Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just wondering if someone can offer some advice. Before I knew about this forum I ended up with a CCJ. I agreed a payment of X per month with the Court and it was agreed and that payment has been kept up to date, except for a period last year from Sep to Dec whereby I was held on suspicion of a crime in Norway (later acquitted I might add) but for 3 months and as such had no way of maintaining the payments each month with no access to be able to make the transfers to these parasitic wasps. When I returned, I paid the 3 months I was behind and have since continued to maintain the payments that was agreed by the Court originally. I have never received any notification or demand from the Court regarding the period I was unable to pay and haven't to date. However, I received this below by email today - not sure how they got my email but perhaps from this original debt as the Original creditor may have passed it on to them. Any thoughts on this please? "The County Court Judgment (CCJ) granted on 11-2018 remains unpaid therefore our client is considering enforcement action. Despite sending you previous reminders, you have failed to engage with us and set up an affordable payment plan for £2444.21 which means our client could instruct us to take further action in the next 14 days. If our client instructs us to apply for a Warrant of Control, a County Court Bailiff could visit you at home to discuss payment of the outstanding balance. Alternatively, our client may instruct us to enforce by way of a Charging Order which will result in the Court securing the outstanding debt against any beneficial interest you hold in a property. This means our client will recover the debt when you come to sell or remortgage your property. Our client may also request an Attachment of Earnings which will result in the Court ordering your employer to deduct payment directly from your wages. In order to avoid this, you must either make a one-off payment of £2444.21 or set up a payment plan with us within 14 days."  
    • Actually you making me go back and double check the Arnold Clark thing rang a bell and the trust took all the payments off my wages. 2 months £111 & 2 months at £115. Im fairly sure that means its paid off?
    • nothing to be scared about at sll... what are you scared over ... lets get that out the window then p'haps we can be given some logical answers as this is all mad. who is the owner on the cars v5c document?..have you got a copy of it? when someone get's a pcn, it will go to the registered keeper of the car, (as whomever issued the pcn will log a reg number, then ask the dvla whom is said person on their database for a fee)  if the RK are a lease company, the lease company should inform the pcn sender of the details of the named HIRER.  the pcn issuers then must reset everything and write a new pcn to the stated hirer including a copy of the relevant hire agreement. if the hirer was not the driver, then they should write back to the pcn issuer stating who the driver at the time of the PCN was. the PCN issuer should then reset everything again and sent a new pcn to the named driver. thats how things work by LAW. if someone in one of the stages has messed up then any pcn is void. lets just assume that the nhs trust is the hirer, the nhs trust just cant payt any pcn they get whereby they know the driver was you and then dock it from your wages!! thats THEFT!! any PCN is solely a matter between whomever was the DRIVER and the PCN issuer, NOTHING to do with any hire company who should be transparent. nothing to do with your employer the hiree, they should be transparent.  now if the pcn issurer has written to the DRIVER and they fail to pay a PCN , eventually the registered keeper ONLY could be held responsible. but that doesnt fit any of your PCN's esp this one!! neither should pay anything to anyone not doc your wages nor add admin fees. again something is not right here. dx   nothing to do with    
    • Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss will become co-owners in the ninth-tier club.View the full article
    • yes send a letter explaining your business losses as a result of the NFU error and say that you want to avoid taking this to Court, therefore hope that a settlement can be negotiated.  Send as much information as you can to evidence the loss and how these have been calculated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MET/DCBL ANPR PCN Claimform - no other paperwork i moved! - overstay - (346) Southgate Park, Stansted. CM24 IPY


Recommended Posts

PCN Sticky

1. Date of the infringement Allegedly 02 January 2020.

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] No idea, never received PCN letter.

3 Date received Never received. The letters of debt collecting - first at 18.01.2023

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No idea, never received PCN letter.

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? No idea, never received PCN letter.

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No appeal. Never received the PCN letter.

7 Who is the parking company? MET Parking Services

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Southgate Park, Stansted CM24 1PY

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA Logo at bottom of letter.

 

Court Sticky:

Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil national business centre, Northampton NN12LH

Name of the Claimant :     MET Parking Services Ltd       

Claimants Solicitors: DCB legal Ltd

Date of issue – 21/11/2023

Date for AOS - 10/12/2023

Date to submit Defence - 24/12/2023

What is the claim for .

1.The defendant (D)is indebted to the claimant (C)for a parking charge issued to vehicle LE**G** at (346) Southgate Park, Stansted, CM24 1PY.

2.The PCN were issued on  02/01/2020.

