Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • doc legal letter 3.pdfdoc legal letter 3.pdfdoc legal letter 3.pdfHi    I have lost my job in Dubai back in December 2021 and moved to UK. I have personal loan with ADCB bank for £52k and the last payment i made is in Dec 2021 along with my end of service of benefit. I couldn't pay for the last 5 month because i hardly have any saving after each month. I am planning to take out a new loan in UK once i have a good credit score to pay off that UAE loan amount but that will take an another year.   Now i have received an legal notice on 23 May from a lawyer from Dubai ( Legal notice without prejudice) saying if don't payback the full amount with 7 days they will commence legal proceedings for the recovery with Dubai international financial centre court (DIFC ) Small claims tribunal).   Do i need to respond to them?
    • The payment they are talking about is the dd they set up on my account without my knowledge in march 2014 not 2015 !      
    • A new package to help people with rising energy bills will be funded by a windfall tax on energy firms.View the full article
    • So Johnson is moving on from partygate and feels he should deal with issues the country is facing, rather than resign for the culture in No10 or misleading the commons.   The Good Law Project has issued a legal letter threatening court action unless the Met investigates 'The Three Gatherings' or explains why it doesn't think it should investigate the PM's participation in them.   The law must apply fairly to all - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG The Metropolitan Police investigated the various gatherings – we use a neutral expression – around 10 Downing Street during the pandemic...  
    • Having reviewed my previous response, whilst the overall position remains the same, where I referred to a Default, this should have referred to the full amount falling due for payment/the demand for full payment.  I apologise for any confusion that this may have caused and have amended my explanation below to replace any reference to the Default Notice.   Our client’s records show that the last deferment date was the 24 April 2011. Once deferment ends, the agreement takes effect in accordance with the terms thereof – i.e. the monthly payments fall due.   The relevant limitation period in respect of this type of agreement is 6 years, pursuant to section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980 (‘the act’).  In respect of this type of agreement, limitation starts to accrue when the full amount owing falls due for payment, as the creditor does not have a cause of action to bring proceedings for the full amount of the claim until that time.  The full amount owing under the agreement becomes due (and the cause of action accrues) in one of two ways, namely:   1.    If the customer fails to make required payments, the creditor can serve a Default Notice pursuant to section 87 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.  In the event that the customer does not pay the arrears in accordance with the Default Notice, the creditor can terminate the agreement.  Limitation then starts to accrue from that date; or 2.    If the agreement is not terminated due to failure to comply with a Default Notice, the full amount falls due for payment when the full term of the agreement expires.  Limitation then starts to accrue from that date.   In this case, the agreement was not terminated under the terms of a Default Notice.  The cause of action and hence, the limitation period therefore, started to accrue from the date when the term of the agreement expired.  This was a 60 month agreement.  When a student loan account reaches its 60th month and there is still an outstanding balance, the account matures. This means it will exit the Terms and Conditions of the agreement and the balance becomes due in full. The maturity date is moved on by 12 months with each deferment period meaning that this account matured on the 31 March 2016, which is when the relevant limitation period therefore, started to accrue.  Limitation would not therefore, have expired until March 2022.  As you are aware however, proceedings were issued against you in June 2019 – i.e. comfortably within the relevant limitation period.   Further to the above, even if limitation did not start to run from the date specified above (which it did) and actually started to run from the date of last deferment in 2011 as you incorrectly allege, you did make some payments in respect of the debt, the most recent of which was on the 28 March 2015 in the amount of £90.73, which was paid to Capita under a direct debit.  Pursuant to section 29(5) of the act, the relevant limitation period accrues afresh upon each part payment.  In view of that payment, even if your view of when limitation initially started to accrue was correct (which it is not), it would have accrued afresh based upon the payment and would not therefore, have expired until March 2021.  Again, as proceedings were issued in June 2019, this was comfortably within limitation.   The Subject Access Request supplied to you by Erudio enclosed a number of letters that were issued to you throughout 2016, in which they clearly informed you that your account was in arrears. These letters made it clear that the client wished to work with you to agree an affordable repayment arrangement and that failure to do so may result in a Default being registered against you. Unfortunately, they were unable to reach an amicable resolution resulting in a Final Demand being produced on the 12 January 2017 and issued to you on the 14 January 2017 and it ultimately, becoming necessary for our client to then issue proceedings against you due to non-payment.   As such, whilst I apologise if you feel that our client deliberately delayed the cause of action in order to prolong the limitation period, I assure you that is not the case. As set out above, as the agreement was not terminated under the terms of a Default Notice, Erudio were contractually obligated to allow a 60 month period between the last deferment date and the account maturity date.  They then acted in a fair and reasonable manner by allowing an additional 10 months after the account maturity date to give you the opportunity to resolve the matter before the Demand in Full was issued.    I have also had sight of an email that you sent to my colleague, Richard Senior in which you requested us to confirm that we have complied with FCA regulation. Having reviewed the matter, I am satisfied that throughout our instruction we have acted in accordance with the relevant FCA regulation.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

clydesdale financial services charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5529 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Hi all, I have just started reading up about the possibility getting my charges refunded by CFS, and I was wondering if anybody can give me some quick starting points / and if I should go ahead or not etc


Brief history



I purchased a oven from a company called northern Electric some years ago now, they went bust and as I hadn't paid off my bill to them for the oven (by now pay later) the administrators passed on my account onto CFS. I heard nothing for 1/2 year after hearing that they had gone down the pan, then I recieved a call from CFS saying that I needed to pay £22 a month to clear the account.


Having a couple of dodgy financal years I have missed around 20 payment dates and have now a 800 settlement figure from them / a large amount of it being made up from these late payment charges and 'default letter charges'.


My question is this > can I reclaim these charges ? Are they unlawful?





Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...



I too am putting in a claim to Clydesdale Financial Services - got my statements and found that they have charged me £22.50 arerars letter charge - total of £280.14 - rang them and asked what interest I was charged on the account - it was 29.9% - so I am claiming contractual interest on the sum of £196.07 making a total of £476.21.


Letter going off today. Will keep you informed of my progress.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...