Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, I has the pleasure this morning of receiving the attached NTK from "MET Parking Services Ltd" regarding the now infamous Starbucks car park near Stansted Airport. Obviously it is not compliant with Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 as it was sent more than 14 days after the alleged contravention.  I have seen on various other forums that people have been successfully appealing these via POPLA (https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6507793/challanging-parking-ticket-issed-by-med-parking-in-stansted-mcdonalds-starbucks-southgate-park) -- is this worth doing or should I just ignore and keep an eye out for any subsequent letter of claim?   Date of the infringement 02/03/2024 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 09/04/2024  Date received 12/04/2024 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A - not appealed Who is the parking company? MET Parking Services Where exactly [carpark name and town] (346) Southgate Park, Stansted, CM24 1PY For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA/POPLA Thank you in advance for your help. Met Parking Services NTK 09-04-2024.pdf
    • Just wondering if someone can offer some advice. Before I knew about this forum I ended up with a CCJ. I agreed a payment of X per month with the Court and it was agreed and that payment has been kept up to date, except for a period last year from Sep to Dec whereby I was held on suspicion of a crime in Norway (later acquitted I might add) but for 3 months and as such had no way of maintaining the payments each month with no access to be able to make the transfers to these parasitic wasps. When I returned, I paid the 3 months I was behind and have since continued to maintain the payments that was agreed by the Court originally. I have never received any notification or demand from the Court regarding the period I was unable to pay and haven't to date. However, I received this below by email today - not sure how they got my email but perhaps from this original debt as the Original creditor may have passed it on to them. Any thoughts on this please? "The County Court Judgment (CCJ) granted on 11-2018 remains unpaid therefore our client is considering enforcement action. Despite sending you previous reminders, you have failed to engage with us and set up an affordable payment plan for £2444.21 which means our client could instruct us to take further action in the next 14 days. If our client instructs us to apply for a Warrant of Control, a County Court Bailiff could visit you at home to discuss payment of the outstanding balance. Alternatively, our client may instruct us to enforce by way of a Charging Order which will result in the Court securing the outstanding debt against any beneficial interest you hold in a property. This means our client will recover the debt when you come to sell or remortgage your property. Our client may also request an Attachment of Earnings which will result in the Court ordering your employer to deduct payment directly from your wages. In order to avoid this, you must either make a one-off payment of £2444.21 or set up a payment plan with us within 14 days."  
    • Actually you making me go back and double check the Arnold Clark thing rang a bell and the trust took all the payments off my wages. 2 months £111 & 2 months at £115. Im fairly sure that means its paid off?
    • nothing to be scared about at sll... what are you scared over ... lets get that out the window then p'haps we can be given some logical answers as this is all mad. who is the owner on the cars v5c document?..have you got a copy of it? when someone get's a pcn, it will go to the registered keeper of the car, (as whomever issued the pcn will log a reg number, then ask the dvla whom is said person on their database for a fee)  if the RK are a lease company, the lease company should inform the pcn sender of the details of the named HIRER.  the pcn issuers then must reset everything and write a new pcn to the stated hirer including a copy of the relevant hire agreement. if the hirer was not the driver, then they should write back to the pcn issuer stating who the driver at the time of the PCN was. the PCN issuer should then reset everything again and sent a new pcn to the named driver. thats how things work by LAW. if someone in one of the stages has messed up then any pcn is void. lets just assume that the nhs trust is the hirer, the nhs trust just cant payt any pcn they get whereby they know the driver was you and then dock it from your wages!! thats THEFT!! any PCN is solely a matter between whomever was the DRIVER and the PCN issuer, NOTHING to do with any hire company who should be transparent. nothing to do with your employer the hiree, they should be transparent.  now if the pcn issurer has written to the DRIVER and they fail to pay a PCN , eventually the registered keeper ONLY could be held responsible. but that doesnt fit any of your PCN's esp this one!! neither should pay anything to anyone not doc your wages nor add admin fees. again something is not right here. dx   nothing to do with    
    • Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss will become co-owners in the ninth-tier club.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MET ANPR 2019 PCN Claimform - Occupants left Car Park - Southgate Park, Stansted Airport ***Claim Struck Out***


Recommended Posts

Apologies for starting what appears to be yet another thread about this infamous joke of a car park, but after receiving the usual "invoice" from MET Parking Services over FOUR YEARS ago, they've now finally sent a Claim Form!  I've had a look through a few of the threads but couldn't see any advice on what to do now they've finally taken it to this stage.