3.The defendant is pursued as the driver of the vehicle for breach pf the terms on the signs (the contract). Reason: Overstay.

4.In the alternative the defendant is pursued as the keeper pursuant to POFA 2012, Schedule 4.

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

1. £170 being the total of the PCN(s) and damages.

2. Interest rate of 8% per annum pursuant to s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 from the date hereof at a daily rate of £.01 until judgement or sooner payment.

3. Costs and court fees.

What is the value of the claim? £170

Amount Claimed £225.60

court fees £35

legal rep fees £50

Total Amount £310.60

Have you moved since the issuance of the PCN?  Yes

Did you receive a letter of Claim With A reply Pack wanting I&E etc about 1mth before the claimform?  No

Hi All,

Sure this won't come as a surprise to you all, but another victim of the shoddy MET Parking Services and the ridiculous parking scenario at the Starbucks/McDonalds parking area near Stansted Airport.

New story - I read a lot of yours but I have not seen one as mine.

I bought myself a house end of December 2021, and this January I got a Debt Recovery Notice about an alleged infraction on 02 January 2020, the vehicle mentioned I was the keeper at the time and the vehicle itself has been scrapped on the 29 November 2020.

I tried to call the number but there was no customer service, only call-to-pay line. Also the letter stated I cannot dispute the charge and next time to dispute it will be in court I thought it is a scam and ignored it until last week I got the Claim Form for County Court.

Thanks,

Worazz

 

 

2023-04-04 DCBl letter + Claimform.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Nicky Boy changed the title to MET Parking Services - Southgate Park, Stansted - Claim Form
  • dx100uk changed the title to MET/DCBL ANPR PCN Claimform - Southgate Park, Stansted

thread title updated

pdf's sorted (name was still showing!)

everything now in post 1.

....................................

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform

.register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.

Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...

You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
then log in to the MCOL Website

.select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.then using the details required from the claimform

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim

type your name ONLY

no need to sign anything

.you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to MET/DCBL ANPR PCN Claimform no other paperwork i moved! - overstay Southgate Park, Stansted

look further down in the court Q&A sticky but dont file yet run the 33 days.

best you use those days till read read read and read more on PCN claimform threads here.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, if you do a search on the forum you will see we have a lot of threads for this place.  It's basically a scam site.

Yours is only the second case we've seen in years & years where they've done court though, undoubtedly because you'd moved and you didn't reply to a Letter of Claim.

When you wrote "printed and sent" you did mean the CPR request, right?

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Dave, yes I have been reading a lot, but as you already mentioned mine is court one for some reason.

Yes, the CPR request - printed and sent after completing the AOS online, as per dx's instructions.

 

And yeah the full timeline had me scrapping the vehicle and moving to new place in between the date of alleged contravention and receiving first "debt recovery" letters. To none of them did I respond as all of them said that I cannot dispute the charge as seen in the letter attached.

02/01/2020 - alleged contravention

29/11/2020 - scrappage of mentioned vehicle that I was still the registered keeper of and V5 had my address of the time on it since DVLA was reaching me and they had my details from them it should be correct

02/02/2022 - I move to my new place

18/01/2023 - first letter of debt recovery to my new address

21/11/2023 - letter of claim raised to county court

Funny enough I never used that parking, since I didn't see the pictures (the PCN or any reminder was never sent to my address in the first place, on the 18/01/2023 it was literally the first contact)

I cannot even take a look whether it was my housemate as he sometimes borrowed my car, but then again I checked my emails and everything and on 01/01/2020 I was flying into the country back from holiday and was landing at Luton London Airport so me myself definitely had no business in Stansted area.

I cannot even check for mercy period, whether that was actually my car or reg clone, nothing, as I never had that letter in my hands, sadly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry, this is a scam site and has been exposed as such on national television.  We're here to help you fight this.

Please come back on the forum when your defence is due and we can assess what to do depending on whether MET reply to the CPR request or not.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to MET/DCBL ANPR PCN Claimform no other paperwork i moved! - overstay - Southgate Park, Stansted

PCN Sticky update - I have received copies today

1. Date of the infringement 02 January 2020

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 08 January 2020 generated, never received, technically.

3 Date received Never received. The letters of debt collecting - first at 18.01.2023

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No.

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes, CCTV and ANPR, but it's literally just plates and lights of the vehicle.

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No appeal. Never received the PCN letter, because the car was registered to my old address.

7 Who is the parking company? MET Parking Services

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Southgate Park, Stansted CM24 1PY

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA Logo at bottom of letter.

