Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Next


hayley
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone and a Happy New Year to you all

 

I am hoping someone can help me with the following,

 

I have had a next catalogue for 2 years and always made my payments on time. My credit limit was £600 and in November they put my credit limit up to £2000. We needed a new fridge so waited for the sales and ordered one last week which was £600 i only had £300 owing on my account so this took it upto £900.

 

Then i had a letter off next saying:

 

They were unable to offer credit facilities and as a mail order company offering goods on approval we reserve the right to refuse any order, as stated in all our promotional literature.

 

As part of our processing operation we do consult a Credit Reference Burea and, under the Consumer Credit Act, you are entitled to know the name of this bureau, which is Experian.

 

So i rang then up and was put through to their Credit Management team and i spoke to a lady who said that basically when you order a large item they carry out more security checks and this is done by doing a credit check and they have decided that based on the information from the credit check they have closed my account. The lady then had the cheek to ask me to pay off my balance in full, i told her that i would pay the balance off as i would have normally by monthly installments.

 

Surely a credit check was carried out before agreeing to up my limit to £2000 and basically what they are saying is that i can order £2000 worth of clothes but cant order a £600 fridge. Is there anything i can do about it?

 

Thanks in Advance

Hayley

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone and a Happy New Year to you all

 

I am hoping someone can help me with the following,

 

I have had a next catalogue for 2 years and always made my payments on time. My credit limit was £600 and in November they put my credit limit up to £2000. We needed a new fridge so waited for the sales and ordered one last week which was £600 i only had £300 owing on my account so this took it upto £900.

 

Then i had a letter off next saying:

 

They were unable to offer credit facilities and as a mail order company offering goods on approval we reserve the right to refuse any order, as stated in all our promotional literature.

 

As part of our processing operation we do consult a Credit Reference Burea and, under the Consumer Credit Act, you are entitled to know the name of this bureau, which is Experian.

 

So i rang then up and was put through to their Credit Management team and i spoke to a lady who said that basically when you order a large item they carry out more security checks and this is done by doing a credit check and they have decided that based on the information from the credit check they have closed my account. The lady then had the cheek to ask me to pay off my balance in full, i told her that i would pay the balance off as i would have normally by monthly installments.

 

Surely a credit check was carried out before agreeing to up my limit to £2000 and basically what they are saying is that i can order £2000 worth of clothes but cant order a £600 fridge. Is there anything i can do about it?

 

Thanks in Advance

Hayley

Link to post
Share on other sites

True - but as your credit record is dynamic (changing daily) it doesn't cost firms that much more to initiate a credit check each and every time you you place an order that would put you in debt for £500 or more, irrespective of any previously agreed credit 'limit'.

 

You really need to seek oput the root cause, what has happned to your credit record between the time they increased your limit, and then said they weren't prepared to extend credit to you. There may be a wopping error that needs resolving, so a CRA file check is the first step.

 

As to can you force them to lend to you, the short answer is no. With the government banging on about 'responsible lending' what seems to be a change of heart for no reason, could be looked at as reasonable caution, and they'll not be held accountible for that, even though it stinks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very true, as many people keep lines of credit open which are invariably used when times get hard, or when they need to. This, unfortunately, places the company in a bad light and are told they have lent irresponsibly - however, when the credit agreement was signed, the customer was in good credit, well paid job and had no kids. Two years, 1 mortgage and a child later, they go back to using the credit they obtained using "credentials" which were deemed sufficient to be offered credit.

However, it might be a good thing - as now you would be owing £600. Why not save up the money as if you were paying a catalogue and then buy the item? That way you have done yourself an interest free deal, except when it's delivered, it's paid for already!

  • Haha 1

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...