Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I've got a parking ticket, see here... https://ibb.co/DfHqg9F https://ibb.co/QvqH52m https://ibb.co/pbPPdDg https://ibb.co/X2F1X25 I've been parking at a particular corner in a small Tesco car park for years. Recently they put two electric charging plugs, one where that spot is and one at the bay next door, so I stopped using them out of courtesy in case they need to be used (I use that Tesco every day and drive past every day but have yet to see anyone use them). Recently I went back to Tesco when it was reasonably dark. All the bays were full, including the three blue badge bays. I have one but none of the cars parked in the bays did, I noticed as I walked past them (nobody ever gets pulled for that because Tesco have never policed this small car park before). Since there was two free electric bay spaces, and since I wasn't going to be long (just one product), I parked into my former 'regular' spot. There was a notice on the wall but if I'm honest I didn't read it because (a) I'm thick, and (b) I honestly thought it was just telling people how to use the device (like I said, I'm thick) rather than this being a parking fine. I went back during daylight and the sign is very obvious (as you can see from the picture), although not so obvious at night, although probably still obvious enough for you to tell me "tough luck, pal". Now they want £100 or £60 if I pay quickly. Am I doomed?
    • Hi All   After a bit of advice to see where I stand. Bought a car in Sept 2022 on pcp. Been told it had a big inspection and was good to go. Had many issues with it throughout the year including trims coming off the car and sunroof not closing.   While getting the sunroof repaired at month 12, in Sept 2023, the bodyshop guy said your cars been in a bad accident. Garage said it hasn't but offered to take the car back at half of what I paid for it as long as I buy a replacement from them before inspecting it (probably damage control) (car was £78k, said they'd offer £40k "trade in value" as if doing me a favour).   Ended up getting a forensic inspection done for £2400 in Dec 2023, confirmed car was in a bad smash (write off level but unrecorded on hpi) and potentially unsafe to drive - front end is slightly bent towards 1 side, what looks like a hairline crack on the chasis, overspray, bonner with patches of filler all over it, damaged rubbers etc   Raised complaint to finance company and few weeks ago to FOS... just wondering what people's experiences have been like going through the FOS, main thing that concerns me is that it was 12-13 months after I bought the car that I realised what caused these issues and raised the issue to the garage/ finance co but the damage/ misaligned panels are actually visible in the advert photos which I saved thankfully.    Dealership has had my car for 4 weeks to let a few bodyshops look at it (without giving me a courtesy car!!!) Not giving me any updates either because I went to the FOS about it and didnt want to speak to them over the phone anymore as opposed to emails. Note: hanging trim was reported within 3 months but due to part delays it didn't come until like July 2023, within 2 months the piece came off again, claimed under repairers warranty for another replacement 6 weeks ago and within 2 weeks this time the trim is coming off AGAIN (assuming it won't stay on due to the car being actually bent out of shape slightly)   Any idea if I have a good case or if there's anything else I can do?   Thanks
    • After the dealer failed to refund the money I checked the sort code and account number to reveal which bank received the money. It turned out to be HSBC BUSINESS DIRECT ONLINE. I called them and they confirmed the account name wasn’t Langley Cars though obviously didn’t tell me the correct account name. My bank contacted HSBC after I reported this to be fraud and they did in fact do a charge back but reversed the decision when the dealer sent a copy of the receipt he gave me for the deposit where it said it was non-refundable. I said that doesn’t mean anything when the car should never have been put on the forecourt when it was a death trap, and not fit for purpose.   The MOT revealed only a few of the faults which he agreed to correct in a week as I needed the car to travel out of London for work. He didn’t meet that deadline either because there were other more serious problems as identified by my independent car check. The same mechanic informed the dealer of these faults. The car wasn’t fixed by the agreed date due to the extensive repairs needed. So he was in breach of our contract on many levels.    I requested the bank find out the correct name of the account and they said the only information they had was like you said was the account number and sort code. I challenged the bank stating that whenever I create a new payee if the name doesn’t match the registered account name, it declines the creation of the proposed payee. So what happened in this instance?    I checked company’s house using the address from where the dealership is located and there was neither the two names, one was aa advertised in AUTOTRADER and the other on the courtyards entrance. I thought as I had made payment to the dealers ‘Trading as’ name that it would more than likely be enforceable than any other. Indeed the Bailiff was the one to call me and say that a variation of the warrant of control needed to be done before he could go and enforce the order. I cross-checked the address on Companies House website and got 3 different business names. Only one appears to be car related.  I am unsure as to what I can do within the variation of the warrant which the bailiff felt was appropriate. I will speak to him again Monday. 
    • Their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. iit was not posted until 13 days after the event for one thing meaning it would be deemed to arrive on the 15th day instead of the 14th day. Now though we cannot expect that your PCN also missed the deadline there were still two other things wrong with the wording of the PCN that if your PCN has the same wording as your friends means that your PCN would not be compliant either. Their PCN does not specify the period of parking as required n the Act. It does show the ANPR arrival and departure dates but as those times include driving from the entrance to finding a parking place then later driving from the parking place to the exit cannot be described as a parking period. I suspect that the " Important Note" on your form will also not comply though I cannot be sure until we see your actual PCN.The reason I can't confirm that is because they sent out the PCN too late they have said that they are pursuing your friend on the assumption that they were the driver as well as the keeper-something that Courts do not accept. But it does look as if your PCN is not compliant which means that the keeper cannot be held liable to pay the charge. Only the driver can be made to pay it. If you have not appealed and revealed who was driving, there is no way that  Excel know who was driving.  So just to be sure please send them an SAR . On another topic do you have any proof that you did not stay there for so long just to really spoil Excel's day.
    • As your first PCN was a Notice to Driver which would have been followed by a Notice to keeper over a month later [even though it may only state Parking Charge notice] it is even more necessary to send PE an SAR. If either document fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act  2012 Schedule 4 then both you and your father are in the clear. So you do not need to worry about is any paperwork from unregulated debt collectors and fifth rate solicitors. The only thing to look out for is a Letter of Claim and all you have to do is respond with a snotty letter back to them .  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell, old TSB/lloyd joint loan with my ex , maiden name too! it's a 25 year debt being chased.!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 140 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a letter from Lowell today for a 4 grand debt I had no knowledge of in my ex married name. 

