Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • DX: Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Link/Kearns Claimform - old Barclaycard debt - Now N244


Recommended Posts

eh?

how can they have a judgement? theres been no hearing?

unless you didnt file that defence on MCOL by the 18th?

go check claim history.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think kearns have made a mistake if thats the case.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my MCOL history so far:

Recent Transactions for Defendant

 
Claim Status

A claim was issued against you on 18/04/2023

Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 04/05/2023 at 19:38:50

Your acknowledgment of service was received on 05/05/2023 at 08:05:19

Your defence was submitted on 19/05/2023 at 06:35:57

Your defence was received on 19/05/2023 at 08:05:31

 

Could it be down to the fact it wasn't served to Kearns in time? I'm assuming it goes by the above receipts date and time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i doubt it, and them not getting it by the minute is immaterial.. you are a Litigant in person (joe public against the system) a certain leeway is always given,. if there were judgement, it would show.

i think kearns (as they do) are pulling a fast one to scam you. 

they can see mcol too. so..

nothing unusual for link/kearns...worst scammers/ fleecers out there,

if you wish you could ring northants bulk and check.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite clearly states....

Your defence was received on 19/05/2023 at 08:05:31

Impossible for them to have judgment ...ignore or save to attach to your statement and refer to their intimidation and bring it to the courts attention.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll call Northants Bulk to see what they’ve recorded.
 
Then best to add a thread on my MCOL records? 

I know if I did pay it off within a month the CCJ is taken off the record, how do I play it from here? 
Link to post
Share on other sites

see what they say 1st eh?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today, after 4 wasted lunch-hours (Why does HMCTS only open normal office hours when we are all trying to earn money at the same time to pay off the debts?!!!) I finally got through.

They confirmed no such action has been entered against me, no CCJ and all I have done so far is above board and recorded.

Kearns have yet to respond to my defence.

So, scammers/fleecers they seem to be then.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

And to day is the 28th day since you submitted your defence ...the claim is now stayed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

:pound:oh that was so unexpected...

thats Paul and Selina Burdell, for you...

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Open

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All, 

Hope everyone is well. It's been a while, but just had an A4 envelope thud on the doormat today. 

Looks like the game's up and I will have to sort out a repayment of some sort.

Kearns have considered my defence which I 'filled' (and they spelled that wrong twice!) and their client "does sympathise with my situation", but they have kindly "offered me the opportunity to settle the matter without the need for further court action"

In response to me requesting copies of the original documentation, they have also sent those. I don't seem to have the original Notice of Assignment which is unusual as I am careful with filing my documents. 

So, short of paying the full amount owed, plus costs accrued so far, is there any other avenue I can explore?

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you keep thinking your game is up everytime you get a threat-o-gram.:noidea::nono:

have you not been reading up during the quiet periods so you get an overview of how low Link will go to frighten you and their tactics...we are sELF HELP TOO.

 

what you have is a very std letter sent for every claim.

scan up everything to one mass PDF let US decide NOT YOU. 

the claim is stayed  and will cost them upto £275 to lift the stay....

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

they say they enclosed:

a Credit Card Application and Terms and Conditions  - NOPE they have NOT.

all they have done is included 2 sets of Terms and conditions with your name and address (is this the correct address for 18/07/2006?) at the top.

there's no dates on either of them, no signature from you on either and no signature or stamp from BC accepting the agreement on either  even if they were agreements...

they could have come out of Links filing cabinet and they inserted your details themselves . but eitherway neither are an enforceable Consumer Credit Agreement.

from page 12 there are two 2 pages of the well known 6620000000 T&C's which lost Hoist Uk lost SOOO many court claim over, that are well documented here , 30+ pages are missing but that is irrelevant.  type in 66200000 or claimform hoist barclaycard here and you'll see why.

Hoist UK are another DCA that raised so many BC claimforms that failed that their main group owner sold the uk branch off to another DCA as they lost so much money for the group in buying a portfolio of old BC debts they could never win on as NO paperwork ever existed. BC do not keep signed agreements and never have. 

see. PRA Letter of Claim - now Fast Track claimform - old barclaycard debt - now n244 - Page 6 - Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action Group

.....

just like the below stunt.  