The claim is now for the original amount plus interest at 8% for the four years, plus court and legal fees.

As it's so long since this happened, I'll do my best to summarise what happened:

  • Parked 5 spaces in to the "Starbucks car park" and walked across to McDonalds - 18th July 2019
  • Received the penalty notice dated 2nd September 2019 - 46 days later so I'm sure that's outside of the usual period!
  • Did look to appeal but their shoddy appeals website wasn't secure so attempted to call them - only number to call them is the payment line!
  • I think I finally spoke to someone and they said to appeal in writing - it was 2019, they use state of the art technology but can't pay £30 for an SSL certificate - no thanks!
  • Have continued to receive various threatening letters from no less than 3 collection agencies (Debt Recovery Plus, Zenith Collections, CST Law)
  • Zenith Collections offered reduced amount with 'Notice of Intention to Commence Legal Proceedings' back in Jan 2020 
  • CST Law sent letter before claim in February 2021
  • I sent them a data protection request for the photos etc after receiving this and had a response from the CEO and 'Executive Assitant' - mentioned about the 14 days but said I'd have to speak to Debt Recovery Plus
  • Received the SAR along with the photos which were no longer available on the website at this point

Any suggestions on best next steps, I've got 14 days now to respond as I received this on Thursday and it looks like you get 5 days from the date of issue before the 14 days start.  Happy to fight this and go to court, if they have the balls to...

Let me know what information you need to assist, I have all the letters still from them and their various collection agencies.

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

What response did you have to the SAR

When did you send it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Forum and well done on checking through relevant threads.

Not sure why they have picked on you to take to Court.

You have either written something to them that has singled you out as not being knowledgeable enough about the private parking laws or you have just annoyed them🙂.

To help us help you could you please fill in the questions on the form below-

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, please fill in the sticky.

Fellow Site Team member dx100uk will be on shortly with details of how to open a MCOL account and start to defend the claim.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They provided the information very quickly actually, just over an hour, my details and all the photos they had. 

I responded highlighting the issues contacting them previously and the lack of a secure appeals portal. 

Also asked them why they continued to chase me despite issuing the invoice well outside the 14 days,

received a PDF letter the next day just saying I'd taken the decision not to appeal so had to take it up with the collection agency.  This was back in Feb 2021.

Thanks, will get that detail over to you in the morning! 

I suspect as I actually did speak to them and gone via the DPO@ address that I've annoyed them

i.e. actually found a way to get them to answer correspondence and not hide behind website query forms!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The PCN being delivered late only means that they cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper after the first 28 days. So you as keeper cannot be liable for the PCN only the driver is now responsible . As the driver could be anyone  who has a valid motor insurance policy  is able to drive your car and Court do not accept that the keeper and the driver  are the same person. so they will have their work cut out.

Good for you for annoying them. Very shortly you will be sending them a snotty letter which will not endear you to them either. But it's nothing personal, it's designed to show them that you are not scared of them or going to court.  [Ok I lied, it is personal].

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to MET ANPR 2019 PCN Claimform - Southgate Park, Stansted Airport

It sounds like you've had a fair amount of correspondence with them.

So, have you "outed" yourself as the driver at any point?

Be nice to see all the comms between you.

Please upload anything you have.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, full details below of the claim, have also scanned a redacted copy less the references and my personal data.

Which Court have you received the claim from ? MCOL Northampton

Name of the Claimant :  MET Parking Services Ltd

Claimants Solicitors: DCB Legal

Date of issue – 23rd October 2023

Date for AOS - 10th November 2023

Date to submit Defence - 24th November 2023

What is the claim for  

1. The Defendant (D) is indebted to the Claimant (C) for a Parking Charge(s) issued to vehicle xxx at (346) Southgate Park, Stansted, CM24 1PY.

2. The PCN details are 18/07/2019, xxxx

3. The PCN(s) was issued on private land owned or managed by C.  The vehicle was parked in breach of the Terms and Cs signs (the Contract), thus incurring the PCN(s).

4. The driver agreed to pay within 28 days but did not.  D is liable as the driver or keeper.  Despite requests, the PCN(s) is outstanding.  The Contract entitles C to damages.

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS

1. £170 being the total of the PCN(s) and damages.