I havnt used that name for over 20 years. 

Trying to get any information out of them was like pulling teeth, but they stated information from when the debt accrued, which seemed accurate.

However all debts were paid off when the sale of the house went through, so I thought. 

To cut a long story short, it was an amount of about 2 grand that was outstanding, from a loan, which should have been covered via insurance due to ill health, but wasn't. In 1997. 

After the divorce and sale of the house in about 2002, I had, so I thought, no debt. 

However unbeknown to me, and my ex holds his hands up to this, he was in court for this debt and made an offer to pay, my name was not on the papers for this. 

He has paid a nominal amount, without fail, every month for the last 15 plus years. 

Lowell took over the account last month, and a month was missed due to a mix up on Lowells behalf by not informing clients of the takeover, so a payment was missed. However, despite the payment being paid and sorted on the phone with lowell by my ex husband, lowell still decideds to chase me for the full amount owed, despite the fact the debt wasn't in my name and its being paid monthly. 

Now, can they chase me for this debt after all this time, despite the fact that this debt isn't even in my name and its being paid. Its not even on my credit score and now worried it will be added because lowell has added me to this debt. 

I've asked for an investigation.

Im wondering if they are now chasing me because they're only getting a nominal amount from my ex husband,  and think they will get more from me. Can they do that after all this time, especially as I was told all debts were paid for via the sale of the marital home. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, seanamarts said:

.....despite the fact that this debt isn't even in my name....

Just on that point, changing your name for any reason  - whether because of marriage, divorce, deed poll, or just choosing to use a new name - makes no difference to whether you are liable to repay a debt.  The debt is incurred by you the person and changing your name doesn't change that.  If it were that easy people would be queuing up all over the country to change their name  by deed poll to wipe out their debts!