...........................

my defence needs to be posted by this Sunday, the 24th of December 2023.

I did receive a package today from dcb legal, please see the contents attached.

Apart from all those below, there is a lot of photos of their signs and their location on site and copy of their contract with the landowners with redacted information they found irrelevant. I can add those if needed.

Now in terms of the address on the PCN letter

- it is the place I used to live for a year after I bought the car, but I moved in Sept 2019, 4 months before the alleged contravention.

I phoned DVLA looking to get information for which address the car was registered to at the time, and the call centre gave me information that the car is not only registered to my address two places back (the one I lived at before 04/09/2019) but also I am still registered keeper of this SORNed vehicle, they never got the info about scrappage.

Guess this is what I got for sending V5C after moving via post, especially since I only noticed I don't have it when I was sending it for scrap, but scrap guys said they don't need it, so I was not too fussed, never would have thought I didn't have a copy,

I went through all of my documents and it is not there, because I sent mine out and it was lost in the post, and I do not have any proof of postage, as this is just V5C address change, and also that apparently scrap guys don't let DVLA know that they are scrapping a vehicle.

And the photos from CCTV and ANPR look like my plates, the shape of lights seem like my car as well, but no idea who was the driver at the time and if this is actually my car, as I mentioned before I flew in to Luton airport on 01.01.2020 in the evening after sleeping off a New Year's party abroad, not a chance it was me at Stansted on the 02.01.2020 at 05:42AM.

First and foremost since the defence submit date is on the weekend I need to upload it before 4pm tomorrow (Friday, the 22nd of December 2023).

Second

if I prove that I have moved before as I have an email of change to the address of the car for car insurance policy, I think I could get my address history in terms of DVLA for my driving license, and my rent agreement and stuff, as much as my V5C was lost in post, would that prove it that the letters could not be delivered as neither myself nor the car lived at the address that was there with DVLA and would tank the case straight away?

Thanks to that I know the exact date of moving - it was 18/10/2019 - that is when I moved away from the address the letters went to and changes all of my banks, insurance, driving license and V5C. As mentioned, all was well and apparently my V5C sent off with change of address never made it.

Unfortunately road tax emails don't have my address, so they cannot show that I moved.

I also spoke to my housemate of the time - it is highly probable he was driving his guests from the States who came round for New Year's using my car and it would make sense that it made an appearance at Stansted in early morning hours on the 2nd when I was sound asleep.

I finished taking photos of the rest of the package that came in today.

The last few pages that are photos of the contract they came in such great quality I believe just to make it harder for any Defendants.

I will be with you guys in the morning, drafting the defence, sorry I came back only tonight just as the deadline draws within less than a day, I was occupied with my divorce case, quite more costly than this one.

No idea when those photos were taken, 2020 or now.

 

DCBL CPR Return inc full contract with T&Cs.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 06/12/2023 at 18:48, dx100uk said:

look further down in the court Q&A sticky but dont file yet run the 33 days.

dx

check a few Southgate Park, Stansted claimform threads to make sure its the same one.

they dont state the reason for the speculative invoice in the POC, but i suspect as usual it will be 'occupants left carpark'

obv they'll have to produce all their paperwork in their witness statement (months away if at all) and you might get a copy of the PCN via your CPR, but as this is a moved address thread, i'm wondering if an sar to MET might be worthy?

IMHO yes.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx,

But 33 days is on 24th of December, the POC was issued on 21st of November , 33 days run this Sunday, so I need to post my defence by 4pm today, Friday (22nd), right?

The PCN states overstay, so does the POC.

I got copies of PCN via CPR, please see the attachments in #14 and #15 (maybe a merge there as well, sorry - the time limit on edit is very short)

I will read on SAR, but can I throw it in on the same day I post my defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to MET/DCBL ANPR PCN Claimform - no other paperwork i moved! - overstay - (346) Southgate Park, Stansted. CM24 IPY

yes sorry my browser was having a hissy fit and i didnt see the uploads. ive merged them for you too.

so no need for SAR.

yes defence due 4 pm today.

interesting they've inc more of the contract than we've ever seen before inc the full T&C's

@FTMDave 

On 08/12/2023 at 13:04, FTMDave said:

Don't worry, this is a scam site and has been exposed as such on national television.  We're here to help you fight this.

Please come back on the forum when your defence is due and we can assess what to do depending on whether MET reply to the CPR request or not.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I checked my moving date, the processing times for V5C change, etc.

