AQ help please

[Conni]

Hello

 

Hope you all had a lovely Christmas and New Year.

Well back to the grind stone.

 

Got back from my Christmas break to find the AQ had arrived in the post and not the N149 as I had expected and was ready to fill in but the N150 which is for claims over £5000, sent in error but have to fill in in anyway. There is a part that is asking for directions which I am not sure how to fill in or even if I have to send any. Went onto the Jonni2bab Thread to find out how to fill in the AQ as it has a detailed explanation on how to answer all the questions for both forms.

 

If any one has any suggestions about the question F Proposed Directions would be very grateful for you help

thanks.

[TANZARELLI]

Hello

 

Hope you all had a lovely Christmas and New Year.

Well back to the grind stone.

 

Got back from my Christmas break to find the AQ had arrived in the post and not the N149 as I had expected and was ready to fill in but the N150 which is for claims over £5000, sent in error but have to fill in in anyway. There is a part that is asking for directions which I am not sure how to fill in or even if I have to send any. Went onto the Jonni2bab Thread to find out how to fill in the AQ as it has a detailed explanation on how to answer all the questions for both forms.

 

If any one has any suggestions about the question F Proposed Directions would be very grateful for you help

thanks.

 

Have a look hear: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

Tanz

[Michael Browne]

See here:

Allocation Questionnaire - Draft directions order

New strategy for Allocation Questionaires

[TANZARELLI]

also you could put in a request for standard disclosure something like this, which is often used for the small claims route in section G of the AQ:

 

This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and

not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the

defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed

or even reflect their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their

actual costs and I am surprised the defendant did not counterclaim

for these, as I would have paid them without argument. However,

the continuing problem is (in common with the hundreds of other

cases currently being brought by other bank customers) that the

banks are refusing to reveal the details of their penalty-charging

regime, and that the charges they apply to accounts for exceeding

overdraft limits and so on are entirely disproportionate to the

actual costs the banks incur. As the banks have a fiduciary duty

towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly

and in utmost good faith. Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that

the court in this case, not withstanding allocations to the small

claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in

the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid

end to this litigation. I have attached the schedule of the charges

I am claiming for to this allocation questionnaire to show a

breakdown of the amounts for the courts perusal.

I believe the case will take no longer than 1 hour

You can amend to suit.

I may be wrong so seek additional comment on this, please

Tanz

[TANZARELLI]

See here:

Allocation Questionnaire - Draft directions order

New strategy for Allocation Questionaires

 

Ah so i was worng please accept apologies if I confused the matter, I confused myself. However it would be ok to sak for standard disclosure here, would it not?

 

Tanz

[Michael Browne]

This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and

not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the

defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed

or even reflect their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their

actual costs and I am surprised the defendant did not counterclaim

for these, as I would have paid them without argument. However,

the continuing problem is (in common with the hundreds of other

cases currently being brought by other bank customers) that the

banks are refusing to reveal the details of their penalty-charging

regime, and that the charges they apply to accounts for exceeding

overdraft limits and so on are entirely disproportionate to the

actual costs the banks incur. As the banks have a fiduciary duty

towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly

and in utmost good faith. Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that

the court in this case, not withstanding allocations to the small

claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in

the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid

end to this litigation. I have attached the schedule of the charges

I am claiming for to this allocation questionnaire to show a

breakdown of the amounts for the courts perusal.

I believe the case will take no longer than 1 hour

 

If you include the draft directions order, delete the above in red, since this is what effectively the DDO is asking for.

[Conni]

Thankyou all I will add this