Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • However, if it can be improved - why not? I see you've been looking at other WSs.  You need a little introduction at the start about being a Litigant-in-Person. In Insufficient Signage/Exhibit 1 is it necessary to show the close-up of their signs?  That's almost showing the signage as better than it is.  I would leave out your 2nd, 4th and 5th photos. In Penalty flesh it out a bit.  Add that the Claimant will witter on about the Beavis judgment but that your case is distinguished, Beavis dealt with a car park during opening hours when there was an interest in limiting the time cars could stay. Again in Prohibition flesh it out.  Add some persuasive cases.  There are loads in WSs. In Abuse of Process/Double Recovery para 14 they have inflated their claim from £100 to £170.  The other costs are allowed. The rest is superb - well done.
    • Please can anyone point to some good advice on what to do about the following call centre issue: a) You call X company about a problem b) You can't resolve it with the call agent (due to their fault/limitation/poor communication) c) So you ask to escalate to a manager d) They tell you there are none available right now, but they'll get one to call you back within X time (eg 24/48 hours) e) You wait the full time allotted, but no call comes f) You call again, and start at A, only to repeat the steps with no hope of escalation or resolution. I know that I can write to them, but is there a more immediate way to get the attention of a manager or member of senior staff when trying to resolve a non-straightforward issue, with more immediacy, as well as actually speaking to a genuine manager? I invite advice, links & discussion - I bet many of us have experienced this or similar, so a solution here could be helpful to many I'm sure! Thanks in advance to all who engage with this!
    • Thanks for all the replies - all very helpful. Sorry for the delay in responding - I forgot my password and managed to get myself locked out, which meant I could read but couldn't reply. Dx100uk  Thanks for that very clear (and patient) explanation - I completely get that now. Ok so I'll drop that unless we get to court. Lookinforinfo Good spot on Section 9 [2] [e] (i) - I think you're right they don't actually ask me to pay do they, they only say they have the right to recover the charge from me after 28 days. Your 2nd point might be less convincing, given the length of time the vehicle was there. Sadly I don't know how long parking is permitted for free. Perhaps someone on here can help with that. For context so you have the full picture, the driver entered M1 Tibshelf services not expecting to park at all (and therefore didn't bother to look for parking signs), they were feeling a little funny and thought a coffee might help. They drove into the petrol station area and pulled up in a parking bay at one side of the pumps and went in to get a take out coffee. On returning to the vehicle they were suddenly overcome with a violent attack of dizziness and nausea and couldn't stay upright. After lying flat and unable to move (and feeling extremely cold) for what was apparently some 4 hours they recovered enough to be able to drive on. The coffee was now stone cold of course which was a very annoying waste of 3.50! On recovering, the driver looked round without getting out of the van but couldn't see any signs at all near those few bays so mistakenly assumed the petrol station bays didn't have parking charges. One more question - on other threads people have suggested contacting the land owner to ask them to drop the charge. How would I find out who the landowner is, or perhaps should I write to the manager of the petrol station?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The AA damaged BGPA unit in my car due to non-correct battery replacement procedure

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 391 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

The AA damaged BGPA unit in my car due to non-correct battery replacement procedure

At the end of September last year I got stranded at home because of a dead car battery in my Citroen C4. I phoned the AA, of which I am a member since 2017, and they sent a mechanic to assess the situation. Following his assessment my car battery was replaced by him the same day. Following the battery replacement, I started experiencing problems with my car. The car's dashboard computer screen started - randomly - to display fault messages regarding the electrical circuit and/or the battery. The AA mechanic had suggested this could have happened because the car needed to 'reset' itself, but unfortunately with time the frequency of the messages increased.


I therefore decided to have it checked at an authorised Citroen garage and was given an appointment at the end of January. The diagnostics report, issued by this independent garage, stated that as a result of not following the correct procedures when the car battery was changed, the BPGA Unit had been damaged and needed replacing. The car’s computer fault messages I had been getting were a direct result of the damaged BGPA unit.


The unit has since been replaced at a total cost of £695.


