Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It sounds as if they need better algorithms or another way to check. DWP algorithm wrongly flags 200,000 people for possible fraud and error | Housing benefit | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Two-thirds of housing benefit claims marked as high risk in last three years were legitimate, figures show  
    • I'm afraid that both yourself and we will need to see the claim form as a basic minimum. As this person has issued proceedings, we can't go any further at all without understanding the detail of what they are claiming on the basis of the claim. When you receive a claim form then you might normally respond within 14 days either with a defence or an acknowledgement of service. If you don't respond with either of these then the claimant can go ahead and obtain a judgement against you in default and that then becomes a bit tricky and also a bit expensive to overturn – called "a set-aside" If you don't file a defence but you supply an acknowledgement, then you get a further 14 days so up to 28 days to file a defence. I understand that you have had difficulties accessing the claim form. I'm afraid I don't know why that is not sure how much help we can give you on that. You're going to have to do this is a matter of urgency whatever the runs are rights of your position are. Once we understand the claim form, then we can advise you as to the next step and also we can put the claim in the context of your own story and decide how best to defend. I'm at a bit of the lost to give any more constructive advice at this point. Access to the claim form is essential. You could telephone the County Court business centre which I think is in Northampton. They have a helpline and maybe they can give you some solutions – but in the meantime, why can't you access the password reset? Have you checked your spam folder?
    • Thanks very much BankFodder, your help is invaluable and I will read through it more carefully this evening.  At this time I am not aware of any information I have left out. And thanks to jk2054, I realised after sending it about the third party rights, you are absolutely correct and I will proceed as standard BOC claim. I'll come back with any questions once I've had a thorough re-read and so I hope to get the letter emailed and posted early this week so I can start the 14 day clock. Thanks again, M
    • The original LOC is wrong. You are nothing to do with third party rights.   you placed the order on EVRi's website so there is no third party rights in it, its a standard BOC claim
    • nike pre provide the labels arguably here the easiest target is nike because they will give in very easily.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MFC The Sofa Store - New sofa + chairs not what expected - Refund possible?


Recommended Posts

Looking for advice if I can request a refund?

I purchased a new reclining sofa and two single chairs from a local sofa company.

I paid a £100 deposit a few weeks ago and the remaining balance when the goods were delivered which was yesterday, all of the payments were made with a debit credit card.

When the furniture arrived it was not as expected, the reclining mechanism is very poor and will not stay up when weight (i.e. your legs) is applied to the reclining rest . The material on the sofa is awful and is marked and looks like the furniture is second hand and not new.

Before I tackle the Sofa shop I would like to find out my legal rights and if I could request a return for a refund.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the name of the retailer please?

Did you buy the sofa online and was it made to measure or was it part of their catalogue?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

MFC The Sofa Store, Swansea.

The sofa wasn't an online purchase, purchased at the local store after viewing in the shop's showroom. The furniture was ordered through their catalogue because a different colour was required.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. 

In that case you have no automatic distancing statutory rights. We will have to look elsewhere. 

I suppose you have checked their policies in respect of returning items ?

If there is nothing there then you will have to rely on the item not being fit for purpose. 

This will probably be more complicated because I suppose that mfc will be unhelpful. 

However I would start off by making a detailed list of the way in which the items are defective.

Let us see the full list and incorporate the list into a letter which you will send to MFC as your introduction to the problem.

I'm afraid that it is likely that you will have to get some kind of inspection carried out to confirm what you say but if you can do that then your chances of success are very high.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you viewed it at the local showroom did you view the exact unit you got or was it just another of the same style?

underpaid paralegal

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Nicky Boy changed the title to New sofa and chairs from MFC The Sofa Store not what expected - Refund possible?

I have contacted the sofa shop who are sending someone out tomorrow to inspect the furniture.

I suspect if anything a replacement will be offered although I would prefer a refund.

Few photos of the wear in the material, this is how it was delivered.

pix.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to MFC The Sofa Store - New sofa + chairs not what expected - Refund possible?
6 hours ago, jk2054 said:

If you viewed it at the local showroom did you view the exact unit you got or was it just another of the same style?

 

1 hour ago, jk2054 said:

OP please asnwer the question I asked

 

8 hours ago, jazztheman said:

The furniture was ordered through their catalogue because a different colour was required.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So he ordered it through the catalogue but did he see it at the local showroom before it was delivered or not?

underpaid paralegal

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted.

but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

if it was ordered online through the catalouge tho it would be distanced surely since he never saw the product he purchased only a different variant?

 

he hasnt actually seen the thing hes buying...

Edited by jk2054

underpaid paralegal

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was ordered in the retailers store :crazy:

but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case...

the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I paid for the furniture with a visa debit card so not sure if this is the same consumer rights as a credit card?

The furniture is without a doubt unfit for purpose because of the reclining mechanism not working correctly.

I suspect that I may be offered either a repair, a replacement or a credit note (that's if they accept that there are problems with the furniture).

Do I have to accept a credit note or can I insist that I want a full refund?

Link to post
Share on other sites

redress via a debit card is a chargeback to your bank.

a credit card payment makes a bank jointly liable under section 75 of the CCA for any faults .

neither are linked to the Consumer Rights Act 2015 which you should invoke NOW in writing ONLY as the furniture is unfit for purpose.

Once you've reported this to them invoking your consumer rights within 30 days - the ONLY option for them is a FULLL REFUND.

you can however IF YOU WISH, accept a repair, though if that then fails for THE SAME reason(s), again you can then totally reject and demand a refund.

your call.

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...