Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with managing £90k+ debt


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I'm 24 years old and in a mess. I have set up a DMP with PayPlan on £800 per month.

Here are my personal debts - all in a DMP (which are still with the banks but will default anytime):

Barclaycard £1.3k

M&S £1.6k

Vanquis £970

NatWest card 1: £5.5k

NatWest card 2: £3.2k

NatWest loan £13.6k

NatWest OD £2079

New Day (Pulse, Fluid, Aqua) £3.5k, £2.9k, £3.3k

LTD debts with PG

Liberis £12.3k (defaulted with DCA)

Funding Circle £9k (nearly defaulted)

Capital on Tap (now Lowell) £9k

NatWest loan £5.8k (defaulted) - in DMP

Marketing company £19k 

No clue where to start. Ideally I want to pay the lot off as the LTD is still viable, just ruined by loan stacking. I have just been very bad with money since I turned 18 and some of these stacked up as a teenager/early 20s.

I heard a lot of DCAs offer discounts so is this the way to go? As there are a lot of creditors, it's going to be tough keeping in touch with them.

Many thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

90,000 at 24 years old is pretty spectacular debts.

I expect that my site team colleague @dx100uk will be along fairly soon.

In the meantime Do you own a house or any assets?

My first instinct is that if you have no assets then you should go bankrupt. There's no point in wasting the rest of your very useful life repaying companies who clearly must have been lending irresponsibly.
However, there is a quid pro quo on this which is that you learn your lesson and you don't go there again.

Let's see what my site team colleague says but I expect that he will agree that your DMP is simply calculated to keep the debts live for an awful long time and to get you paying through the nose for maybe the rest of your your life and never able to get rid of the burden and to start afresh.

This kind of debt at this kind of age is only going to corrupt your life – your family prospects – everything.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still living at home and pay housekeeping.

I sold my car already to pay some of the debt off and have no other assets really.

In the past year I paid around £30k off so the debt level was already much higher. When LTD revenue peaks I throw as much as I can at business related debts but Q1/Q2 is slow.

The marketing debt is what tipped me over the edge, I'm just wondering if I can negotiate a lower settlement amount with them then that's a start.

Another hope is that DCAs discount the debts heavily and I pay these on plans.

NatWest/NewDay have been chucking loans at me since I was 18.

Business loans were my fault for signing PGs - big regret of mine.

I'd be happy paying £20k off this year but it's been a slow start to the year.

And yes, I'll never borrow a single penny again - I was just immature. I quickly realised how dangerous borrowing is.

Edited by JHall2023
Link to post
Share on other sites

Start researching bankruptcy on the internet. It is the only sensible option for you.

Stop paying DCAs or anybody else. They are simply out to make profit out of you and to prolong the life of the debts.

Start researching bankruptcy. I am sure my site team colleague will be a long later or tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've researched already over the past few months - it's not for me. I need to continue LTD co for income and keep building the business.

The debts have sucked the life out of me and the company but the business model itself is viable. 

DCAs buy for as little as 10p in the £1 in most cases, why not just settle with them some time after default? I'd never be harassed again and no legal action required.

Marketing debt isn't even enforceable if I negotiate settlement fairly.

Surely there is a plan B...

Looking forward to hearing from the team tomorrow

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers debts or PG debts can only ever end in you getting a CCJ and if you lose it shows for 6yrs...then goes from your files.. regardless to being paid  or not paid or whatever, makes no odds it falls off. so lots of them wont hurt you, 1 is as bad a 10.

you've no assets like a residential property so they cant get charging orders.

and they cant get blood out of a stone.

same with default notices, the quicker you get every debt issued with a default notice the quicker it vanishes from your file and no longer harms you.

i would get every debt default by the original creditor issuing a default notice , then deal with each debt once thats happens.

i would get any income you get paid into a bank account that has no links with any of the lending 'groups' you are with.

that way you can totally control who gets what and when by transferring money out by bacs.

pers i would not go BK, esp if you wish to keep your business afloat no need.

drop that stupid DMP now and do one yourself, it's very very easy with a bit of paperwork organisation. a filr for each debt is a must

i scan everything then shred it. 

as for DCA's you are paying, if you've had a default notice from the original creditor and the debts been sold on via a notice of assignment - like your COT debt and lowells - stop paying them, follow the advice for that debt on each one.

seriously no-one can blood out of a stone and atleast you have a business that earning. 

dx

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice.
 

Most importantly I set up a new bank account with an unrelated banking group last summer when things were taking a dive.

Do you suggest I ignore everyone for now but keep any letters that come through?

I don’t even know if any except COT have gone to DCAs yet.

Requesting a SAR from COT - don’t see how it benefits me? Can’t I just ignore Lowell altogether? They haven’t even got the debt amount correct like I said the other day

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a Site Team member who should be commenting more, and someone who has been in precisely your situation, I can only echo DX100's sentiments.

Paying those debts are a hiding to nothing, and will make zero difference to your credit, and will only serve to put money in the pocket of the DMP.

Let them all default, pay nothing and in 6 years you will be clean, remember paying them even a penny resets the statute barred clock so just ignore their mountain of letters and threat' o grams , phonecalls etc.