Because the Citroen garage had unequivocally concluded that the BGPA Unit could have not been damaged by anything other than an incorrect battery replacement procedure, I decided to file a claim with the AA for the sustained costs.


After a few weeks of email correspondence, they informed me that they will not refund me as it is their belief that their mechanic has done nothing wrong. During the email correspondence, I had asked them more than once to contact the person at the garage so they could verify my claim (this gentleman at the garage had kindly offered to have his contact details forwarded to the AA for that reason as the garage sees cars being brought in with the same problem on a very regular basis, all due to incorrect battery replacement), but to no avail.


By not contacting the garage and only bringing forward their side of the story, I feel the AA has not conducted a fair nor independent evaluation of the matter. I sought advice with the Financial Ombudsman, but it turns out the AA's Breakdown Service is exempt from authorisation under the Financial Services and Markets Act.

Has anyone else experienced something similar?

According to my garage, they get cases like this in on a weekly basis so there must be others out there.

How have you handled it? Any luck?

Thanks in advance for advice/replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's a BGPA unit?


Who have you been emailing at the AA?


Ideally, you need to put it down in writing to someone senior at the AA and just have one point of contact, unless you have been emailing the CEO?


Then if you wish to proceed with a small claim to recover your costs, there's a set procedure before you issue a claim form.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!



Link to post
Share on other sites

The BGPA Unit is a unit that regulates the electronic circuits in the car.

I have been through the whole claims trajectory with the AA and to no avail.

I've tried the Financial Conduct Authority but they don't fall under that.

That's why I'm seeking advice from people that might have gone through the same issue.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Start off by getting a written statement from the garage which identified the problem and which has offered to provide details to the AA.

Make sure that the identity of the person who made the diagnosis is clear, together with their level of expertise, years of experience et cetera. Also, the steps they took to diagnose the problem and their findings in detail.

If you can get this statement then we can probably help you go forward. If they want to charge a fee then we can probably help you get that back although try to let us know about a possible fee in advance.

Write a letter to the AA:


Dear Sir/Mdm

Reference number XXX – vehicle make/model/registration number

I'm writing in respect of the damage was caused to my vehicle as a result of the incorrect battery replacement carried out by your mechanic on XXX date.

So far you have rejected my position that your mechanic was to blame. I am now proceeding to obtain a formal statement from the garage and the mechanic which diagnosed the problem and corrected it and for which I have paid £XXX.

I am putting you on notice that if the garage requires a fee for this report that I shall be looking to you to reimburse me in addition to the cost of repairing the damage caused by your mechanic.

If you have comments to make then you should probably make them sooner rather than later.

Yours faithfully

I suggest that you sent this letter straightaway. If your garage wants a fee then you should pay it because their statement of evidence will become essential although it is extremely likely that we will help you recover the fee in addition to the cost of repairs.

I suggest that you send the above letter immediately and then telephoned the garage immediately about the report. If they say that they want a fee for it then tell them to wait seven days. That will give the AA more than adequate time to have received your letter and to raise any objections. If you don't hear from them then you proceed to go ahead and get the report and pay the fee.

If you are lucky then you won't be asked a fee at all – but you will need a pretty detailed report.

Then come back here

Incidentally, I can't for the life of me understand what gave you the impression that the Financial Ombudsman Service would have any kind of jurisdiction over this issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For those interested, the BGPA unit is an electronic control unit that forms part of the car's battery charge circuit. It's responsible for monitoring the battery's state of charge, whether to allow charging, the rate of charge and for monitoring battery health with a view to increasing battery life and performance. It also forms part of the car's automatic response to an accident by isolating the battery in response to an impact, with a view to minimising the risk of post-accident fire.


As it's an electronic control unit (ECU) and contains a microcontroller, it can be easily damaged if the battery to which it is connected is not handled correctly, or if the battery is installed in a way other than that outlined by its manufacturer.


BGPA, by the way, is an initialism of its French name; "Boitier de Protection et de Gestion de L'Alimentation".

Edited by theberengersniper
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

initialism = acronym

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or if you prefer, "Boitier de Protection et de Gestion de L'Alimentation" is the acrostic of BGPA


So now you know

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...