sazdeagle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I filed my claim yesterday on the money claim site against the Woolwich for £353 and used a given template which is fine, but I now realise that i didn't include a list of charges nor did I put down my account number.

Feeling very sick and stupid about this, what a mistake!!!

Can anybody help me or advise me on what I should do now????

Pleeaassseee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ian cognito

Don't panic, you can't include a list of charges on MCOL, you need to send it in seperately, just reference you claim number on the spreadsheet and covering letter and send 2 copies, one for the court and one for the bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I filed my claim yesterday on the money claim site against the Woolwich for £353 and used a given template which is fine, but I now realise that i didn't include a list of charges nor did I put down my account number.

Feeling very sick and stupid about this, what a mistake!!!

Can anybody help me or advise me on what I should do now????

Pleeaassseee

Ok - you can send a copy of your spreadsheet to mcol at the followng address -

 

The Court Manager

Money Claim Online

Northampton County Court

21-27 St. Katharine's Street

Northampton

NN1 2LH

 

quoting your Claim Reference number on the schedule. Perhaps you can also quote your account number on a covering letter asking that they add the information to your file.Also send a copy of the spreadsheet to your bank.

Hope that helps

Regards Sandbag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Between the dates of 28/07/04 and 07/10/06 the Defendant applied numerous default charges to the Claimant’s bank account.

2. The charges applied constitute an unfair penalty under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations, which state: “A term is unfair if it requires any consumer who fails his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation”. The amount charged does not reflect the cost of the breach.

3. Under the law of penalties, the charges are an unlawful ‘extravagant’ penalty. Referring to the case of 1896, Wilson v Love, a charge is a penalty if it does not reflect an item’s true cost.

 

4. Under the County Courts Act 1984, the claimant is entitled to interest at a rate of 8% per annum from the date they were first deprived of the money to the date of this claim. This amounts to a total sum of £28.18 continuing to accrue at the statutory daily rate of 0.021% until judgment or earlier payment.

 

5. The Claimant therefore asks the court to enter judgment in their favour for the sum of £325 plus interest, amounting to a total of £353.18

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed,you will find that the staff are very helpful there.

You are not really making a change,it is a simply ommission,and their advice is usually that if it is only 1 thing as opposed to a few,then it should be ok.

I am moving the thread into Woolwich bank group as you now should be more comfy in the knowledge that you can proceed.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, so I sent the letter as I said I would!! However, the bank must think they're onto a winner as I have recieved a notice today that acknowledgement of service has been filed,and they are putting in a defence for the whole amount, in aaaagghh.

All within 9 days!!!

What happens now? Should I wait for the defence particulars to come through?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far Barclays/Woolwich have not made an appearance in Court. They will invariably settle with you in full,usually 7 days before the hearing date.

 

Dont be nervous, there is absolutely nothing to worry about...you will get all your money back

Preliminary Letter sent to Woolwich 05/06

LBA sent 19/06

Court claim filed 04/07 : Total £824.75

Acknowledgement of Service 27/07

Defence received 08/08

AQ filed 11/08

Barclays AQ filed 05/09

Hearing date 20/12

SETTLED IN FULL £840.49: 14/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your kind words of wisdom essjaysea, it's been 14 days today since they acknowledged the claim, so another 14 days to go. Probably be the very last day that I recieve the defence eh! If they don't manage the defence in 14 days time can I go on the claim site and order the money back???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...