Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Work not done properly by Northumbrian water


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 446 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a new connection put in by Northumbrian water.

They dug up the road outside the building to connect the mains to my building.

The issue is that they or their contractors have not laid the road back down properly.

 

Bit of a background

- This is a city centre property so if you can imagine an old listed building with an pedestrian path outside the door and then the main road. Below the path is my basement. 

 

They installed the water meters on the road above where they connected the mains.

The water meters have sunk by around 4"" and all the tarmac around them has cracked leaving holes around the meters.

 

When it rains all the water from the main road is running into the huge cracks in the road and finding its way down to where the pipes enter into my basement.

every time it rains the basement gets quite a bit of water coming into it. 

 

This work was done at the start of January and I have been complaining to them since and they just keep on saying that the contractors will come and fix the road which they haven't done. 

 

The water is now causing major issues not to mention the smell and dampness in the basement which is used as a office by around 3 staff members. 

 

What should I do as they are not doing anything to fix the issue. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you indicating this on a public highway/path?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Its a city centre road in Newcastle. So if you can imagine the main water pipes run in the middle of the road. They dug up the road and connected the pipes to my basement which is below the public footpath on the side of the road. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

go pull the councils chain then!!,

tell them their road is causing a leak and as YOU are responsible for the health and safety of your workforce and this is causing xxxx issues you'll soon be asking them to step in under H&S rules.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where would I even start with the council. It's impossible getting in touch with anyone there.  I paid Northumrian water to do the job. Do I have any legal rights on this matter? Can the water board just do a bad job and walk away? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

19 minutes ago, Maxim2245 said:

Can the water board just do a bad job and walk away? 

yep

 

20 minutes ago, Maxim2245 said:

Do I have any legal rights on this matter?

nope

 

but the council do.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Maxim2245 said:

Just spoke with the council and they have advised that I need to take this up with the water board since they have done the job. 

 

But it's the council who bear the responsibility for the maintenance and upkeep of the road and pavement.

 

I would write to the council's Roads department, telling them what has happened, the location of the issue, the problems it's causing you both in terms of damage to your home and the health implications. Tell them that as they bear responsibility for the condition of the road, footpath and any damage caused through its state of disrepair, that you hold them responsible.

 

If they don't respond favourably to that, I suppose it's time to begin gathering engineer's reports about the cause of the issue, and quotations to remedy it. You can then begin the pre-action protocol and, ultimately, begin an action against them and the water board as joint defendant to have it sorted.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have to agree with the above post

 

You need to make a Formal Complaint to the Councils Roads Department as they are legally responsible for the condition/maintenance of the Public Roads/Pavements and the buck stops with them irrespective it was a water companies private contractor that dug up the road then supposedly fixed it afterwards but done a shoddy job of it causing your property issues of water ingress.

 

Their Roads Department should be coming out to inspect this issue and then send the water company an enforcement notice to repair this road properly.

 

Where I live last November our entire road was dug up for Gas pipe replacement but outside my property when they re laid the road it was bad so complaint to councils roads dept who in turn came out looked and agreed the road needed re laid and gave the Gas Company 2 options, option 1 come out and carry out the work to re lay the road surface and inspection afterwards or option 2 Enforcement Notice issued. Gas Company took option 1 and done the work properly and council inspected work afterwards.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone that digs up a public highway needs the highways authority's written permission to do so and be a registered highways licenced contractor proving  'competency' from said authority that owns said highway before they ever pickup a shovel!!

 

if they don't carry out the works to the required standards, it's THAT authority that can enforce their rules.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Maxim2245 said:

Thanks all. I will speak with the council again and log a compliant. 

 

Do it in writing, don't phone them. If you do end up having to pursue them for the cost of repair, the longer your paper trail is the better. You'll be able to show that you did your best to mitigate the costs for you and for them, but they've refused to engage with you.

 

When you do write to them, it wouldn't hurt to send a copy to the council's legal department too. That might spur them into action. If you do end up having to pursue them legally, it'll be their legal team you'll be dealing with anyway, so no harm in bringing it to their attention immediately.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...