Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

County Court Judgement against someone


Lilolill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6314 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I dont KNOW where to post this but I need some Help and I KNOW you bods will be able to point me in the right direction

 

Okay So I am a floral designer took on a client on 2005 end to supply flowers for his floral tea room at a local cemetary

I have mobile phone call texts recorded with evidence of requests to supply

BUT it was cash sales and they gave me no reciepts I have invoices

it was a verbal contract on an ad hoc basis when he needed them I supplyed them

I have invoices charged to me for flowers I have bought at market

He also had use for a full year sundries and equiptment with out the ususal hire charges

can i add this as evidence

he is denying he owes me 400 he thinks its nearer 200

so what legal basis do I have with a verbal contract in this instance

PM me asap this is urgent

 

thanks

 

Lin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your post has confused me?

 

You took on a client, and agreed to supply flowers to his tea room at a local cemetery?

 

You have text message with evidence of request to supply...what exactly?

 

What exactly was the cash sales for which you were they buyer (in order for them to get a reciept but for you to have invoices?)

 

How come you have invoices charged to you for flowers you have already bought?

 

He has had a full years use of...what exactly? Was there any agreement that he would hire now, pay later?

 

Very sketchy question, and doesn't appear to make sense to me?

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

okay I agreed to supply the chap with wrapped flowers, funeral tributes and wreaths and seasonal sundries for his tea room at the local cemetary

 

I have texts that ask him do you require more supplies and returns of Yes please

 

I have recipets and invoices from MY wholesalers when i bought flowers from market specifically for his needs

 

He has had a full years use of my equiptment and display items which mormally are hired out per week

The agreements were verbal and witnessed by his assistant and deliveries witnessed by his landlord and taken by his assistant

He is not disputing he owesme money but the amount

Link to post
Share on other sites

In any of the texts etc did you mention how much the deliveries would be or do you have any paperwork at all mentioning how much you would be charging him?

 

If not, you're probably best getting a list of charges other companies would charge for the same services/products to prove your charges are valid/comparible.

 

Also does he owe for the whole year or part? Have you any kind of receipt of delivery for how much of a given product you gave to him?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm going to post your private message here, purely because it will help others to help you:

 

I have a small warehouse dealing mainly with silk displays and floral sundries Art and Craft supplies and evening tution classes

I offer fresh flowers for specific and to personal orders only I dont retail them to the general public as part of my usual stock

In Late October of 2005 I was approached by moderator edit his assistant, who visited me at my business address - to supply them on a regular basis with sleeved flower bouquets and also funeral wreaths on request, for them to resell at his New business - a tea room at the local Carleton cemetary near Blackpool

 

I informed him of my fresh flower capabilities

as stated above

and the fact that my unit does not have a cold room for long term storage.

I quoted a minimum starting price but stated the price would vary in accordance with the flowers seasonality and market prices

Once he took delivery he was responsible for the flowers their condition and resell

I DID not offer a sale or return policy with the small margins I was working on for him.

 

This he agreed to and we shook hands

 

I also provided him with a selection of silk tributes, silk floral displays, greeting cards. sympathy cards and other sundries ip until july

He became very fickle in his ordering sometimes demanding instant delivery and then not being there to accept delivery and pay me.

 

He admitted to me he had hit financial difficulties with his lease and community charges I allowed him extra time to pay me but he had not given me anything even after I had made several visits and phone calls

The last occasion I went to see him was just before Christmas. He became verbally violent and I called the police = who warned him of his conduct

He is NOT disputing that he owes me but the amount

I have reciepts from my suppliers specifically for the purchase of flowers for his requirements

It was a cash agreement His assistant was supposed to pay me on delivery and it turned out she would defer the decison to edited

In the end I could not sustain the non payment and refused to deliver unless I had some form of settlement

He told me he didnt have the cash yet I have personally seen new equiptment and stock in his premises

 

I have dated text messages asking for his needs and if he required suppiles and replies of yes please

 

I did not charge him for the hire of the sundries but they were returned in poor quality.

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legally, agreements and contracts can be verbal or written - both are as enforeceable as the other. However, disputes are common and written agreements are sometimes the only way of proving that something was agreed from the start or within the prescribed term.

 

The trouble here is that the other party is not disputing the debt - but only the amount, which (again) is very common. You need to imagine this case in a court - you, him and a judge. The judge knows nothing at all, and so it is up to each party to plead their case, along with forms of evidence. So if you were in a courtroom, and you said that the other party owed you £400, how would you go about proving the cost? You could so with bills, invoices and evidence to show how much you are out of pocket - this would be your damages (technically, liquidated damages). Next, you need to show that it was agreed that this is the amount which formed an express term of the contract - i.e. that he was aware that he would have to pay for certain items, the value of which you would have evidenced in the step previously.

 

If you can evidence that he had goods and services for which you have received no consideration for, then yes you can sue him for damages.

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it certainly would.

 

I think the answers have been dealt with quite well.

Its a Thorny issue......trying to come out of this smelling of roses could be complex,however to stem the tide of their defence you will need to be solid in yours.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it certainly would.

 

I think the answers have been dealt with quite well.

Its a Thorny issue......trying to come out of this smelling of roses could be complex,however to stem the tide of their defence you will need to be solid in yours.

 

 

smelling of roses

 

however to stem the tide

 

 

Surly an appology for the Pun is in order

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...