Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wescot's Refusal To Co-Operate


iwgunter
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5762 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

25-10-06

Sent Wescot the standard default removal letter asking for a copy of the original agreement, copy of the default notice and deed of assignment.

 

27-10-06

Letter received from Wescot stating:

I refer to your letter dated 25 October 2006

 

I note your request for copy of agreements and statement of accounts, however, the supply of these items only applies to on-going accounts.

 

With reference to the above accounts, ******** was acknowledged as being fully paiud and payment received on 27 May 2003, account number ******** is also fully paid and payment received on 17 May 2006. Therefore, the credit file records are correct, as they show that the accounts defaulted but were subsequently satisfied.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

J Munro

 

27-10-06

Sent Wescot letter saying they didn't answer my three questions in the original letter

 

27-11-06

Sent Wescot letter saying that they haven't replied to me and under Sec 78 of the CCA they are in breech and I will be informing the Banking Ombudsman, OFT and ICO.

 

Where can I go now? I'd like to look at the statements too, to see if I have been over charged.

 

 

Regards

Ian

Capital One - Charges

PAID OUT IN FULL WITH 8% INT

 

HSBC - Charges

PAID OUT IN FULL WITH 8% INT

 

Unfair Dismissal

PAID OUT FULL COMPENSATION

 

NCP PAD Parking 'Fine'

FULLY CANCELLED

Link to post
Share on other sites

write to wescot another couple of times and then goto to ico. that way you would have done half of the ico work for them. have a look at my thread and also look at the link on that thread as you will get a idea of the letter that you will reciev from the ico.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/54273-lodhi-finance-ltd-gillingham.html?highlight=LODHI+FINANCE+OF+GILLINGHAM

CLICK HERE FOR A LOOK AT ALL OF MY FILES: http://s134.photobucket.com/albums/q82/bailiffchaser/

do not forget to click on my scale if i am giving you the right advice or advice is making sense click my scales otherwise others think i am not helping you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you sent them the standard CCA request they have 12 days to comply by producing the documents requested. If they have not they are well in default of the 12 day limit and the calendar month so they should be reported to the OFT.

 

If they refuse to comply with other requests which fall into the Info Commissioner's remit then they should be reported to that office now. They shouldn't be given chance after chance to comply when everyone knows they won't. That's just wasting time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you report them now you will dragged down. write to them another couple of times. then report them. this way is the fastest.

CLICK HERE FOR A LOOK AT ALL OF MY FILES: http://s134.photobucket.com/albums/q82/bailiffchaser/

do not forget to click on my scale if i am giving you the right advice or advice is making sense click my scales otherwise others think i am not helping you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Nailpost. THEY ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO RESPOND WITHIN 12 DAYS. If they do not reply, they are in breach of the Credit Consumer Act. If a further 30 days pass and they have STILL not replied, then they have committed a criminal offence. You should report them to the Commissions Offfice and OFT immediately. Did you send them £1 and did you send letters by recorded?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Nailpost. THEY ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO RESPOND WITHIN 12 DAYS. If they do not reply, they are in breach of the Credit Consumer Act. If a further 30 days pass and they have STILL not replied, then they have committed a criminal offence. You should report them to the Commissions Offfice and OFT immediately. Did you send them £1 and did you send letters by recorded?

 

Its actually 1 calendar month so could be 31 days.If the last day falls on a Sunday or bank holiday then its an extra day.

Breaches of the Consumer credit act fall within the remit of trading standards intervention.

If the dca is outside your area then your local TS office can request the local office to the DCA to prosecute if a home agreement is in place.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading Standards are the relevant body to make a complaint but the OFT is the body responsible for issuing credit licences. In making a report/complaint to OFT you are questioning the debt collector's fitness to hold this licence. If enough complaints are received then the OFT may be forced to act. For the same reason I suggested everyone with a complaint about a debt collector should write to their MP and insist he/she writes to the OFT for a detailed response. The more pressure, the more likely there will be of a response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

The key to Wescot is persistance. I always used this address:

 

 

Process and Compliance Coordinator

Wescot Credit Services Ltd

PO Box 137

Dunedin House

45 Percy Street

Hull

HU2 8HF

 

It worked for me. I had a CCJ removed and my Debt written off. All in all it took four months of letters.

Completed:

Woolwich: Received £30

Intelligent Finance: Received £1100 after two years and approximately 20 letters, 6 pieces of hair and an eyeball.

Barclaycard: Received £90

HFC: Received £170

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received another letter from Wescot saying that they won't supply information on closed accounts.

 

Can anyone tell me where it explicitly states that they have to?