There may be many reasons here why the debt cannot be recovered from you, but your change of name isn't one of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

was the debt joint?

and were you both taken to court? ie named on the claimforms(s) / judgement?

you cant be responsible for a debt if no judgement was gained against YOU, regardless to if a judgement was gained against your ex.

and anyway. id tell him to stop paying

lowells have boughtout Hoist UK, so i suspect it was them that got the CCJ in the 1st place.

there not really a lot they can do after all this time if he just stops paying

they'd have to return to court to enforce via bailiffs from the court

of that he'd be told, then he can question the enforceability of the debt cause a bet they dont have any paperwork

its a consumer credit debt, no bailiff has any right of forced entry on CCA debt. 

they eventually go away

stop paying.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 13/07/2023 at 15:26, Ethel Street said:

 

There may be many reasons here why the debt cannot be recovered from you, but your change of name isn't one of them.

And I stated that where? 

Did you read my post? 

On 13/07/2023 at 15:36, dx100uk said:

was the debt joint?

and were you both taken to court? ie named on the claimforms(s) / judgement?

you cant be responsible for a debt if no judgement was gained against YOU, regardless to if a judgement was gained against your ex.

The loan would have been joint, the court papers were solely in his name. 

I had no judgement against me. In my married name or my maiden name, which I use now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, seanamarts said:

my name was not on the papers for this. 

if this is true you owe nowt.

tell him to stop paying too deargirl

nice to see you around..

 

dx

 

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 13/07/2023 at 15:50, dx100uk said:

if this is true you owe nowt.

tell him to stop paying too deargirl

nice to see you around..

dx

 

Haha, I couldn't tell him what to do when we were married, no chance of telling him what to do now lol. 

Good to see you're still here DX, hope all is well with you. 

Ex has assured me my name was not on any claim forms from the court. 

On 13/07/2023 at 15:52, Ethel Street said:

Of course I read your post! You said it here, that the debt was in your previous married name.

And? 

That wasn't my point!

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, seanamarts said:

The loan would have been joint, the court papers were solely in his name. 

I had no judgement against me. In my married name or my maiden name, which I use now. 

Then legally you are still liable hence the chase...joint and several.....irrelevant that only your ex was named on the court claim/judgment.... 

Safe to ignore though given that a court claim was issued so long ago very unlikely proceeding would be issued in your name or that it could affect your credit files.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loan was in joint names as the bank account was in joint names. As was the mortgage. After we were married I was added.

My point here is, can they chase me for a debt that is almost 30 years old. 

The debt was a little over 2 grand, it went to court because the loan was disputed because they wouldn't honour the insurance claim made against the loan due to illness. That was being disputed well after the divorce, which I was led to believe that all debts etc had been paid off.

I had no knowledge the debt had even gone to court. 

The bank was TSB. 

I don't even know who took on the debt and took it to court. But I know I wasn't on any judgement.

Court costs were added, so would I be liable for those that have been added to this debt as well?

The original loan was £3000

The debt was a little over £2000,

With the court costs added, it ended up over £5000.

Just over £4200 is now owed, despite my ex paying every month for the past almost 20 years. 

It just seems wrong that if the debt is being paid regularly for all that time, lowell takes over and decides to now chase me for it as well.  

It's just shocking to see this after 20 years of thinking that all the debts with regards to the marriage were paid off. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Ethel Street said:

It was one of your points and I quoted it and responded to it in Post #2.  That's the purpose of the forum. You post, other people respond. There's no need to be so ungrateful when people offer help.

You came across incredibly patronising, and not helpful at all. 

My name change was not the issues here and certainly wasn't trying to not pay a debt that i would have been liable for, but as stated, i was on the understanding that ALL debts were paid from the sale of the house. 

 

My point was, could they still chase me for the debt if it was being paid. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is shocking but that's the nature of a DCA and why they have a bad reputation. Your ex is paying so is fulfilling the judgment they are just trying their luck chasing you as joint debtor...ignore.

 

 

.

  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two separate matters here.  The loan and the court case.  You need to separate them in your mind.

1.  Regarding the loan, it was joint, so yes, you are liable.

2.  The court case.  The fleecers could have sued you, or your ex, or both of you, but chose to sue your ex.  So you have no connection to the court judgement in any way, either the core amount or costs.  You are completely in the clear.  Nothing to do with you.

