Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Myjar IRL complaint refused - now ACI chasing me.


Recommended Posts

Thank you for your help

Yes for some reason it would not allow me to update that thread. I assumed it's been archive?

Link to post
Share on other sites

block and bounce their emails!!

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a little more context i'd like to share but in the current climate I'm wary of sharing it on a public forum would it be ok if I DM you?

I've no issue with it being shared with people who have commented from the site team?

I've been chewing over it for months and months

Link to post
Share on other sites

PM advice is not allowed as it helps no-one bar YOU...not what CAG is about.

if we operated that way they'd be no threads to read here.

post to your thread here.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Massive apologies. That makes absolute sense, and I should have considered that first. I am sorry.

I had wanted to provide a copy of the case file which I had sent to myjar. I am really sorry.

I understand your point, the issue I have is that because I suffer from bipolar I took out a load of payday loans, I tried going through resolver and asked that they consider writing off the loan this was in 2020.

I had previously changed my name, and Myjar responded to me in my new name. The change was both my first name and second name. The document I sent listed the information there.

Despite this, every communication I have received from them has been in my former names. I requested they read the first page of the document, which literally listed my details and answers to their questions.

They refused to do so, so I told them to go ahead and bring me to court.

Interestingly they have now contacted me about another loan with a separate company which is unrelated to this but uses the information that I supplied in the case file.

Given that they would not act upon the information supplied in the case file, would this stand in a court of law (in which case the debt is not statute barred)?

If this information, which they would not act on, is not relevant, then it would be. They also called me for the first time yesterday under my newer number and old name. They asked if I knew anyone who called (my former name). I said no and put the phone down.

I had previously gone to (The financial ombudsman) but been told that due to Myjar failing they could not help.

I'm not sure where I stand, I'm sorry for rambling and for not thinking in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said at least once already .....the name change is immaterial, forget it.

until of unless you get a letter of claim by surface mail you ignore everything.

block and bounce all emails, txts and never answer the phone.

move on.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...