Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Kuick Car Hire Ltd: https://www.kuickcar.co.uk/   Kuick Care Hire Ltd 3 Osborn Gardens Mill Hill London NW7 1DY   Previous Names: Shama Syal Ltd   Company Number: 09106051   Director: Alexander Syal  (Appointed 27th June 2014)   Incorporated: 27th June 2014   Company Type: Private Limited Company (PLC)   Status: Active   Companies House Link: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09106051   Endole link: https://suite.endole.co.uk/insight/company/09106051-kuick-car-hire-ltd   I agree that you need to send them a Subject Access Request (SAR) this is important as they have already passed your details to the police when the police contacted them about who hired that specific vehicle. They have 30 Days to comply and that time only starts once they have acknowledged your SAR Request.   There Privacy Policy on their website is sadly lacking: https://www.kuickcar.co.uk/index.php/privacy-policy/ It fails to give there ICO Registration number and as they are dealing with Personal Data of individual Hirers they should be registered with the ICO and have a specific registration number which I cannot find on their website nor on the ICO Register.   You need to request from them (not by phone) but in writing what their Information Commissioners Office (ICO) Registration Number is as they are dealing with Personal Data.
    • Generally regarding the default judgement....lets clear up a few things.     that does not matter at all..'they' the fleecers, do NOT send the claimform.   the fact the OP returned 'whatever' letter(s) from the fleecers makes no odds whatsoever to why nor can have any bearing upon, the sending or not of a claimform by northants bulk to the advised address.   the claimant or their acting solicitors make a request to northants bulk court to issue the claim. telling someone that you don't live there does not allow the court to dispense with issuing one, no matter what the claimant says. it must happen.    now how do we deal with this one... the OP has confirmed northants bulk sent the initial claimform to the correct address, where it went is now not the problem.   the problem is as LFI correctly pointed out is a time limit now applies to what you do ..28 cal days+5 for service , so call it 30...the options are:   i. pay £257 within that timescale and it has zero effects going forward. this is the only way to ensure it is totally closed and erased. ii. let that time expire and live with the multitude of other issues it will have, as well as possible enforcement, bailiffs are explained above, there are also others enforcement options, but we've never seen them used in a Speculative invoice judgement to date. iii. set aside - cost £255 - no guarantee of success.   more on set aside.... there typically 2 criteria that need to be met to raise a set aside  1. a beyond reasonable doubt cause that explains why the defendant did not physically get the claimform i'e the claimant sent it to an old address when the correct address was already notified in writing prior to it's issuance or an admin error by the court etc etc. ignorance, by the defendant in doing the above if moved or of the actual form is ...not such.   2. a basic defence as to why the defendant does not owe the sum explained by the claimforms particulars of claim.   as it stands... 1, we are already sadly on dodgy ground..we don't know, neither will the judge, where it's gone, it's service address has proved correct, it's not what happened agreed..but for all the judge would know .. the defendant could have simply ignored it. a big hurdle without answer....wheres that claimform?..   2. a basic defence, there is probably more worth in arguing the claimed sum contains for want of a differing term 'unicorn food tax' sums which are not allowed, thus the claimed sum is wrong... than going down the route of ...the invoice was issued in an area that is governed by xxxx, in that i mean, byelaws, road traffic laws etc etc..those are all 'paperwork' issues and are somewhat trumped by the default judgement, much like no signed credit agreement exists, in consumer debt default judgements.   my musings   the choice is the op's...the deadline is 28th....              
    • Thank you for the replies all.   Yes March 2020, apologies for that error.   I can take it or leave it with the membership, plenty of other spots around. If it means burning bridges to get what is owed, then so be it.   However, also happy to pay for membership when I have used it. I have stated this in an e-mail to their management. Fair's fair, however their refusal to refund OR transfer over extra payments from one franchise to another is not.   Particularly as they operate as one fitness group, with a centralised payment system, website, same branding, and the ability to access any site, worldwide! 
    • No apology necessary   If you had to work from home at all due to Covid, you can claim the extra tax allowance.   Follow the link posted above in post #2 and it takes you through the process.   Please update to let us know if you get your tax code updated for this.
    • Smaller and more powerful lenses promise to bring even better smartphone cameras. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 32 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

wycombemariner V Yorkshire bank ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 769 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just put in my 2nd AQ. I was advised by the court staff that as i had already paid the fee when submitting the first questionairre, that i do not have to pay the fee when submitting the second one.

 

Can anyone confirm this as the guy i spoke to was about 17 years old and didn't seem to sure? I don't want to mess up my case by not paying a relevant fee?

Up The Mariners

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I've just put in my 2nd AQ. I was advised by the court staff that as i had already paid the fee when submitting the first questionairre, that i do not have to pay the fee when submitting the second one.

 

Can anyone confirm this as the guy i spoke to was about 17 years old and didn't seem to sure? I don't want to mess up my case by not paying a relevant fee?

 

 

Why have you submitted 2?

 

 

 

 

 

I am not a legal expert my advice is given without prejudice and is purely my opinion only. If you are in doubt please seek professional advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that's right Wycombemariner. My stay has ended too and I am about to submit my second AQ. The court have told me that I won't need to pay for it.

 

The order for the stay instructs you to do this if the matter is not resolved after the stay has ended livelylad.

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Cheers Caro - would seem that as soon as the judge sets a court date i should get a letter offering settlement! Fingers crossed

 

I like your optimism!

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Caro.:D

 

 

 

 

 

I am not a legal expert my advice is given without prejudice and is purely my opinion only. If you are in doubt please seek professional advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

NO THEY ARE TAKING THE MICKEY!!!

 

I have had a similar offer twice with thinly veiled threats of costs and no guarantee the court will award interest. No there are no guarantees, but it's a small claim so there will be no costs, and I see no reason that the court would not give you statutory interest. They are just continuing to intimidate you so that they can say they had the last word. I refused my offer twice, and suggest that you do the same, although you must do what is right for you.

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 6 months later...

I believe that this case was settled out of court. See this thread... Urgent Advice Needed I'm sure wycombemariner will be able to confirm this and then this could have the title changed and be moved to the success forum.

 

Can I be the first to say congratulations wycombemariner :D Oh and is your branch in Wycombe? I noticed a comment you made about the manager not liking you because of you complaining lol. Sounds like the Wycombe branch manager :rolleyes:

 

Sarah.

Yorkshire Bank

Started Process 19th Sept 2006.

All Stages Followed.

Next Step Court!

Hearing Date 7th June 2007.

WON!!!!! 6th June 2007 :D

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Example Step-By-Step Instructions

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can confirm success and the thread needs moving.

 

The branch manager has now left, she was a total nightmare, and wouldn't know what "customer Service skills" were if they ran up and smacked her in the face!

 

A person that used to work in my branch has now retured and is helping the new manager - both of these people are fantastic. They have even put my accounts on "waive" which means their computers automatically ignore my accounts and don't put any charges on to them.

Up The Mariners

Link to post
Share on other sites

Result matey. I wondered what happened to you as our claims were running at the same time.

 

I love the account being on "waive". Good stuff lol

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 11 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Up The Mariners

Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 769 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...