Going back to (1), you may in theory be liable but as dx and Andy wrote, in reality Lowell are trying it on and are unlikely to actually do anything.

  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. 

I've requested all documentation on the matter, I've a feeling it won't be sent. 

I shall keep you updated. 

Just seen confirmation from the ex hubby, that a settlement agreement with lowell, was made on the the 3rd of last month, solely in his name.

If they've already made an agreement with him, can they still actively chase me for it. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andys post no #10 regarding joint debt applies.  

If your ex has made continual payments since the original CCJ and has a new agreement to continue, then if the ex stopped paying, they can chase you.  But issuing any Court claim against you does seem doubtful. 

Did you ever enter into any legal agreements as part of the divorce process through Courts in regards to debts shared with your ex ? Any insolvency process either yourself or your ex ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 13/07/2023 at 19:50, unclebulgaria67 said:

Did you ever enter into any legal agreements as part of the divorce process through Courts in regards to debts shared with your ex ? Any insolvency process either yourself or your ex ?

No, it was a straightforward divorce, very amicable, I vaguely remember signing something about an agreement that all debts must be paid before I had a payment from the sale of the house. This debt should have been included. 

Trouble is it should never have been a debt as it was covered by insurance if one of us became ill and couldn't work.  I had 3 strokes which prevented me going back to work, but they never honoured it, it was disputed, but I really can't remember what happened to it. 

It was such a long time ago and I don't have any paperwork from that time anymore, didn't think I would need it. 

I've definitely not had any ccjs in my name so I know I was never chased for this debt. 

From what I can understand it was taken over twice before it went to lowell, the ex has paid every month without fail, when lowell took it over a payment wasn't paid as no one informed the ex that lowell had taken over. But all this was sorted on the 3rd of last month and a new agreement was done and all payments were caught up.

They started chasing me a week ago. I got the letter today. So 5 weeks after an agreement was made with the ex, they decided to chase me as well.  I had no idea that there was a debt still as stated, all money owing was meant to have been paid from the sale of the house. I was too unwell to deal with it, plus I wasn't the mortgage holder, I was just named on there due to being married. 

Just seems ridiculous to be honest. 

I just think because only a nominal amount is being paid  they're coming after me to get it paid off quicker. 

If they do pursue it via the courts, it would be less than my ex is paying so they wouldn't gain much. 

But surely I wouldn't be responsible for the court fees ect if I wasn't on the judgement. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, seanamarts said:

My point here is, can they chase me for a debt that is almost 30 years old.

they can chase you and ask for payment

you can equally ignore them.

they have no hold on you.. no.

however, and im not quite sure on your 'logic' that 

6 hours ago, seanamarts said:

After we were married I was added.

to be added to a mortgage and the loan, each would have to have been done separately and YOU would have had to have signed at least one form for the mortgage and one for the loan. they cant just add your name!!. click.

but if they did..them wheres the signed agreement with YOUR sig on it lowells....go try another mug..you met @seanamarts from CAG.

6 hours ago, seanamarts said:

Just seen confirmation from the ex hubby, that a settlement agreement with lowell, was made on the the 3rd of last month, solely in his name.

If they've already made an agreement with him, can they still actively chase me for it. 

so they are being very cheeky here too...how strange for a dca.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My apologies for not being clearer, apparently I wasn't added to the mortgage after we were married. As for the loan, this was taken out after we were married. 

To be honest I don't remember much about it, I suffered a massive stroke about a year or so after, and my memory was affected, amongst other things, there was no issue paying it at that time as we were both working. I couldn't work after the stroke, that's when the insurance should have kicked in but the insurance company refused to honour it. 

The ex had to cut his hours to help look after me and the children. 

It was just incredibly unfortunate. 

We were both quite young. You just don't expect to suffer a stroke in your early 30s. 

It wasn't long after this that we sold the house and went our separate ways. I'm still not really sure why this debt wasn't paid out of the sale of the house. Could be because it was being disputed still. I wasn't involved with any of the paperwork with regards to the mortgage and what was to be paid to who etc. 

I did ask for a copy of the signed agreement, for the loan, lowell said they didn't have it. 

