Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • The CMA’s latest monitoring report on road fuel shows that prices at the pump have risen since late January, accompanied by above average margins and spreads.View the full article
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Legal Direct Recoveries/CCA request/info wanted


go for it
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6297 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I hope someone can help, Ive read lots of threads for advice and at the begining of december I sent a cca request to westcot. I was after 10 days forwarded a letter. (which was sent to my old address dispite clearly giving westcot my new address) The letter said wescot no longer had the debt and it had been returned to their clients Legal direct recoverys, The origanal company is littlewoods extra. westcot returned my £1.00 cheque with this letter. Do I now re send my cca request to littlewoods or Legal direct recoverys who I was not aware were involved nor do I have an address for. and does the time span re set?. I know westcot had the debt and I was not told prior to this request for the cca that it had been forwarded to this Legal direct recoverys. Would be greatfull for any advice. I wonder if this is a delaying tactic or some other [problem]!

Go For It

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi welcome to the site.

Its not unusual for more than 1 dca to be involved in the collection of a debt,but Wescot are known to distance themselves if they get a CCA request and cannot comply through lack of paperwork.

I am not sure if these other people are the usual agents that deal with/for on behalf of Littlewoods.

If the debt has been sold then your issues with dealing with it will rest with the DCA,although theres nothing to stop you from sending Littlewoods an s10 notice asking them to refrain from further processing your data to third parties.

A check on your credit files should show who actually owns the debt now and who registered the default,together with the dates and any recent re-registering.

Each new owner has to re-register the default in their name.The 6 year limitation will kick in again if you acknowledge or admit liability.

Are you certain that its Legal direct recoveries and not Direct legal recoveries ?

Anyway I turned up this for you.

Legal Direct Recoveries

Sun Alliance House 35 Mosley Street , Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 1YF

Tel: 0870-263-1000

 

Send them the cca request.

You do not say as to whether you are challenging any issues with Littlewoods.....if you are then you can ask LDC to suspend any recovery action as the original account is in dispute.

I am moving your thread to Baliff and debt,as there may be others there who have had dealings with LDC and will be able to advise further.

Keep your thread updated.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a good idea to check your credit reference file - cost £2 each from the three companies - and to start making a fuss if this matter has been registered as a new default and not just switching the name of the owner. Some debt collectors are known to do this, it is illegal and they should be told to amned the record or face legal action for costs and damages if they don't. If this has happened in this, or any other case, the **** responsible should be reported to the Information Commissioner and their fitness to hold a data processing licence questioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...