Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Some Advice Please Re: Lloyds


lisaf
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5414 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I just wondered if anyone could offer some advice. Basically, we had a few bank accounts and loans with lloyds a few years back and we fell into financial difficulty. Suffice to say lloyds did nothing to help in our hour of need!

TBH, I am so completely confused with what we owe them that I'm not sure how I stand with reclaiming and S.a.r.'s etc.

For a start, the accounts are over 6 years old so do they have to supply relevant info. Also, we are paying Sechiari Clark and Mitchell (lloyds solicitors) £125 per month for a debt of approx £16,000 (made up of loans and overdrafts- I think). We also got a CCj for approx this amount, does this mean we're too late to do anything?

We are just starting to get things sorted this year financially for the first time ever and would love to get some sound advice.

Any help very much appreciated

Lisa

Also don't have relevant account numbers as it's quite a while back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lisaf.

Basically you can claim back charges for up to six years. Beyond that it becomes statute barred. To get your account numbers write to the bank giving your name and address(es) that applied at the time the accounts were active, date of birth and copies of any utility bills with your details printed on as proof of identity.

 

Spend a few days reading the FAQs and the step by step guide in the library section. That will answer most of your initial questions.

Start your own thread in the Lloyds TSB Forum and post any questions and progress reports there. Then we can tailor any advice you need to be relevant to your claim.

 

Good luck with your claim.

 

Regards, Rooster.

  • Haha 1

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lisaf.

 

Sorry. you're already in the right place.

 

Just blame it on a "senior" moment plus an excess of 12year old single malt.

:D :D :D

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Right,

I'm ready to pick up here again! It's only taken me almost 2 years but hey ho!

As it's been over the 6 years I know the charges are now statute barred (God I wish I knew about this site then)!

They have totally stitched us up over this little lot so is there anything at all that can be done?

Is a set-aside out of the question?

Any advice very gratefully received!

Lisa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

we are paying Sechiari Clark and Mitchell (lloyds solicitors) £125 per month for a debt of approx £16,000 (made up of loans and overdrafts- I think).

Did you send the SAR? Do you now know what you are paying Sechiari Clark and Mitchell for?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rory - yes i sent the SAR last week (i think) and nothing back as yet but then it is over the 6 year threshold?

Haven't paid SCM for some time now, we did have a court order for 100 per month but we just haven't had that money for the past few months. I know it's only a matter of time before they kick off again.

Many thanks

Lisa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although the accounts are over 6 years old they would still need to hold account information in terms of what you are actually paying them for. They will have information going back for at least the last 6 years, many companies keep records for a lot longer than 6 years.

 

Have you asked for a copy of the agreement for the loan?

 

Are you a homeowner?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Only if you asked for a copy of the agreement as part of the SAR. Did you do that?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rory,

right now back at work and more organised! Checked my file and cannot for the life of me find a copy of the sar i sent to lloyds! So damn sure i sent it but just in case, I have sent it off today from the template the encompasses the cca. I have sent it recorded.

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Rory, sent it to 'iqor' as they are the company dealing with it. Is that right or should it be lloyds?

 

Ideally you should have sent it to Lloyds. However Iqor have a duty as Lloyds agent to deal with it so it should be fine.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All,

right, finally rec's a response from iqor. All they sent over the weekend was a bunch of screen shot copies of activity (not much) on the account only going back to 2008 sometime.

So what do I do now? And is it worth trying to get this set aside (although it was a few years back now) on just the info that they have/haven't provided?

Many thanks

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just wondered if anyone knew how I could get hold of the court claim number for this as it was some years back and I can't find it! I need to try and get the original claim set aside.

Also, can anyone give me the link for templates for the threat of a visit by DCA?

Many thanks

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...