However I do know the ccj was solely in my ex husbands name. 

I also stated that the debt was statued barred and it has been over the six years. At this point I had no idea about this debt. Thats when she stated that my husband had made a payment last month, so I asked if that was the case why are you contacting me over it. She couldn't answer. 

Not once did they state that an agreement had already been made by the ex and that he had been paying it for all these years. Only that one payment was made, so they basically lied. 

I've requested all paperwork with my name on it, they've refused, but said they will investigate and put the case on hold. 

I've put in a formal complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

I also stated that the debt was statued barred and it has been over the six years.

Unfortunately its not as the court claim stopped the limitation period ticking. It is subject to an existing Judgment and therefore a further claim would be impossible but they could try to involve you in further executing methods should your ex fail to complete the payments. But you are not named on the judgment or claim so again ignore.

Its a pity you have requested documents etc and submitting a complaint as you are only feeding them and renewing your connection to the debt.

I did advise ignore.

 

 

.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court claim was in the early 2000s.

I stated to them after they had told me that it was a debt from 1997 that it was statue barred, because at this time of the call, I had no idea that the ex had, 1. Not paid it from the sale of the house, 2. Been to court and 3. Had been paying it all this time. 

To be honest I had no idea what this debt was. I did think that it may have been from the time someone had a phone out in my name back in 2005 but I know I had dealt with that. 

I requested the documents and placed a complaint before I spoke to the ex and before I had posted in here, or I would have ignored

I was just concerned someone had run up a debt in my name again. 

I have a really good credit score and didn't want this to go against me. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I just want to give an update with regards to this debt that Lowell have purchased from Hoist.

I have since found out a lot more information and a few complaints have been made.

The debt accrued in sept 1999, not 97.

The loan was started in January 97. 

After a failed claim with the insurance it went into dispute in the summer of 99. around 26 payments were made on the loan. 

The loan was for 3 years. so around 2 thirds had been paid.

From records that my Ex husband has, it was Robinson Way that first took on the debt in 1999.

Hoist took over Robinson Way and took on the debt in around 2008. There is no CCJ on record. Not that has been found or been shown to have taken place.

Because of so many discrepancies with times and information and not to mention the amount, I placed a SAR with Lowell. 

It took a few weeks, hence why its taken a while for me to update this post. 

I wasn't surprised to see a huge amount of paperwork that landed on my doorstep. It was pretty overwhelming and took some time to get through.

Over half of the paperwork was just their policy with regards to the SAR

0ne page was my details, which was my married name and a an old address that wasnt spelled correctly. No date of birth, nothing else at all, only to state that a complaint had been made and they upheld apart of it and an apology was sufficient. 

There were a couple of redactions that I also expected, because they had stated in their paperwork that some information that belonged to other people would be redacted. 

So after the first few pages that was not their paperwork, I started to try and find the judgement and records of the initial loan and credit agreement. 

There was no record of either. 

The information only went as far back as 2014. 

Also stated was 113 payments had been made, but records of payments only went back as far as 2015. 

Records also showed that hoist where taking payment via a standing order and a direct debit, so two payments for the same account were being paid. This has shown up a few times on the records they sent. 

Hoist had lied when they stated that they had spoken to me in 2000 and 2001, Lowell first told me in was 1999, which would have been impossible. But hoist wasnt involved back at that time. This wasnt in the SAR, so not sure where they got this information. 

What is disturbing and I'm sure breaches data protection is 21 pages of personal and financial information regarding my Ex husband. 

29 times Lowell have mentioned my ex husbands personal details, they even mentioned his sons health and financial details. This is a son from his marriage after we were divorced. Personal family details were also mention, things I cant repeat in here without his permission. 

You could say that they thought that we were still married and that I would know these details, but they had already redacted his name in the first couple of pages, they even redacted the word  "Mr", it was obvious what it was. They had redacted this several times.

Not only that, but I had emailed and had a response 3 weeks before I had even requested the SAR and stated in that email, was the fact, that we had been divorced for over 20 years and that I had very little to do with my ex husband, so they were well aware of our status. 