I moved on the 18 October 2019, which is 10 weeks prior to the alleged contravention date, I changed my car policy, my Road Tax Direct Debit details, sent off my driving license and V5C via post,  DVLA reserves 6 weeks before starting any proceedings in case V5C gets lost in post,

this gives me another 4 weeks in which I have to start getting a new copy, before I can change the address using the new V5C, which can arrive from them in any time between days to weeks, which again can take up to 6 weeks after I send it off with new address, the online service to change the address only became available in June 2020, I had no other way to do that than send it off by post.

I believe this would be me completing my due diligence and removes my fault from them receiving wrong address for the PCN on the date of alleged contravention. Also the debt collectors got my correct address 3 years later without any problems apparently.

At the same time the contract they sent over has different post code (CM24 1AA) and name for the parking then the one on POC (CM24 1PY) and google returns two different sites around the airport

reading into the forum, I know to be as generic as possible, I took the template and commented on it, please see below:

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle]. 

Yep, turns out I still am, after the phonecall, and because my V5C that I sent was lost it is still registered to my old address, even though the DVLA on reg query will return that the vehicle no longer exists, because it was scrapped on 29 November 2020… can I change is to 'was at the date of alleged contravention'?

 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant.

I did not, it is perfectly possible that my housemate was there - could I transfer it to him now :D :D 

3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 

They did provide the contract so this doesn’t stand, does it?

 4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.

I did not, as I was not the one to enter that contract in the first place

 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 

That is true, the amount on debt recovery letters and following is £170, and not £100, or the ‘offer’ of £60.

 6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.

I was reading into the contract and apart from different site name, different post code, the letter they attach 'Landowner authority' which proceeds to mention they are redacting some information for commercial sensitivity they also state and I quote:

As can be seen from the extract from the contract held with Tabacon Stansted 2 Ltd this agreement has commencement date of 1 November 2013 [...]

You turn to the next page and there is scan of the contract says commencement of 01/11/2013 but the signing on it is 03/09/2014, loose 10 months later.

Also the paragraphs for nature and scope of services, commencement and duration and enforcement activities of the contract on a separate page with entirely different font than the contract don't have a date on them, definitely from a different contract,

at the same time those paragraphs are doubled and are different in wording than respective paragraphs of T&Cs which are dated 2009 so belong to a different contract - also T&Cs only show Client, never naming the client,

this is definitely from a different contract as it was drawn 5 years prior to signing of the one about 'Starbucks Carpark, Stansted Amenity Area, A120, Stansted Airport, CM24 1AA' and not '(346) Southgate Park, Stansted CM24 1PY'

the front page is definitely from some kind of contract regarding the site that might be the site in question, but the rest is loosely thrown in, possibly not even relevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're overthinking this.

They are suing you at an address you live at for an invoice connected to a vehicle you used to be the registered keeper of.  That is legit.

The contract is heavily redacted and you haven't a clue what bits they have hidden so the para about the contract can stay in.

Just file the bland defence as is.

Later at Witness Statement stage you will have ample chance to flesh these arguments out and go into as much detail as you want.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

the V5C issues are totally irrelevant, forget that totally.

just copy and paste the generic defence in to MCOL defence section. 

job done.

you should get an email/letter acking its filing.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all of this until now, I guess the real show might start in 2024, right?

Should the claim be in any way shape or form dismissed I will let you know here and I am definitely putting down support for the site, but in the new year as mentioned above I have some tough financial dealings at the moment.

No email, the letter will come in it's due time I guess, but the site shows it all processed:

Your acknowledgment of service was received on 06/ 12/ 2023 at 16:05: 11
Your defence was submitted on 22/ 12/ 2023 at 12:20:31
Your defence was received on 22/ 12/2023 at at :05:33

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read this short thread you will see all the stage of the court procedure and will be able to see what comes next  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406892-highview-parking-anpr-pcn-claimform-urban-exchange-manchester-claim-dismissed/#comments

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey Dave,

This came through mail today - attachment.

Small Claims Track application copy and the letter I took a photo of.

Do I call them for doodoo and giggles?

they might want to settle for them paying me 30 quid for all the printing and postage I did?

I mean most likely nothing will happen, but should I explore the option?

I might tell you guys what I hear over there and so for any future caggers it will be of help?

 

2023-12-29 DCB(L) client going ahead..pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

std letter always sent to intimidate & harass

ignore

keep an eye on mcol claim history for mention of DQ's N180 being sent out.

if that doesnt happen in 2mts from defence filing date, its safe to assume the claim is autostayed and going no-where unless they then pay upto £275 to lift the stay 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...