Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It sounds as if they need better algorithms or another way to check. DWP algorithm wrongly flags 200,000 people for possible fraud and error | Housing benefit | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Two-thirds of housing benefit claims marked as high risk in last three years were legitimate, figures show  
    • I'm afraid that both yourself and we will need to see the claim form as a basic minimum. As this person has issued proceedings, we can't go any further at all without understanding the detail of what they are claiming on the basis of the claim. When you receive a claim form then you might normally respond within 14 days either with a defence or an acknowledgement of service. If you don't respond with either of these then the claimant can go ahead and obtain a judgement against you in default and that then becomes a bit tricky and also a bit expensive to overturn – called "a set-aside" If you don't file a defence but you supply an acknowledgement, then you get a further 14 days so up to 28 days to file a defence. I understand that you have had difficulties accessing the claim form. I'm afraid I don't know why that is not sure how much help we can give you on that. You're going to have to do this is a matter of urgency whatever the runs are rights of your position are. Once we understand the claim form, then we can advise you as to the next step and also we can put the claim in the context of your own story and decide how best to defend. I'm at a bit of the lost to give any more constructive advice at this point. Access to the claim form is essential. You could telephone the County Court business centre which I think is in Northampton. They have a helpline and maybe they can give you some solutions – but in the meantime, why can't you access the password reset? Have you checked your spam folder?
    • Thanks very much BankFodder, your help is invaluable and I will read through it more carefully this evening.  At this time I am not aware of any information I have left out. And thanks to jk2054, I realised after sending it about the third party rights, you are absolutely correct and I will proceed as standard BOC claim. I'll come back with any questions once I've had a thorough re-read and so I hope to get the letter emailed and posted early this week so I can start the 14 day clock. Thanks again, M
    • The original LOC is wrong. You are nothing to do with third party rights.   you placed the order on EVRi's website so there is no third party rights in it, its a standard BOC claim
    • nike pre provide the labels arguably here the easiest target is nike because they will give in very easily.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mis-sold full fibre by EE - not in our area yet - Openreach installed ducting dangerously near existing Water & Electrical services & now want me to pay £545!!

Recommended Posts

Please please help

we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22 

more details and pixs here


This is our hell with bt atm they seem like they are terminating us Making out we are asked to pay £545 We aren’t We hsve been treated shocking Miss...

Install couldn’t go ahead, no equipment sent and no installation survey carried out

it was hell 

found out that full fibre is not in road, we had to go back to cooper no choice

we involved Ceo and they put in contact with a man from customer resolutions who was was vile he told me I had to go to engineers 

something very odd about the ex resolutions

OpenReachBT took my drive up said they would put ducting in ready for full fibre

we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more

told to go to ombudsman 

then bill was £35

we called twice

told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks

later all sky package gets pulled

we call again

our bill goes to 165

the next two weeks was hell trying to get to bottom of why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone 341 mins was the call length

I got to the bottom of it, it  was this resolution man covering up for the others

issued another deadlock letter to cover it all up again

EE hid data and i couldn’t get the miss selling claim in writing I have now only from sept 

We tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has since sunk . 

The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and it needs to be taken up again apparently

the pipe sticks up in the middle of our drive near gate not behind it, it looks so odd, it’s as big as a drain pipe, open to water and it’s below and near touching the electrical cables to our hot tub .

I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work - I did not

it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mates in that team as the original install was not checked it had been done correctly 

I took to Twitter and posted on open reach

they ignored me

then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent an engineer

bt ignored me

ceo emails blocked

tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer

he wrote a report to say it’s dangerous

since then we have had a letter to say our problem can not be resolved 

then a email to say sorry we are leaving and now we can’t get into our account

Bt will not talk to us

Ofcom tells us nothing they can do

Citzens advice said go to the police 

we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky 

they make out we have cancelled we haven’t

we have this mess on our drive

dangerous work

we are in hell 

it’s like she covering up for this colleague

it’s all very odd

I am disabled

they like played mentalgames with me with me

open reach say bt resolved the issue - but no they have not 

I recon they have terminated us making out we have to hide it from mgt 

Help it’s hell

I don’t sleep

we have until 29 may

we have tried calling

they just ignore me 

at first they were so lovely as they say I am

then they go to manager and said we can’t say anything to you ...ended call 


police are rubbish

I need help even typing is so painful 


anyone hello be so grateful 



Link to post
Share on other sites

Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here.

Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well.

If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Mis-sold EE full fibre - BT ducting dangerously installed
  • dx100uk changed the title to Mis-sold full fibre by EE - not in our area yet - Openreach installed ducting dangerously near existing Water & Electrical services & now want me to pay £545!!

thread title updated

post one made easier to read understand. 

link to documents/pictures previously posted to our facebook page added.


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...