I have passed on this information to my ex husband and placed a complaint with Lowell and their DPO department. 

My ex husband called them with this information and they clearly denied that they held this information on record.  My Ex stated he was "looking right  at it" so it was obvious they did hold this information. A complaint was lodged. 

My ex husband also told them that my name had been removed from the debt 20 years ago. so why after 20 years were they contacting me. 

Ive requested a CCA and they now have 12 days to respond to that. If Im wrong with that information can anyone enlighten me to what steps I can now take to try and get more information with regards to this debt, as its clearly not correct. The information is, to say the least not correct at all. 

It shows the value of the loan (01/01/1997) and the day the debt accrued (01/09/1999) is the exact same amount. Thats totally not right as over 24 payments had been made on the loan. 

I feel someone had made a huge mistake on the figures at the very beginning or near as,  this would make more sense and roughly in line to what was actually owed at the time, otherwise, fees added would been over £4000. 

Can someone inform me if fees stop once it goes to a debt company. 

Thank you. I will update as and when I get more information. 

The insurance refused to pay out when we made a claim, otherwise the debt would certainly not exist, ive since found out we were miss sold the insurance, but its too late to put in for a PPI.

Another thing, Hoist stated in the records that they have never made any attempt to try and contact me, despite the fact that the account was put on indefinite hold because of my ex husbands personal circumstances. IF that was the case then why didnt they try and contact me so to get some form of payment. 

Wouldnt this prove that my name was in fact taken off of the debt? 

I just wish there was more information. So much is missing. 

 

Edited by seanamarts
Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure why you are bothering, yes it's nice to get to the bottom of the story but the bottom line is is no-one owes lowells anything and they cant prove anything.

its simply as i said earlier one of about 350'000 letters lowells sent out when they attained hoist (robbersway) and their old debt portfolio.

there have been numerous threads here about this with debts going back 30yrs, just to see if they could scam a mug into paying.

i cant see they have 'done anything wrong' with data , at one point you had a joint loan with a bank (not HSBC was it?) with you ex, at one point you were liable for it, you aren't now.

end of story.

dx

 

 

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx.

If it was just myself on the debt, I maybe would  ignore it. However I need to find out if there was a judgement and if so what would the outcome be if I didn't pay it. 

My ex is a little more cautious and worries about this far more than I do. So I really need to get this sorted. He has far more to lose than i do, especially if it goes bottom up. 

However, I am a little concerned that the amount they are after is far more than what it was and because of this amount, could they possibly take it back to court for enforcement. 

And yes you're right, I fully believe neither of us owe them a penny, I'd like to prove this to them. 

It was TSB now Lloyd's 

The data they have given me, I would not have any knowledge of and it has nothing to do with the debt. This is personal information. Also financial information that I would not have privy to. Certainly not after being divorced for 20 years. It's certainly a breach of private data. 

They redacted his name and date of birth on the first page, why redact something I already know? Then not redact his financial details as recent as a few months ago. His sons health and financial details, I'm certainly not privy to these. 

They even state that payments are coming out of our joint bank account. We havnt had a joint account in over 23 years. I've no idea who he now banks with, I'm sure his wife wouldn't want me to know these details either. 

Thank you 😊 

I hope you're well. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell, old TSB/lloyd joint loan with my ex , maiden name too! it's a 25 year debt being chased.!!

you ex has NOTHING to lose...any judgement (if one exists) would now after such a VERY long time be extremely unlikely a judge would allow any enforcement, in fact i dont think we've ever seen it in 16yrs here.

his name, redaction, need to or not-  is irrelevant.  

tell him to stop paying ignore move on.

if i were to be honest , you should not have responded to lowell in the 1st place, simply told him to stop paying and ignore them. so stupid he has been paying this!

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I would just like to give a quick up date on this matter.

 

Lowell admitted their mistake and have closed the account. 

 

They also admit that they dont have enough information to actually proceed with any collection of the debt, and that the account that was held by hoist had a lot of inconsistencies. 

They didnt have any proof of the loan, the amount of the loan or the amount that was outstanding. 

Compensation has been offered to me but I'm not sure if they have offered anything to my ex husband. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...