Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • depends what the fees are, typically nothing can be added once judgement is passed bar litigation costs. on document retention time limits etc at least 6yrs previous must be held though many hold complete info. as for acronyms and abbreviations ideally yes they should     
    • Still have to submit a statement either system....if they fail they can only give verbal because they failed to file and serve.
    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please help-Natwest Mortgage For Natwest Advantage Gold


juanito12
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6170 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

having reached the end of my 2 year fix mortgage deal, I have now taken a new 2 yr fixed at 5.19% through Natwest, according to the Natwest website

http://www.natwest.com/personal02c.a...S/REMORTGAGING

advantage gold customer taking a new mortgage or remortgaging would benefit from £150 cashback, I did not realise this when they originally took me through the process but having investigated it, realised that I am eligible and since the new mortgage does not become effective 'till 05/01/07, I decided to call them to request the cashback. The mortage dpt have now referred me to the quality assurance team. I have faxed them I am awaiting to hear further. Any suggestions on the steps to follow should they refuse to honour the payment??

thanks - JJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

True, the reason for remaining with Natwest is the fact that I have had to take a lower paid job following redundancy in a company for which I worked 10 years, This limited my options and rather than having to go through a new lender, it was easier to renew with Natwest, hence, avoiding all the scrutiny and the likelihood of being turned down. My other option was to go into the variable rate, that would have taken the payments up by £80.:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a helpful member of staff so if the mortagage has gone through then i can save you about 288 quid is just 3 seconds. Change the ADGD back to a current plus, the home loan is a separate agreement, £12 a month would be better spent on you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a helpful member of staff so if the mortagage has gone through then i can save you about 288 quid is just 3 seconds. Change the ADGD back to a current plus, the home loan is a separate agreement, £12 a month would be better spent on you.

Hi

 

Thanks for the advice, I was under the impression that ADGD has other benefits such as the ID THEFT, free Mobile Insurance, etc. Also, when you say that the home loan is a separate agreement, that does mean that I do not qualify for the £150, the website does state otherwise!!! Sorry, I am new to all this but trying desperately to learn fast :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advantage Gold does have additional benefits IF you use them, IF you do then it is a good package to have, IF you don;t then it is costing YOU money that would be better spent elsewhere. I have to say I haven;t seen the offer on the website but when do you get the cashback? When you do then that is when YOU should see how many of the benefits YOU will use and how much money it is saving you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I supposed is like any other policies, sometimes is peace of mind, If I lost my mobile which by the way is already registered and worth more than I could afford to replace it, then I would use it. As to the link that states the £150 cashback, here it is: http://www.natwest.com/personal02c.a...S/REMORTGAGING

please correct me if I am reading it wrongly. Thanks again for your help:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I was an Advantage Gold account holder at Nat. West. but once someone pointed out to me that I was paying monthly fee to carry a gold card I changed to a standard account. I used to receive various leaflets as to all the facilities I could use as a AG account holder but never did take anything. It was therefore better for me to come out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...