Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Centrica Training Bond court claim - help

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 427 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Hey guys

 I left british gas in 2017 and have had this go on since 2019,

I have a court allocated, but not a date yet they never turned up to mediation twice,

essentially they state I owe them 6000 for training fee and 1000 for overpayment of salary,

I have stated I will pay the salary back no problem. But with the training fees I'm not happy with as they claim part of it is for accommodation

which other engineers has a 21 week hotel stay at a holiday in but I never used this I just drove to the training centre 20 minutes from my home.

Bit worries because someone lost their case, has anyone got some advice 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys


 I left british gas in april 2017, I worked for them as a smart meter engineer for 2 years. When I left I was told to pay back a training bond of 6000, retention bonus of 1000 and overpayment of salary of 500


I have massive issues with the training bond as they never gave me an exact break down with figures to what each part of the training bond cost, I have asked them for an itemised receipt but they will not give me one, the have told me it is for training tools, van, hotels stay, this is a generic form for every engineer at the time.


What I am fighting is that other engineers had a 21 week hotel stay at a holiday inn but I never used this I just drove to the training centre 20 minutes from my home. I also gave back all the tool and never kept them so why am I paying for these.


CsT law is a legal company working on their behalf and after they never listened to me i now have a court allocated, but not a date yet they never turned up to mediation twice,


From the beginning I have stated I will pay their overpayment of salary and retention bonus but not the training bond 


Bit worries because someone lost there case, has anyone got some advice 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Centrica Training Bond court claim - help

can you please complete this:


and post up the defence you filled too.


scan up every letter in/out bothsides to one multipage pdf after carefully redacting each jpg scan.


read upload.


and use the listed website to help you.


do NOT use ,doc or .docx files!! one mass pdf only.




please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...