Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • While I am waiting for the original solicitor to ring back about the will can I ask. After my dad passed they were informed about this an released a copy of the will to me and my brother, should they have set the trust up then as they were informed of his passing?   Thanks again
    • .. A tired little trump simply run out of wind ..  for a little while ...
    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses." The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses   ALSO According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”.   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Issue with pet insurance failing to pay out.

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 358 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Hi all. Seeking some advice for my brother regarding a bill insurance should have paid.

Long story short, my brother is autistic and has long term health conditions. His service dog took ill during the pandemic, and he tried to get an appointment with his vet but he was left to wait a week. Dog started hemorrhaging and the vet refused to see him as they felt there was nothing they could do and the bleeding would stop. It did, but the dog was left severely anemic and had to be rushed to the vets the following day as he was at death's door.

Brother wasn’t allowed to go into the practice with him due to the social distancing rules (which were actually removed on the day this happened) he gets a call 30mins later, saying they’ve found a tumour and it’s in the dog’s best interests to be put to sleep before he comes round from the sedation.

My brother had 10 mins to decide what to do and was denied a chance to say goodbye to his best friend. He begged them to try and do something to save him but they wouldn't hear of it. He was absolutely devastated and as a result of what happened he made a suicide attempt in the weeks following and he’s not really recovered mentally from it. He is still deeply grieving the dog and it’s obviously impacting his health overall. He lost his job and his home as a result of his mental health crisis and is still trying to rebuild.

He had a high cost pet insurance policy with a “lifetime excess” meaning he didn’t need to pay any excess on any conditions he'd already paid an excess on. The bleeding and tumour was tied to an existing condition the dog had, and so he thought the pet insurance would pay out and he’d be done with it.

He has a bad history with this vet, who had previously shown intent to put his dog to sleep and refused to test a lump they removed for cancer as the vet claimed “it’s the least of his problems”.

Anyway, pet insurance changed their terms a few months before this happened and altered their excess policy removing the lifetime excess. No mention of this specifically in any of the documentation, so my brother was none the wiser until they rejected his claim.

Vet sends a bill. Brother raises a complaint with the insurance. They never respond. He’s too upset to deal with the issue himself, so it goes by the wayside until he’s been in therapy for a few months and he’s strong enough to face it.

He raises the issues with the ombudsman. They force him to send a lot of highly sensitive personal/medical information to validate his issues and the state he was in during the 6 month window for raising a complaint. 14 months of back and forth with the ombudsman passes and they refuse to investigate due to time barring, despite having masses of evidence to explain why he was 3 weeks outside of the window to complaint to them.

In the meantime our sister requested the dogs records and xrays from the vet and there is clearly no tumour at all and so we believe the dog may have been put down under false pretenses.

Now the vet is sending him threatening letters saying if he doesn’t pay the outstanding amount, they will send him to a debt collector.

He has no way of paying. Every penny he has is spent on essentials and I’m really concerned that this will kick off his grief again and drive him to do God knows what. He’d paid the insurance in good faith that they’d pay out when needed, and they changed the terms on him without any notification.

The vet, we’ve since discovered, has a number of complaints against them locally for very poor practices and putting dogs down when they didn't need to be. I’m going to raise a complaint with the RCVS in the coming days on my brother's behalf, but I'm not hopeful it will achieve much and in the meantime….

What can I/he do about the outstanding balance being passed to debt collectors?

As I said, he’s autistic/chronically ill, and unable to work now, and is trying to rebuild his credit, so making anything more than a token payment from his benefits is out of the question.  

What can we do when the debt collectors letter comes and/or further action is taken?  

Given my brother's circumstances, are debt collectors likely to pursue him or take court action?

Any insight or advice on this would be a big help. Thanks so much for taking the time to read.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the interesting element here is that he has been paying a regular insurance premium for a no excess policy and that the insurers have now change the terms and conditions and are attempting to withdraw that aspect of the product.

Can you tell us more about this no excess policy. You have described it as "lifetime excess". If it really is lifetime excess then the insurers would not have the right to cancel it as long as the policies properly conducted and properly and regularly renewed every year.

They would be entitled to cancel that for future policies with new customers but not for existing customers.

We need to know more about that element. Please can you put up that particular part of the terms and conditions so that we can have a look. It is on a website then maybe you can link us to that part of the terms and conditions.

I see that you haven't told us the name of the insurance company. Is there a reason for that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As has already been advised, depends on original terms and condition as to whether Insurers had included clause allowing them to remove lifetime excess and If so what the process was to remove it e.g., the Insurers had to provide x number of days notice or they could only take this action in certain circumstances.


Go ahead and make the complaint to RCVS. They should not chase debt whilst complaint is being investigated.



Information on our complaints policy and what to do when you feel that you have not received the standard of service you expect from...


We could do with some help from you.



 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group


If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still waiting for the information I asked for in my earlier post please

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...