 

Ta

Ian

Capital One - Charges

PAID OUT IN FULL WITH 8% INT

 

HSBC - Charges

PAID OUT IN FULL WITH 8% INT

 

Unfair Dismissal

PAID OUT FULL COMPENSATION

 

NCP PAD Parking 'Fine'

FULLY CANCELLED

Link to post
Share on other sites

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

REFERENCE NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

We write to you regarding the telephone conversation with your department today, we have been informed by your department that the original signed agreement “which was requested as part of our original Data Protection Act request on 19/04/06 ” is missing!

We have given you time enough to supply the original signed agreement and you now have exceeded the 30 days you are allowed and by not supplying the document you are committing a criminal act under the legislation contained within section 77 (1) and section 78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

You are reminded that you were obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not, under section 189 of the CCA 1974

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

We give you seven days from the date of this letter to comply, otherwise we will be forced to take legal action

Take note at this stage, that any legal action you may contemplate will be both vigorously defended and contested. In the meantime please be aware that we consider this matter to be “in dispute”.

The time for compliance with our request has now expired. If you do not comply fully with my Subject Access Request within 7 days of this letter, We shall apply to the County Court for an order to enforce compliance, together with damages at the discretion of the court.

No other correspondence will be entered in to.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

This was taken from another thread but gives you an idea.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

How does this letter sound?

Dear Sirs

 

I have just had an interesting conversation with an employee of Wescot SPV Limited, who would not give me her name. It was at 10.22am on Friday 23rd February 2007 and lasted for approximately 20 minutes.

 

I have written to your company on 25th October 2006, 27th October 2006 and 27th November 2006 requesting you supply me with the following information:

 

1. A copy of the original agreement.

2. A copy of the default notice.

3. A copy of deed of assignment.

 

Each response I have received from your company states:

 

“I note your request for copy of agreements and statement of accounts, however, the supply of these items only applies to on-going accounts.”

 

This, I am sure you are aware, is not correct. You are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not, under section 189 of the CCA 1974. You have now had 121 days to supply me with this information, which you have failed to do, therefore you are committing a criminal act under the legislation contained within section 77 (1) and section 78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The time for compliance with my request has now far expired. If you do not comply fully with my Subject Access Request within 7 days of this letter, I shall apply to the County Court for an order to enforce compliance, together with damages and costs.

 

I have also forwarded a copy of this letter to the Office of Fair Trading and also to my local Trading Standards office and your Trading Standards office.

 

Regards

 

Also, is there anyway I can show to Wescot in this letter that I have forwarded it to the OFT and TS offices?

 

Ta

Ian

Capital One - Charges

PAID OUT IN FULL WITH 8% INT

 

HSBC - Charges

PAID OUT IN FULL WITH 8% INT

 

Unfair Dismissal

PAID OUT FULL COMPENSATION

 

NCP PAD Parking 'Fine'

FULLY CANCELLED

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does this letter sound?

Dear Sirs

 

I have just had an interesting conversation with an employee of Wescot SPV Limited, who would not give me her name. It was at 10.22am on Friday 23rd February 2007 and lasted for approximately 20 minutes.

 

I have written to your company on 25th October 2006, 27th October 2006 and 27th November 2006 requesting you supply me with the following information:

 

1. A copy of the original agreement.

2. A copy of the default notice.

3. A copy of deed of assignment.

 

Each response I have received from your company states:

 

“I note your request for copy of agreements and statement of accounts, however, the supply of these items only applies to on-going accounts.”

 

This, I am sure you are aware, is not correct. You are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not, under section 189 of the CCA 1974. You have now had 121 days to supply me with this information, which you have failed to do, therefore you are committing a criminal act under the legislation contained within section 77 (1) and section 78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The time for compliance with my request has now far expired. If you do not comply fully with my Subject Access Request within 7 days of this letter, I shall apply to the County Court for an order to enforce compliance, together with damages and costs.

 

I have also forwarded a copy of this letter to the Office of Fair Trading and also to my local Trading Standards office and your Trading Standards office.

 

Regards

 

Also, is there anyway I can show to Wescot in this letter that I have forwarded it to the OFT and TS offices?

 

Ta

Ian

 

Just a quick question....Did you apply for a CCA request or SAR?

CCA is £1 and SAR £10 but both have different statutory response times!

Im only asking as you havnt mentioned a SAR elswhere in this thread nor if you paid the fee!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read throught the

FAQ's and when your ready, start a thread in your banks forum to keep us all updated!

If the information I have provided is useful, please click the scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Excuse me if I am a bit thick on this but I have received a copy of my credit report and it says I am in default with Wescot SPV for £237. I have no idea what this is for, it was dated 29/5/2002, and no idea how to contact them to settle this default.

 

Can someone help me please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...