Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the quick response! the way they’ll have found so far is LinkedIn, I use this for business and work etc. I’ll have to look into the settings and see if I can make this more private I have no other social media.    so to confirm, best step is to directly mail my address to emirates and HSBC directly then ignore idrww and judge and priestly? should I be telling both the uk collection agencies that I’m only going to be dealing with the banks directly and not with them?    would you recommend creating a monthly payment plan to the banks or not?    Thanks, 
    • Hey, I had around 40k credit card and now they say I owe 135. I suggest doing what we’re all doing here. Ignore. My debt was from 2017 and I’ve just had the same rounds of letters every year since x
    • Lords committee thinks the EU should postpone taking back control of its borders because of delays at St Pancras and Dover. Good luck with that one. ‘Tell EU to delay Entry/Exit system’ to avoid serious travel disruption, warns Lords committee | The Independent ARCHIVE.PH archived 21 May 2024 12:17:58 UTC  
    • There are various interesting snippets in this. Minister Johnny Mercer was working on a train recently and another passenger took screenshots of his laptop screen with a memo to No 10 with a few complaints. This one isn't a surprise but seems to show that the Tories are deliberately suppressing the student vote. 'The cabinet minister complained that he had been trying to persuade No 10 to let veterans use their IDs at polling stations “for months without success”. He said he had found out the plans had been blocked by the prime minister’s special advisers because they could “open the floodgates” to allow students to use their cards too. In the event some veterans were turned away from polling stations when they went to vote. No 10, he said, was failing to listen to him and other MPs. “Feels like even I cannot have any impact on the grid/ government comms,” he said.' No 10 neglecting Rishi Sunak’s more popular colleagues, laments minister ARCHIVE.PH archived 21 May 2024 20:20:50 UTC  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Licensed breeder Puppy farm & genetically sick pups.***Settled***


Lesley A

Recommended Posts

FINAL UPDATE. 
I have not posted as the defence were reading the thread. 
An agreement was reached on the day of the hearing.  
I am unable to go into detail but for those in this position the forum has been priceless support and advice so thank you all in the site team.  
for those going through this, follow the process, ignore intimidating tactics and threats and get to the Judge.  They are very supporting of those self representing.  
I note her name has gone from the heading of the thread.  Was this them ? 
Thanks again.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lesley A said:

I have not posted as the defence were reading the thread. 

So what 

 

6 minutes ago, Lesley A said:

I am unable to go into detail

Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.

 

9 minutes ago, Lesley A said:

I note her name has gone from the heading of the thread.  Was this them ?  Them ? 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum

Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.

 

Andy

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Licensed breeder Puppy farm & genetically sick pups.***Settled***

Part of a settlement agreement.  
concerns over her name online we’re raised and I was blamed for bad mouthing.

I explained I put nothing up myself. 
cannot discuss details of the case as per agreement.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so settled by Consent/Tomlin Order.

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement. 

iv long since caused her lots of probs with lots of organisations and sales have been hit hard.  

All done prior to any agreement. 

could have all been avoided but then she would have had zero justice.  

her LA informed her if visit so she cleaned up.  

iv escalated that outcome - prior to agreement.  

this will haunt her for a while yet.  
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had an email re the my breach in agreement by her rep.  

I asked you yesterday if they had asked about her name in the thread being removed.  

The issue they have is the Elizabeth turner and genetic pups entry on google.  

they knew I did not put it up and told them so in court.

 I dont know how to post on google.  

I told them I cannot remove what I did not post. 

when i came back here and saw her name gone from threads title, I presumed her reps sought it.  

now I get an email saying her names still on google your are breaching the agreement as it’s still on google.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

Could you tell us who the email is from please? And when you say 'her name', do you mean the breeder?

Have they told you where on Google the name is visible? It's possible that an older part of your thread is in a Google cache somewhere and I don't think anyone can remove that.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. 
mom not internet savvy but upon opening the thread if you googled her Elizabeth turner breeder (yes breeder sorry),  her name and genetic puppy farming flag up.

 it shows CAG put it up.

Iv told them that.  

iv also told them it’s not slanderous as you have seen the vet reports proving it. 

I really don’t care if it remains. 

I made it clear it was out if my control. 

if it cannot be done, I will copy them into the old cachet message.  
thank you. 

well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.
Thank you.  

The site was priceless.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

If her name appears on Google, she must apply to Google to have it removed. Nobody else can do it, only her.

Known as the right to be forgotten. 

BTW, it's unlikely she'll get them to do it.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace. 
I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.  
It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!! 
plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.  


To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:

 If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ),

does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ?

If generally speaking,

a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing?

Make sense ?  


This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  

Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.  


The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  

Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  

A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Lesley A said:

does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info

deed? :noidea:

you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

YES  new condition is ADDISONS DISEASE 

The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.

 However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.  

This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.  

it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 

..............................

Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      

sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  

Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else exact names of orders in message above.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...