2. Interest at a rate of 8% per annum pursuant to s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 from the date hereof at a daily rate of £0.01 until judgement or sooner payment.

3. Costs and court fees. 

What is the value of the claim?

Amount Claimed £231.04

Court fees £35.00 

Legal rep fees £50.00 

Total Amount £316.04

Have you moved since the issuance of the PCN? Yes, moved in November 2020

Did you receive a letter of Claim With A reply Pack wanting I&E etc about 1mth before the claimform? No, I don't recall receiving one recently.  Just found some more letters from Direct Collection Bailliffs Ltd (DCBL) from December 2022 - January 2023.  These were notice of debt recovery, final reminder, final notice and notice of intended legal action.  Nothing received since then.

ClamForm_Redacted.pdf

I think I've had the initial letter plus two chasers from them,

then 4 different recovery agencies, all of which have sent a 'notice of legal proceedings' letter before it going quiet then another agency sending letters months or even years later!

The only correspondence I've really had with them was the emails mentioned above plus maybe one phone call when some lad in the payment department actually answered the phone. 

I've confirmed my registration and the PCN reference but never admitted it was me in writing.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

dcb legal, a solicitor, are the ones that might have  sent a letter of claim.

in the fullness of time we will need you to scan everything in/out, by whatever method of comms, bothsides of every letter, to one mass date ordered pdf please.

phone calls do not count.

so std procedure going fwd:

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform

.

register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.


Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...


You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 

then log in to the MCOL Website

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim


type your name ONLY


no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

………….
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write to the court pointing out that Met parking have not specified whether you are being pursued as the keeper or the driver.

As the Court does not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person and that the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 states that if the keeper does not divulge the name of the driver within 28 days of receiving the PCN then it is the keeper who becomes liable to pay for the breach.

Would the Court please confirm therefore that Met Parking should be pursuing me as the keeper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Concentrate on doing AOS and CPR as dx has explained.

Then come back here and we can look at getting evidence to scupper MET.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done.

If you want to save a few bob send the letter 2nd class and get a free Certificate of Posting, that is quite sufficient as proof of postage.

We don't need to see the reminder letters, especially from the various powerless DCAs, but what is important is
   - the original PCN
   - the reply to the SAR
   - anything you wrote to them
   - if they sent you Latter of Claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

So sorry for the delay, I completely forgot about this for a while!  If I calculated the dates correctly I need to submit my response by Friday so massive apologies this is very short notice!

I did send the letter to DCB Legal and received a bunch of documentation back yesterday.  I've now scanned in all the various letters and redacted them all (before re-reading your comment above that this was not needed).  I've attached redacted copies of the following as per your last message:

  • Original SAR
  • Letter before claim from CST Law - this was the only letter I ever received from them and was the third agency I'd received letters from (Debt Recovery Plus / Zenith Collections before, DCBL after)
  • MET parkings response to my SAR
  • My response to their email

I assume I now submit my defence through the MCOL website?

 

docs1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 30/10/2023 at 09:28, TravellingTechy said:

Date to submit Defence - 24th November 2023

the defence you'll be filing is already in the sticky further down from where you completed the above from.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick responses.  I've read through the sticky and the related link and drafted the following:
 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

1. The Defendant was the recorded keeper of [xxx] on the date in question.

2. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.  

3. It is denied that the Defendant breached any terms and conditions set on private land.

4. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant, or broke any such contract.

5. It is unreasonable for the Claimant to delay litigation for over four years and to claim more than four years' interest.

6. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.

Is that sufficient for now?

Edited by FTMDave
Extra info added
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've added an extra point in red to the defence.  File it when you want.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 21/11/2023 at 23:26, TravellingTechy said:

Great, thanks, I wasn't sure how much detail to put in at this stage.  Defence submitted, thanks for all your help.

Hello Travelling Techy.

How are things going with this Court Claim? I am in the same situation with Met parking and was sent a Court Claim recently by dcb. My 14 days are up on soon and keen to know what you got in reply.

I will defend this as well.

 

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been a few claim forms since, almost all sent to people who ignored the Letter of Claim.

But yes, please start your own thread, everyone's circumstances are different.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep a weekly watch on MCOL claim history for mention of DQ N180's being sent out IF they wish to progress it and not let it get autostayed.

but be aware we know that just last week CNBC were only just processing paperwork for 4th oct!

so dont start cheering for at least 8 weeks....or more.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...