On 06/06/2023 at 20:41, Newdogg06 said:

"Dear Mr Newdogg06,

Thank you for taking the time to contact us regarding your previous Section 77/78 request, as part of the Consumer Credit Act (CCA) 1974.

Following a further review of the account in question, I can confirm that a County Court Judgement (CCJ) has been obtained in May 2023 and therefore the account is considered enforceable.
As such we are not required to comply with your more recent request.
If you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Yours Sincerely,
Brinda Mauree Complaint & Dispute Resolution Team"

i see they've included their already filled 'confession letter' to try and convince you even further they are the almighty...sorry Paul Burdell you are NOT. 

.............

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi All,

I've just had the inevitable N24 and other paperwork arrive.

I've read other examples on here and I think I understand the steps to follow.

I have until the 28th May to return the N180 Small Claims Direction Questionnaire, I also have an N244 Application notice copy.

I read an update on a case you kindly put a link in for me to read.

Turns out they lost in court and are now struggling.

I really don't want to get to that stage and am thinking mediation may be the way forward?

Thoughts please?

Pretty sure I've missed the 7 days to have the order set aside

For reference, this is what I received:

Dated 8th May

Before Deputy District Judge Baker sitting at the Civil National Business Centre, 4th Floor St Katharine's House, 21-27 St Katharine's Street, Northampton, NN1 2LH

 
The Court will deal with the application to lift the stay without hearing under CPR 23.8(c)
 
It is ordered that:
 
The Application to lift the stay and for direction questionnaires to be issued is granted.
 
Because this Order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the Order set aside, varied or stayed. A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this Order. If the application is one which requires a hearing, and
 
a) the party making the application is the Defendant; and
b) the Defendant is an individual,
 
then upon the filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the Defendant's home court. In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

we need the full n244, their witness statement and ALL exhibits to one mass PDF please

we do not need statements or blank forms or info leaflets.

that case you refer too was a case of judge lottery. means nothing toward your good chances

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 15/05/2024 at 19:54, Newdogg06 said:

Pretty sure I've missed the 7 days to have the order set aside

You cant really oppose an application to lift the stay only be stayed for 11 months....claim is proceeding.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI I've had a copy from Kearns arrive today of the DQ from the claimant agreeing to referral to the Small Claims Mediation Service and without a hearing.

I am a bit wary of the two replies above from you both.

Which is the most relevant and most urgent to action?

I'm away from Sunday the 19th to Wednesday 22nd working abroad and am conscious there's a bank holiday the day before the deadline so it doesn't give me much time to collate and post relevant paperwork either to you or the parties involved.

Do I just fill in the N180 and post? 

Apologies for my ignorance, It's out of my comfort zone!

Also my case seems to be over the £10k barrier?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need to get your DQ in - it's your opportunity to have a say in what happens next!

It should then transfer to local court, who will look at the DQs and determine next actions.

Fairly self-explanatory and there are guidance notes on the site here.

My Asset/Link/Kearns case was reviewed a couple of weeks ago after transferring to local court and they have been ordered to provide a new CPR-compliant Particulars of Claim, Original Agreement, Deed of Assignment and Notice of Assignment. They have six weeks to comply or it's struck out. As with your case they are relying on a generic print out of an agreement with no personal details or signature.

Don't give the courts a chance to make any decisions without your input and get that N180/N181 in!

Your call as to whether you want mediation - given the lack of evidence from them there is probably no point as you can't mediate an account that appears not to exist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry but we need the full n244, their witness statement and ALL exhibits to one mass PDF please to properly advise.

we do not need statements or blank forms or info leaflets.

if Kearns have sent you their N180 then....


https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5088148


3 copies

yes to mediation (unless you filed our Statute Barred Defence OR this is a claim for a Private Parking Ticket)

1 wit you

Suitability for determination without a hearing? no (that the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally')

the rest is obv

1 to the court

1 to their sols (omit phone/sig/email) if no sols send to claimant

1 for your file

.................

if they've sent an N181 please advise here.

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Newdogg06 said:

Do I just fill in the N180 and post? 

Yes

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. 

I have filled them out, about to post. D1 answered as 'No' as per dx100uk's reply.

Does it make any difference that Kearns haven't filled any of my copy of the N180 out other than the 'CNBC' and the claim reference, out of interest?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...