Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1 Date of the infringement 14th May 2024 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 14th May 2024 3 Date received 27th May 2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? APCOA Parking (UK) Ltd 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Hove Railway Station For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Unsure  Received this after payment failed to go through on the app. This has happened before and I don't really want to have to pay these parasites again. I have not appealed or had any contact since receiving this notice but the payment period runs out in a few days and wanted to know the best plan of action.  Many thanks! edited_Parking Ticket - Copy.pdf
    • One last query, the works have already been agreed to by ourselves as we have had no choice and should be completed today. So should this paragraph be requesting payment rather than asking from them to agree to commence works?    Also, we currently have a courtesy car provided by Mercedes which will be required back when we collect the car so I don’t think we’ll need to be requesting a courtesy car from Doves, unless they want the car back to review themselves? 
    • No HB, I dont think they are currently. Just different figureheads - and I'm not that sure about the second part. Half the Tory cabinet are hard right/poopulists and many of the Tory doners   Oh - and why are people talking about the 'extinction of the Tory party with 20% of the vote and 70-90 seats .. But the rise of the Reform party with a media driven 11% of the vote and - 4 seats being seen as an outside chance epic victory?   I'll bet if there were a kkk party in the UK it would do similarly to the reform core vote and split the hard right vote The Uk is very clanish - and consider themeselves tory or labour or whatever - although the extreme parties now do seem to be cracking that edifice somewhat - I hope
    • I'm not sure I follow, TJ. They're still with different parties, aren't they?
    • Well farage is just a Johnson number two isn't he .. (or johnson is a farage number two?) so you can understand their confusion   Has farage got a clacton home yet? Even an airBnB or a beach hut? No? No surprises there then eh?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Estate Agent CCJ for +£5k fees - Now Wilson & Roe HCEO's waving Arms about a Charging Order


Recommended Posts

ive got a ccj for a debt now at around 8k.

im now been threatened with a charging order on my property 

Ive read they have to apply for an interim order then a charging order and if needed they can aquire a order of sale.

the advice im looking for is how long from the interim order being applied for what is the time limit before it shows at the land registry?

also if they apply for a order of sale what happens if the property doesnt or takes ages to sell what can happen.

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the debt/ccj? And who is spoofing you please? 

Already have a thread? 

Is the property in joint names too and debt is just yours? 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the debt? 

Was the court claim defended.. Tell us more please.. 

And I bet the threat-o-gram doesn't say will anything

Scan it up to pdf please 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the debt is for estate agent fees which ive just ignored wrong i know.

ccj was issued they came to my home three times i want in so they left letters to state they had been.

im a bit worried about uploading docs,but the long and short of the letter states they have checked with land registry and found out i own the property and giving me one week to pay the debt or they will apply for a charging order,

i dont have the money to pay the debt

,but im concerned they may stop me from trying to sell the property or force me to sell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't force you to sell.. It's a threat-o-gram.. Stop panicking scan it read upload

4 minutes ago, marksheff said:

they came to my home three times i want in so they left letters to state they had been.

Who are 'they' 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope they are not a powerless DCA working for Wilson&Roe.

as the letter clearly states,

it's FROM Wilson&ROE whom are HCEO bailiffs operating to enforce a High Court Writ attained against you for a CCJ Judgement by their CLIENT, Sequence (UK) LTd (T/A William H Brown.)

from you posts it appears they have attended 'several times'? 

so i will guess you have previous letters like a Notice Of Enforcement' etc?? have you. 

and they have subsequently visited too, so i expect they've added ££10 to the debt figure quoted on the judgement for claimant you got..when was that?
 

if you read the bottom of their letter carefully it says: 

Quote

Should .you fail to contact us by this date with your proposals to settle this debt, we will advise the Claimant to apply to the court for a Charging Order against your property.

i can advise my dog to sit, if it does is a totally diff matter.

it's a threat-o-gram that doesn't say WILL anything. Hot Air

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so as above ans.

can you please answer my outstanding Q's there please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well thats not the same - its an intention to remove of goods notice 

all hot air - there no right of forced entry on consumer debt.

+£5k judgement wow those are some estate agent fees!!

did you defend the court claim or ignored everything inc the claimform and got a CCJ by default?

did you know about the court claim at all by the estate agent?

where's the Notice of enforcement from W+R?

thread title updated

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Estate Agent CCJ for +£5k fees - Now Wilson&Coe HCEO's waving Arms about a Charging Order

thats all the paper work ive received

3x removal of goods left by the enforcement officers and 1x which was posted which ive uploaded,

sorry if im not making sense.

i knew about the ccj but the rest ive just ignored.

i do appreciate you're responses, stuff like this goes straight over my head

,im not in a good place at the moment but not that im excusing my stupidity.

ive just found the notice of enforcement.

ill scan it and send it if you need to see it but bare with me as my internet is a bit slow..

Link to post
Share on other sites

no dont need to see the NOE, just that you did get one.

ok you knew about the CCJ,???

what do you mean please as this can be important.

did you receive the original claimform pack from northants bulk court regarding the estate agent making the court claim against you ?

did this come to your address where you are now or went elsewhere because you'd obviously moved?

or was it just a case of you ignored everything, inc the court claim but you say otherwise :

6 minutes ago, marksheff said:

i knew about the ccj but the rest ive just ignored.


dx

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok good that wraps things up nicely.

shame you didn't defend it. thus you lost and got a default judgement CCJ.

for a CCJ to be passed to the High Court thus to HCEO Bailiffs the default judgement CCJ must be >£600

then a writ is issued and the HCEO's try and enforce it with the resultant fees + interest etc that bumps up the sum owed.

as you've ignored them (good work😎) they will eventually try every trick in the book to try and make you engage with them.

ok sadly that means heaps of fees, but there you go.

theres no right of forced entry so poor ole bailiff.....

they will eventually pass it back to their client .

what you have is one of the latter now,  just trying to scam you for want of another word with idle threats.

you ought to deal with this at some point as if the claimant (estate agent) does go for and manage to get a CO, it WILL have to be paid upon sale of your home...eventually. 

if you have no intension of selling before you die, well thats for your executors to sort out in the future...:whistle:

though be 1000% confident, until then its extremely rare for an order of sale to be granted for such a small sum with regard the value of your home and p'haps other outstanding securities that might be against it like a mortgage or secured loans etc. your deeds will outline those.

if there are previous securities, then a 'newbie' like this lot, can't just come along and force you to sell, the others would be rather upset if they did try and probably object and then it will almost certainly 100% fail.

have a think about things , it might pay you to look toward putting an N245 variation to the court and offer a very low £PCM to the court, esp if you have little to no income etc like on benefits/pensioner etc...you might even get it all done for free as there is a small charge for the N245 process.

dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you so much for the help and advice it does mean a lot and youve put my mind at rest,ill take all the advice to heart.

ill definitely not engage with the bailiff.

m.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

update thread with the typo for hte name of the HCEO so people can search easier for their name if they have dealings with them in future?

Edited by jk2054

 I do not hold any legal qualification.

Nothing I say is meant as or should be taken as legal advice.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Estate Agent CCJ for +£5k fees - Now Wilson & Roe HCEO's waving Arms about a Charging Order

oh yea ta!

one last question

what date was the CCJ/Default judgement?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

blimey they moved quick.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...