Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cobbetts sent cheque, but not for interest......


babs2961
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6317 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all - help please!

I had an offer from cobbetts of £1500, which was politley refused. They have now sent a cheque for the charges, but none of the interest...saying that it's due to the limitation act 1980, unable to claim from before 2000?!

The interest amounts to £1500 - is there anything I can do to claim it back?

 

thanks in advance for any help,

 

Babs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Babs

Yes there is stuff you can do to claim it back.

Refuse the cheque as 'full and final settlement' but by all means accept it as an interim, and say that you will pursue the matter for the balance, including interest. use the standard letter to do so.

You can claim for charges more than 6 years before you filed your claim, under S32 of the Limitations Act 1980, which talks of evidence of concealment. I presume you have used standard template letters, which include the sentence "I consider that your repeated representations that your charges are fair and reasonable are deceptive and that they have deceived me into agreeing to pay them." they will have said something about the charges being 'fair and transparent' but not supplied details of the costs they have incurred, a request for which you should also previously asked for - ". If you maintain that your charges are not unlawful, then will you please demonstrate this by letting me have a full breakdown of the costs to which you have been put as a result of any breach of contract by me, in order to reassure me that your penalties really do reflect those costs. These costs will include evidence of, for example, telephone calls (not sales calls), manually (not automatically) produced letters, meetings, scheduled visits either to your branch or to my house, and other activities."

So, if they haven't given you the info, they are concealing and aren't protected by the Limitations Act.

 

Post up a copy of the letter you've received and we'll work out a suitable wording.

Best wishes

 

Westy

Westy

 

 

 

If you like my post, click the scales!!

 

Nov 1 2006 Preliminary letter

21 Feb 2007 - cheque arrived for charges+DEBIT interest +Statutory Interest! Hurray!

Read all about it: natwesttookmymoney - v- NatWest

DONATE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN TO KEEP THE SITE GOING.

 

What can you claim? Vampiress has a good idea:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/69877-what-can-you-claim.html

Anything I say is just a suggestion. I'm a bigmouth, not a lawyer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

great thanks!

 

have had the standard bog off letter, and 'fair and reasonable transparent' letter, along with £1500 offer, politley refused!

 

Here's the one that arrived today:

 

' Although our client maintains its position as stated in our letter of 13 November 2006, and is confident that it will be successful as a final hearing, its legal fees would almost certainly outwiegh the value of the claim, and, as such, the client must take a commercial approach to such claims.

 

Accordingly, without any admission of liability, our client is prepared to settle this matter in full to prevent incurring any further legal fees. By virtue of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980, you are unable to claim for unfair bank charges prior to August 2006 (typo, think they mean 2000). We have therefore deducted the sum of £650 plus interest from your claim and enclose a cheque to the sum of ******. As previously stated, acceptance by you of this goodwill gesture will be in full and final settlement of your claim against or client and strictly on the basis that you write to the Court withdrawing your claim.

 

We would ask that you now write to the court and discontinue proceedings in this matter, We have attached two copies of the Notice of Discontinuance, and we should be grateful if you would complete the copies, forwarding one to the Court and the duplicate to us. If you fail to provide a notice of Discontinuance within 7 days of recepit of this letter, we will make an application to the court to strike out your claim in respect of the charges you claim for pre limitation, which is misguided and irrecoverable. We reserve the right to refer to this letter on the issue of costs.

 

We await receipt of the completed notice of Discontinuance.'

 

 

I've used all the standard template letters...

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, Babs, seen the post. I've got to pop out for a couple of hours, will deal then.

 

Best wishes

 

Westy

Westy

 

 

 

If you like my post, click the scales!!

 

Nov 1 2006 Preliminary letter

21 Feb 2007 - cheque arrived for charges+DEBIT interest +Statutory Interest! Hurray!

Read all about it: natwesttookmymoney - v- NatWest

DONATE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN TO KEEP THE SITE GOING.

 

What can you claim? Vampiress has a good idea:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/69877-what-can-you-claim.html

Anything I say is just a suggestion. I'm a bigmouth, not a lawyer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi babs

just been reading some of your threads, ive recieved a letter from cobbetts requesting more information and a "request pursuant to cpr part 18 alternatively with regard to cpr rule 27.2(3)"

did you recieve a similar sort of letter prior to their offer

im getting really anxious at this stage as really couldnt afford court costs!!!

4/07/06 sent letter re data protection act request NatWest

25/07/06 sent 2nd request to alex lyon

1/08/06 recieved statements (NatWest)

4/08/06 sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) goldfish recorded delivery

4/08/06 sent SAR capital one recorded delivery

14/09/06 sent request for repayment letter and schedule of claim for charges goldfish

14/09/06 as above to capital one

21/09/06 recieved offer from capital one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Babs

Can you post up the letter you've drafted, then we can check to see if you've missed anything.

And by all means have a look at my latest exchange with NatWest on my thread. Dunno if it will be any help but it might be.

Best

Westy

Westy

 

 

 

If you like my post, click the scales!!

 

Nov 1 2006 Preliminary letter

21 Feb 2007 - cheque arrived for charges+DEBIT interest +Statutory Interest! Hurray!

Read all about it: natwesttookmymoney - v- NatWest

DONATE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN TO KEEP THE SITE GOING.

 

What can you claim? Vampiress has a good idea:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/69877-what-can-you-claim.html

Anything I say is just a suggestion. I'm a bigmouth, not a lawyer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

'I have accepted the cheque that you have sent to me for £*************part payment of the full amount of the claim. I do not intend to discontinue the court proceedings at this time as I still intend to pursue the outstanding interest on my claim.'

 

anything else I need to send them? thanks, Babs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...