Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

K Davies v HSBC ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6331 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, this is my first post since I joined the site and fired off my system access request asking HSBC for copy statements covering the last six years, this was done by email and I was unable to include the £10 fee which I said would be paid at my branch in cash. I received an acknowledgement from the bank stating that they would waive the charge on this occasion and they duly sent me all the statements requested. It took some time to wade through these statements and I duly logged all the charges and interest onto the spreadsheets dowloaded from the site and on 31st July 06 took these, along with the preliminary letter asking for return of charges, to my local branch where the manager faxed acopy to the relevant department. My claim was for £4,020.50 in charges levied plus £1,046.00 interest, making a total of £5,066.50.

 

I received no response to this letter and enclosures during the next two weeks and on 16th August 06, I took a letter before action and further copies of my spreadsheets to the bank, asking them to fax these documents as before.

 

On 18th August 06, I received a letter dated 15th August and postmarked 16-08-06, which stated that the bank did not agree with my contention that the charges imposed by them were unlawful and therefore unenforceable. The letter went on to say that the contract between the bank and its customer is governed by HSBC's standard terms and conditions, pointing out the relevant clauses therein and stating that a copy of the terms and conditions and a copy of the latest price list were enclosed for my information, - these items were not enclosed.

 

I have contacted my local branch in an attempt to speak to the writer of this letter and they have sent messages to the relevant department asking them to contact me, as although I believe the writer to be based in Sheffield (15 miles from my home) as per the address at the foot of the letter, the post mark states that it was posted from Swansea, and the contact telephone number given connected me to Manila, who then connected me to a call centre in Leeds (40 miles from me) when, 30 seconds into my conversation we were cut off! It now seems inevitable that I shall have to persue my claim through the courts and I have advised the manager of my local branch that unless I receive contact from a senior representative of the bank by close of business today, I will enter into litigation against them without further correspondence.

 

I would be grateful for any help or suggestions you or any other members can give and will gladly share any information or experience with others.

 

Let's get our money back!!!

Happy Bank Crunching,

Keith Davis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

File the court claim, they won't pay up without it.

Have a read round the HSBC forum and see how they handle other claims.

Good luck :)

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

issue a claim via the courts, it is pretty straightforward, i am currently claiming against both hcbc an capital one, having been transparent with both companies, and have tried every avenue to come to agreement, i believe if my claim/s do, go to court the judge will look upon them unfavourably, as they have not conducted themselves in a proper and decent manner, :)

hsbc

Claim served on 13-08-2006

 

full refund .19-08-2006,

23-08-06 cheque arrived £580-deal.:D

 

capital one .

Filed claim against 16-08-2006 for £340.

Capital one 02-09-06 offer £383 refund to account.deal:D

 

Abbey Data Protection Act 4-07-06

 

issued court claim for £189 16-10-06

waitng for allocation nov21-11-06:cool:

 

 

Pleae make a donation to site, when you win-- I DID

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

K.Davis v HSBC. Won £4800.00 - Without the need for litigation!

 

I eventually received an offer of £2000.00 from the bank, who stressed that, whilst not admitting liability, they were mindful of irrecoverable costs and management time associated with such claims. I telephoned the customer services team at Millshaw Park, Leeds and asked to speak to Colin Langdale as the writer of this letter. I was informed that he was on annual leave and spoke to one of his colleagues who was adamant that the banks position remained unchanged. I then sent further correspondence headed 'without prejudice' by email, stating that I was prepared to voluntarily reduce my claim to £5000.00 in order to use the small claims track, pointing out that with court costs and 8% interest added this would result in a claim against them of in excess of £5,750.00. Howevever, I also stated that I would settle immediately for the sum of £4800.00.

 

At this time I also had several ongoing issues and complaints against the bank, mostly service issues, which had not been resolved. I threatened the 'Quality Service' team with the ombudsman and letters to their chairman, Mr Geoghan and head of customer service team, David Lewis, as well as letters to the national press, FSA and Banking Standards Code Board as well as CAG if a senior manager did not contact me within 24 hours to settle these complaints. I was delighted when I was contacted by Mrs Heidi Daniels, who not only listened to what I had to say, but negotiated with the Leeds office who initially offered me the sum of £4300.00, which represented the refund of charges only, not the interest. I rejected this offer stating that I would settle for the sum of £4800.00 as stated in my email. Mrs Daniels then informed them of this and although they fought against it, got agreement from the bank. Further to this she resolved the other issues, refunded other charges and paid a further £250.00 compensation, whilst renegotiating a new overdrat facility for me, what a result! I have nothing but praise for this Lady, sadly as I mentoned to her, too many of her colleagues are 'Idiots' of the highest order!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Keith. It is frustrating i know, that when you call, you get a youngster on the phone,and has to keep asking their supervisor for information on what answers to give you. You did well there as most people have to go through the court route. Enjoy your refund.

 

Merry Christmas to you and your family.

 

Ukaviator

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

hI moved your posts from welcome to here, and ammended title.

Start a new thread for your other claim in "other institutions "

Congratulations once again:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...