Always open your mail though just in case it's a letter of claim, if that happens (and it might never) come here and we can help you bat them off. As for Lowell I have a lot of experience of them, I would say watchful waiting, counts for a lot, always open their letters,  look for anything that's been transferred to Overdales Solicitors, if they send a letter of Claim they are easy to kick to the kerb, as they are very speculative, often relying on people not responding in order to secure a judgement.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

lowell have purchased the cot debt. you have a notice of assignment.

please only comment on that debt on its thread that already exists.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be tempted to pay any discounted offers that come due to ignoring... I've got another bank account open for cheap settlements.

Potentially I could settle most of this for £15-25k? It's easier and based on my income increasing it'll be peanuts.

I can see my income improving over the next year so any discounts I'd be welcome to. If I can afford it at some point why not?

On a side note, I'd like a mortgage before 30, I suspect I'd need a VERY high deposit and pay higher interest (if anyone even considers me in the first place with all these defaults).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm following this thread with interest as I'm in a similar position. However I'm literally DOUBLE your age, mate! Nearly 50!

This isn't my first rodeo with debt, unfortunately. I just wanted to wish you all the best JHall2023 going forward and to add to what a lot of other posters have said here - 24yrs old is no age to be saddled with a humungus 90k debt - it will change the whole course of your life. You have everything in front of you.

Can you not "phoenix" the LTD company, signing the new one over to a sibling or partner, making them sole director? Then you can go personally BK.

6 years may seem like a long time at 24, but believe me it goes in a flash and you'll still be under 30 to get a second chance, with lessons learned.

The only thing I'd add is, personally I would pay any small suppliers or individuals who will lose out with the winding up of existing LTD.

The big banks and loan companies will just write it down as tax-deductable loss on a spreadsheet somewhere. Give a ****!!! 

Best wishes.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Xerzes thanks for the heads up. I would never go BK, it would ruin everything and my reputation - I prefer dx advice above which is more of a strategy.

I'd rather just let these defaults fall off and move on. I'm sure I had a default when I was 18 which doesn't even show anymore, it can't be that bad (I never used to check my file back then).

Unfortunately no one would become director (family etc) they're not savvy enough to understand how business works or the potential risks involved - they've only ever worked in jobs.

Cheers

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, JHall2023 said:

I'd be tempted to pay any discounted offers that come due to ignoring... I've got another bank account open for cheap settlements.

Potentially I could settle most of this for £15-25k? It's easier and based on my income increasing it'll be peanuts.

I can see my income improving over the next year so any discounts I'd be welcome to. If I can afford it at some point why not?

On a side note, I'd like a mortgage before 30, I suspect I'd need a VERY high deposit and pay higher interest (if anyone even considers me in the first place with all these defaults).

On the side note, by the time you are 30 all of this would have disappeared whether you pay or not, which is why you would be bonkers to even consider paying a penny. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand. What's the likelihood of a CCJ? Not going to end up with 10 CCJs or (how ever many there are) am I? That would be a lot of stress and faffing about responding to letters.

Can't be bothered doing anything in writing I just want to move on. I'll keep the letters sorted in a folder and that's it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a waiting game, remember they have 6 years, I had more debts with more creditors , at more value than you, and I ended up with 4, but that's before I found this place, then I wouldn't have any because they are easy to bat away mostly, with very little writing. I could explain why this is, but just take my word for it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok sounds good. Grateful for this forum. 

I'm expecting a lot of letters but hopefully they become less frequent if I ignore - right?

I'm just focusing on my future and increasing income, paying into a safe bank account. Will store away each letter as mentioned

Link to post
Share on other sites

None of this is worth worrying about, the letters will come in fits and starts, the only one you need to worry about is a letter of claim, that may or may not come at some point

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DCA's , the wording, everything is designed to make it sound like this is the most important thing in the world.  In reality all that the likes of Lowell do is purchase thousands of debts for 10p in the £, and their mission is to use any means to sound like they are actually a court or a bailiff to scare you into paying. In reality nothing could be further from the truth.

The reason why the debt is so cheap is because they are mostly fatally flawed and won't stand up to any scrutiny. That's why the Original Creditors don't take you to court and crush you, it's better for them to take a massive loss and sell to the likes of Lowell,

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, London1971 said:

 In reality all that the likes of Lowell do is purchase thousands of debts for 10p in the £,

That's why the Original Creditors don't take you to court and crush you

And thats after they have claimed tax relief against the loss, bad debt, so they are winner winner chicken dinner.:-D

 

 

.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, JHall2023 said:

@Xerzes thanks for the heads up. I would never go BK, it would ruin everything and my reputation - I prefer dx advice above which is more of a strategy.

I'd rather just let these defaults fall off and move on. I'm sure I had a default when I was 18 which doesn't even show anymore, it can't be that bad (I never used to check my file back then).

Unfortunately no one would become director (family etc) they're not savvy enough to understand how business works or the potential risks involved - they've only ever worked in jobs.

Cheers

 

 

Yep, totally understood. - ;) 

 

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've still got my own thread which no-one has answered. I don't want to sound like a neg-head, but I don't think it's as simple as some posters here would wish.

Hopefully, I'm wrong, in which case I'd appreciate a response to my own thread.

Anyway, all the best fella. At 24 the world is yours. Don't worry about debt, set yourself free.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just remember the golden rules here.

stop paying , get the original creditors to issue a default notice and register the default on your credit file ASAP.

that way on the DN's 6th B'day, the whole account VANISHES and no-one bar you and the debt owner knows about it's existence, so mortgages are not off the cards once things begin to fall off. again does mean the debt is not owed, 

if you go for a mortgage never ever ever give brokers or IFA's access to your view of your credit file.

let them look themselves and they see nothing bad.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...